The structure of the MHC-SF in a large American sample: contributions of multidimensional scaling

References

• Asparouhov T, Muthen B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Modeling, 16, 397–438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov T, Muthén B, Morin AJS. (2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances. J Manag, 41, 1561–77
   Google Scholar
• Borg I, Groenen PJF, Mair P. (2013). Applied multidimensional scaling. New York, NY: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Brown TA. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press
   Google Scholar
• Commandeur JJF, Heiser WJ. (1993). Mathematical derivations in the proximity scaling (PROXSCAL) of symmetric data matrices (Tech. Rep. No. RR-93-03). Leiden, The Netherlands: Department of Data Theory, Leiden University
   Google Scholar
• Davison ML, Sireci SG. (2000). Multidimensional scaling. In: Tinsley HEA, Brown S, eds. Handbook of multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 325–49
   Google Scholar
• Helson R, Srivastava S. (2001). Three paths of adult development: Conservers, seekers, and achievers. J Pers Soc Psychol, 80, 995–1010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout MC, Papesh MH, Goldinger SD. (2013). Multidimensional scaling. Wires Cogn Sci, 4, 93–103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M. (2016). A new look at the factor structure of the MHC‐SF in Iran and the United States using exploratory structural equation modeling. J Clin Psychol, 72, 701–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M. (in press). Factor structure and measurement invariance of the MHC-SF in United States. Eur J Psychol Assess
   Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M, Capone V, Petrillo G, Caso D. (2017). Discriminant validity of hedonic, social, and psychological well-being in two Italian samples. Personal Individ Differ, 109, 23–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M, Jovanović V. (2017). The factor structure of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Serbia: An evaluation using exploratory structural equation modeling. J Ment Health, 26, 510–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M, Lamers SMA. (2016). Reinvestigation of the factor structure of the MHC-SF in the Netherlands: Contributions of exploratory structural equation modeling. Personal Individ Differ, 97, 8–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M, Wissing MP, Khumalo IP, Lamers SM. (2013). Measurement invariance of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) across three cultural groups. Personal Individ Differ, 55, 755–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaś D, Cieciuch J, Keyes CLM. (2014). The Polish adaptation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Personal Individ Differ, 69, 104–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes CLM. (2006). The subjective well-being of America’s youth: Toward a comprehensive assessment. Adolesc Fam Health, 4, 3–11
   Google Scholar
• Keyes CLM, Wissing M, Potgieter JP, et al. (2008). Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clin Psychol Psychother, 15, 181–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal JB, Wish M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Lamers S, Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer ET, et al. (2011). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the mental health continuum‐short form (MHC‐SF). J Clin Psychol, 67, 99–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Morin AJS, Parker PD, Kaur G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 10, 85–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrillo G, Capone V, Caso D, Keyes CL. (2015). The Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF) as a measure of well-being in the Italian context. Soc Indic Res, 121, 291–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkley RL, Gelfand MJ, Duan L. (2005). When, where and how: The use of multidimensional scaling methods in the study of negotiation and social conflict. Int Negotiat, 10, 79–96
   Google Scholar
• Vittersø J. (2016). The most important idea in the world: An introduction. In: Vittersø J, ed. Handbook of eudaimonic well-being. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 1–24
   Google Scholar