21,001
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Models of mental health problems: a quasi-systematic review of theoretical approaches

&
Pages 396-406 | Received 07 Jul 2021, Accepted 21 Dec 2021, Published online: 11 Jan 2022

References

  • Aftab, A., & Rashed, M. A. (2021). Mental disorder and social deviance. International Review of Psychiatry, 33(5), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2020.1815666
  • Aftab, A., & Waterman, G. S. (2020). Conceptual competence in psychiatry: Recommendations for education and training. Academic Psychiatry, 45(2), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-020-01183-3
  • Andresen, R., Oades, L. G., & Caputi, P. (2011). Psychological recovery: Beyond mental illness. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • APA (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association.
  • Avasthi, A., Kate, N., & Grover, S. (2013). Indianization of psychiatry utilizing Indian mental concepts. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(Suppl 2), S136–S144. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.105508
  • Balbo Ambrosolio, E., & Pis-Diez Pretti, G. (2007). The concept of mental illness in Morocco migrants. Archivos Psiquiatria, 70(3), 175–190.
  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2017). Editorial perspective: Neurodiversity – A revolutionary concept for autism and psychiatry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 58(6), 744–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12703
  • Bell, D. (2010). Psychiatry and psychoanalysis: A conceptual mapping. In A. Lemma & M. Patrick (Eds.), Off the couch: Contemporary psychoanalytic applications (pp. 176–193). Routledge. https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=psyc7&AN=2010-08315-011
  • Bentall, R. (2006). Madness explained: why we must reject the Kraepelinian paradigm and replace it with a ‘complaint-orientated’ approach to understanding mental illness. Medical Hypotheses, 66(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2005.09.026
  • Bohmer, M. (2016). Does psychiatry need religion and spirituality in its treatment approach? Narcissism as an example. South African Journal of Psychiatry, 22(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v22i1.563
  • Bolton, D. (2008). What is mental disorder? An essay in philosophy, science, and values. Oxford UP.
  • Booth, A., & Carroll, C. (2015). Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: Is it feasible? Is it desirable? Health Information and Libraries Journal, 32(3), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12108
  • Borsboom, D., Cramer, A., Kalis, A. (2018). Brain disorders? Not really… Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 42, e2. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x17002266
  • Bracken, P., & Thomas, P. (2005). Postpsychiatry: Mental health in a postmodern world. Oxford University Press.
  • Bracken, P., & Thomas, P. (2013). Challenges to the modernist identity of psychiatry: User empowerment and recovery. In K. W. M. Fulford, M. Davies, R. G. T. Gipps, G. Graham, J. Z. Sadler, G. Stanghellini, & T. Thornton (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry (pp. 123–138). Oxford University Press.
  • Brune, M. (2002). Toward an integration of interpersonal and biological processes: Evolutionary psychiatry as an empirically testable framework for psychiatric research. Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 65(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.65.1.48.19759
  • Burstow, B. (2014). An attrition model for anti-psychiatry. In B. Burstow, B. A. LeFrancois, & S. Diamond (Eds.), Psychiatry disrupted (pp. 34–51). McGill-Queen's University Press.
  • Campbell, M., Egan, M., Lorenc, T., Bond, L., Popham, F., Fenton, C., & Benzeval, M. (2014). Considering methodological options for reviews of theory: Illustrated by a review of theories linking income and health. Systematic Reviews, 3, 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-114
  • Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2018). All for one and one for all: Mental disorders in one dimension. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(9), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17121383
  • Chapman, R. (2019). Neurodiversity theory and its discontents: Autism, schizophrenia, and the social model (R. B. Serife Tekin, Ed. 1st ed.). Bloomsbury.
  • Clark, L. A., Cuthbert, B., Lewis-Fernandez, R., Narrow, W. E., & Reed, G. M. (2017). Three approaches to understanding and classifying mental disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 18(2), 72–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100617727266
  • Crichton, P., Carel, H., & Kidd, I. J. (2017). Epistemic injustice in psychiatry. BJPsych Bulletin, 41(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.050682
  • Cromby, J., Diamond, B., Kelly, P., Moloney, P., Priest, P., Smail, D., & Soffe-Caswell, J. (2012). Draft manifesto for a social materialist psychology of distress. Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, 12(2), 93–107.
  • Cromby, J., & Harper, D. (2013). Paranoia: Contested and contextualised. In S. Coles, & S. Keenan (Eds.), Madness contested: Power and practice (pp. 23–41). PCCS Books.
  • de Gonzalez, E. N. C. (2001). From psychopathology to subjective well-being: Changing the model. Acta Psiquiátrica y Psicológica de América Latina, 47(4), 306–315.
  • de Haan, S. (2020). Enactive psychiatry. Cambridge University Press.
