“Chipping away”: non-consumer researcher perspectives on barriers to collaborating with consumers in mental health research

References

• Belone L, Lucero JE, Duran B, et al. (2016). Community-based participatory research conceptual model: Community partner consultation and face validity. Qual Health Res, 26, 117–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaz A, Biri D, McKevitt C. (2016). Rethinking the relationship between science and society: Has there been a shift in attitudes to Patient and Public Involvement and Public Engagement in Science in the United Kingdom? Health Expect, 19, 592–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. (2002). Consumer involvement in health research: A review and research agenda. Health Policy, 61, 213–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 3, 77–101
   Google Scholar
• Bromley E, Mikesell L, Jones F, Khodyakov D. (2015). From subject to participant: Ethics and the evolving role of community in health research. Am J Public Health, 105, 900–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne L, Happell B, Welch A, Moxham L. (2013). Reflecting on holistic nursing: The contribution of an academic with lived experience of mental health service use. Issues Mental Health Nurs, 34, 265–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell P, Rose D. (2010). Action for change in the UK: Thirty years of the user/survivor movement. In: Pilgrim D, Rogers A, Pescosolido B, eds. The SAGE handbook of mental health and illness. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 452–71
   Google Scholar
• Case AD, Byrd R, Claggett E, et al. (2014). Stakeholders' perspectives on community-based participatory research to enhance mental health services. Am J Commun Psychol, 54, 397–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan P, Pickett S, Kraus D, et al. (2015). Community-based participatory research examining the health care needs of African Americans who are homeless with mental illness. J Health Care Poor Underserved, 26, 119–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabby L, Tranulis C, Kirmayer LJ. (2015). Explicit and implicit attitudes of Canadian psychiatrists toward people with mental Illness. Can J Psychiatry, 60, 451–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas C. (2017). Public and patient participation in health policy, care and research. Porto Biomed J, 2, 31–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. (2014). Patient engagement in research: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res, 14, 89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis P. (2016). The language of research (part 11) – Research methodologies: Interview types. Wounds UK, 12, 104–6
   Google Scholar
• Ennis L, Wykes T. (2013). Impact of patient involvement in mental health research: Longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry, 203, 381–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner A. (2017). Survivor research and Mad Studies: The role and value of experiential knowledge in mental health research. Disabil Soc, 32, 500–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fothergill A, Mitchell B, Lipp A, Nortway R. (2012). Setting up a mental health user research group: A process paper. J Res Nurs, 18, 746–59
   Google Scholar
• Gee A, McGarty C, Banfield M. (2016). Barriers to genuine consumer and carer participation from the perspectives of Australian systemic mental health advocates. J Mental Health, 25, 231–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillard S, Simons L, Turner K, et al. (2012). Patient and public involvement in the coproduction of knowledge: Reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study. Qual Health Res, 22, 1126–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happell B, Scholz B. (2018). Doing what we can, but knowing our place: Being an ally to promote consumer leadership in mental health. Int J Mental Health Nurs, 27, 440–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland K. (2007). The epistemological bias of ethics review: Constraining mental health research. Qual Inquiry, 13, 895–913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INVOLVE. (2012). Briefing notes for researchers: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: Involve
   Google Scholar
• Kalathil J, Jones N. (2016). Unsettling disciplines: Madness, identity, research, knowledge. Philos Psychiat Psychol, 23, 183–8
   Google Scholar
• Landry D. (2017). Survivor research in Canada: ‘Talking' recovery, resisting psychiatry, and reclaiming madness. Disabil Soc, 32, 1437–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Las Vergnas O, French HDR. (2017). Patients' participation in health research: A classification of cooperation schemes. J Participat Med, 9, e16
   Google Scholar
• Lawn S. (2016). What researchers think about involving consumers in health research. Aust J Prim Health, 22, 483–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locock L, Boylan AM, Snow R, Staniszewska S. (2017). The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research. Health Expect, 20, 836–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister M, Munday J, Taikato M, et al. (2012). Determining mental health research priorities in a Queensland region: An inclusive and iterative approach with mental health service clinicians, consumers and carers. Adv Mental Health, 10, 268–76
   Google Scholar
• McDermid F, Peters K, Jackson D, Daly J. (2014). Conducting qualitative research in the context of pre-existing peer and collegial relationships. Nurse Res (2014+), 21, 28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michalak EE, Jones S, Lobban F, et al. (2016). Harnessing the potential of community-based participatory research approaches in bipolar disorder. Int J Bipolar Disord, 4, 4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjosund NH, Eriksson M, Espnes GA, et al. (2017). Service user involvement enhanced the research quality in a study using interpretative phenomenological analysis – The power of multiple perspectives. J Adv Nurs, 73, 265–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson S, Trite J, Weaver T. (2014). Activity and views of service users involved in mental health research: UK survey. Br J Psychiatry, 205, 68–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper C, Gray F, Cadogan E. (2018). Co-production: Putting principles into practice in mental health contexts. Melbourne
   Google Scholar
• Rose D. (2017). Service user/survivor-led research in mental health: Epistemological possibilities. Disabil Soc, 32, 773–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo J, Sweeney A. (2016). Searching for a rose garden: Challenging psychiatry, fostering Mad Studies. PCCS Books
   Google Scholar
• Scholz B, Bocking J, Happell B. (2017). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Consumers in mental health organisations' hierarchies. Issues Mental Health Nurs, 38, 374–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz B, Bocking J, Happell B. (2018). Improving exchange with consumers within mental health organizations: Recognizing mental ill health experience as a ‘sneaky, special degree’. Int J Mental Health Nurs, 27, 227–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slay J, Stephens L. (2013). Co-production in mental health: A literature review. London: New Economics Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Staley K, Kabir T, Szmukler G. (2013). Service users as collaborators in mental health research: Less stick, more carrot. Psychol Med, 43, 1121–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins R. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences: Qualitative research methods. Vol. 48. London, England: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Thompson J, Barber R, Ward PR, et al. (2009). Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expect, 12, 209–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veseth M, Binder PE, Borg M, Davidson L. (2017). Collaborating to stay open and aware: Service user involvement in mental health research as an aid in reflexivity. Nordic Psychol, 69, 256–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollm B, Foster S, Bates P, Huband N. (2017). How best to engage users of forensic services in research: Literature review and recommendations. Int J Forensic Mental Health, 16, 183–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallcraft J, Schrank B, Amering M. (2009). Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research. Chichester: Wiley
   Google Scholar