  • Deegan, P. (2001). Recovery as a self-directed process of healing and transformation. In C. Brown (Ed.), Recovery and wellness. Models of hope and empowerment for people with mental illness (pp. 5–22). The Haworth Press.
  • Dixon, J., & Richter, D. (2018). Contemporary public perceptions of psychiatry: Some problems for mental health professions. Social Theory & Health, 16(4), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-017-0059-9
  • Finkel, E. J. (2014). The I3 model: Metatheory, theory, and evidence. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1–104.
  • Foucault, M. (1961). Folie et Déraison: Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique. Librairie Plon.
  • Freeman, W. J. (2003). Neurodynamic models of brain in psychiatry. Neuropsychopharmacology, 28(Suppl 1), S54–S63. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300147
  • Fulford, K. W., Davies, M., Gipps, R. T., Graham, G., Sadler, J. Z., Stanghellini, G., & Thornton, T. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry. Oxford UP.
  • Ghaemi, S. N. (2010). The rise and fall of the biopsychosocial model: Reconciling art and science. John Hopkins University Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor Books.
  • Gomory, T., Cohen, D., & Kirk, S. A. (2013). Madness or mental illness? Revisiting historians of psychiatry. Current Psychology, 32(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9168-3
  • Gosney, P., & Bartlett, P. (2020). The UK Government should withdraw from the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 216(6), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.182
  • Graham, G. (2013). The disordered mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and mental illness. (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Greenspan, S. I. (2008). A dynamic developmental model of mental health and mental illness. In A. Fogel, B. J. King, & S. G. Shanker (Eds.), Human development in the twenty-first century: Visionary ideas from systems scientists (pp. 157–175). Cambridge UP.
  • Haldipur, C. V., Knoll, J. L., & van der Luft, E. (Eds.). (2019). Thomas Szasz: An appraisal of his legacy. Oxford UP.
  • Johnstone, L., Boyle, M., Cromby, J., Dillon, J., Harper, D., Kinderman, P., Longden, E., Pilgrim, E., & Read, J. (2018). The power threat meaning framework: Towards the identification of patterns in emotional distress, unusual experiences and troubling behaviours, as an alternative to functional diagnosis. B. P. Society. https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/www.bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20-%20Files/PTM%20Framework%20%28January%202018%29_0.pdf
  • Kendell, R. E. (1975). The concept of disease and its implications for psychiatry. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 127, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.127.4.305
  • Kendler, K. S. (2005). Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(3), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.433
  • Kendler, K. S., & Campbell, J. (2014). Expanding the domain of the understandable in psychiatric illness: an updating of the Jasperian framework of explanation and understanding. Psychological Medicine, 44(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712003030
  • Kendler, K. S., Zachar, P., & Craver, C. (2011). What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders? Psychological Medicine, 41(6), 1143–1150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710001844
  • Knudsen, M., & Vogd, W. (2014). Systems theory and the sociology of health and illness: Observing healthcare. Routledge.
  • Kobak, R., & Bosmans, G. (2019). Attachment and psychopathology: A dynamic model of the insecure cycle. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 76–80.
  • Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., Brown, T. A., Carpenter, W. T., Caspi, A., Clark, L. A., Eaton, N. R., Forbes, M. K., Forbush, K. T., Goldberg, D., Hasin, D., Hyman, S. E., Ivanova, M. Y., Lynam, D. R., Markon, K., … Zimmerman, M. (2017). The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258
  • Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Cicero, D. C., Conway, C. C., DeYoung, C. G., Eaton, N. R., Forbes, M. K., Hallquist, M. N., Latzman, R. D., Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Ruggero, C. J., Simms, L. J., Waldman, I. D., Waszczuk, M. A., & Wright, A. G. C. (2021). The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): A quantitative nosology based on consensus of evidence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 17, 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-093304
  • Kozak, M. J., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2016). The NIMH research domain criteria initiative: Background, issues, and pragmatics. Psychophysiology, 53(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12518
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago University Press.
  • Kusch, M. (2017). Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism. Synthese, 194(12), 4687–4703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1041-0
  • Lewis, B. (2008). Democracy in psychiatry: Or why psychiatry needs a new constitution. In C. I. Cohen & S. Timimi (Eds.), Liberatory psychiatry: Philosophy, politics, and mental health (pp. 73–88). Cambridge University Press.
  • Lydon-Staley, D. M., & Bassett, D. S. (2018). Network neuroscience: A framework for developing biomarkers in psychiatry. Current Topics in Behavioural Neuroscience, 40, 79–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2018_41
  • Magdaleno, A. M., Werner, C. M. L., & De Araujo, R. M. (2012). Reconciling software development models: A quasi-systematic review. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(2), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.08.028
  • McCauley, C., McKenna, H., Keeney, S., & McLaughlin, D. (2015). Concept analysis of recovery in mental illness in young adulthood. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(8), 579–589.
  • Menon, V. (2011). Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: A unifying triple network model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339, b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
  • Murphy, D. (2020). Philosophy of Psychiatry. Retrieved November 26, 2021, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/psychiatry/
  • Nature (1992). The decade of the brain. Nature, 357(6377), 348. https://doi.org/10.1038/357348a0
  • Nielsen, K., & Ward, T. (2020). Mental disorder as both natural and normative: Developing the normative dimension of the 3e conceptual framework for psychopathology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 40(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000118
  • Nolan, K. A., Shope, C. B., Citrome, L., & Volavka, J. (2009). Staff and patient views of the reasons for aggressive incidents: A prospective, incident-based study. Psychiatric Quarterly, 80(3), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-009-9104-8
  • Osborne, R. (2016). Persecutory delusions: A false, meaningless pathology? A critique of the use of psychopathological conceptualisations of paranoia in counselling psychology practice. Existential Analysis, 27(2), 357–368.
  • Pilgrim, D. (2009). Recovery from mental health problems: Scratching the surface without ethnography. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(4), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650530903375033
  • Protopopescu, X., & Gerber, A. J. (2013). Bridging the gap between neuroscientific and psychodynamic models in child and adolescent psychiatry. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 22(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2012.08.008
  • Radden, J. (2019a). Mental disorder (Illness). Retrieved June 22, 2020, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-disorder/
  • Radden, J. (2019b). Mental disorder (Illness). Retrieved April 21, 2020 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/mental-disorder/
  • Read, J. (2005). The bio-bio-bio model of madness. The Psychologist, 18(10), 596–597.
  • Redish, A. D., & Gordon, J. A. (2016). Breakdowns and failure modes. In A. D. Redish & J. A. Gordon (Eds.), Computational psychiatry: New perspectives on mental illness (pp. 15–29). MIT Press.
  • Roy, B. (2007). Radical psychiatry: An approach to personal and political change. In E. Aldarondo (Ed.), Advancing social justice through clinical practice (pp. 65–90). Erlbaum. https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=psyc5&AN=2007-06573-004
  • Science (1990). Brain decade. Science, 247(4939), 157. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.247.4939.157-a
  • Stephan, K. E., Bach, D. R., Fletcher, P. C., Flint, J., Frank, M. J., Friston, K. J., Heinz, A., Huys, Q. J. M., Owen, M. J., Binder, E. B., Dayan, P., Johnstone, E. C., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Montague, P. R., Schnyder, U., Wang, X. J., & Breakspear, M. (2016). Charting the landscape of priority problems in psychiatry, part 1: Classification and diagnosis. The Lancet. Psychiatry, 3(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00361-2
  • Tew, J. (2015). Towards a socially situated model of mental distress. In H. Spandler, J. Anderson, & B. Sapey (Eds.), Madness, distress and the politics of disablement (pp. 69–82). Policy Press.
  • Travassos, G. H., dos Santos, P. S. M., Mian, P. G., Neto, P. G. M., & Biolchini, J. (2008). An environment to support large scale experimentation in software engineering. In 13th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS 2008).
  • Uher, R. (2009). The role of genetic variation in the causation of mental illness: An evolution-informed framework. Molecular Psychiatry, 14(12), 1072–1082. https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=psyc6&AN=2011-06505-004 https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2009.85
  • United Nations (2019). Right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health – Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.
  • van Os, J., Guloksuz, S., Vijn, T. W., Hafkenscheid, A., & Delespaul, P. (2019). The evidence-based group-level symptom-reduction model as the organizing principle for mental health care: Time for change? World Psychiatry, 18(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20609
  • Wallcraft, J., & Hopper, K. (2015). The capabilities approach and the social model of mental health. In H. Spandler, J. Anderson, & B. Sapey (Eds.), Madness, distress and the politics of disablement (pp. 83–88). Policy Press.
  • Walvisch, J. (2017). Defining “mental disorder” in legal contexts. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 52, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.04.003
  • Weiss, M. G., & Somma, D. (2007). Explanatory models in psychiatry. In D. Bughra & D. Bhui (Eds.), Textbook of cultural psychiatry (pp. 127–140). Cambridge UP.
  • Williams, L. M. (2016). Precision psychiatry: a neural circuit taxonomy for depression and anxiety. The Lancet. Psychiatry, 3(5), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00579-9
  • Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2007). Psychiatric disorders: A conceptual taxonomy. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(4), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2007.164.4.557
  • Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2017). The philosophy of nosology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045020