48
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Clinical significance: An overview of methods

&
Pages 17-24 | Published online: 06 Jul 2009

References

  • Ankuta, G. Y. & Abeles, N. (1993). Client satisfaction, clinical significance, and meaningful change in psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 70–74.
  • Christensen, L. & Mendoza, J. L. (1986). A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index. Behavior Therapy, 17, 305–308.
  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statsitical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). New York, Aca-demic Press.
  • Goldfried, M. R., Greenberg, L. S. & Marmar, C. (1990). Individual psychotherapy: Process and outcome. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 659–688.
  • Grundy, E. M. (1994). Assessing clinical significance: Application to the Child Behavior Checklist. Un-published doctoral dissertation. Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Utah.
  • Hollon, S. D. & Flick, S. N. (1988). On the meaning and methods of clinical significance. Behavior Assessment, 10, 197–206
  • Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C. & Revenstorf, D. (1984a). Psychotherapy outcome research: Meth-ods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336–452.
  • Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., Revenstorf, D., Baucom, D. H., Hahlweg, K. & Margolin, G. (1984b). Vari-ability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioral marital therapy: A reanalysis of out-come data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 497–504.
  • Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C. & Revenstorf, D. (1986). Toward a standard definition of clinically significant change. Behavior Therapy, 17, 308–311.
  • Jacobson, N. S., & Revenstorf, D. (1988). Statistics for assessing the clinical significance ofpsychotherapy techniques: Issues, problems, and new develop-ments. Behavior Assessment, 10, 133–145.
  • Jacobson, N. S. & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical signifi-cance: A statistical approach to defining meaning-ful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.
  • Kadera, S. W., Lambert, M. J. & Andrews, A. A. (in press). How much therapy is nearly enough: A session by session analysis of the psychotherapy dose-effect relationship. Psychotherapy.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social vali-dation. Behavior Modification, 1,427–451.
  • Lambert, M. J. & Hill, C. E. (1994) Assessing psycho-therapy outcomes and processes. In: A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of Psycho-therapy and Behavior Change (4th Ed.). New York,Wiley.
  • Lambert, M. J., Lunnen, K. M., Unnpress, V., Hansen, N. B. & Burlingame, G. M. (1994). Administration and Scoring Manual for the Outcome Question-naire. Salt lake City, The Centre for Behavioral Healthcare Efficiency.
  • Lambert, M. J., Shapiro, D. A. & Bergin, A. E. (1986) The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In: S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of Psy-chotherapy and Behavior Change. (3rd Ed.). New York, Wiley.
  • Risley, T. R. (1970) Behavior modification: An experimental-therapeutic endeavor. In: L. A. Hamerlynck, P.O. Davidson, & L. E. Acker (Eds.), Behavior Modification and Ideal Mental Health Services. Calgary, Alberta, Canada, University of Calgary Press.
  • Robinson, L. A., Berman, J. S. & Neimeyer, R. A. (1990) Psychotherapy for the treatment of depres-sion: a comprehensive review of controlled out-come research. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 30–49.
  • Shadish, W. R., M ontgomery, L. M., Wilson, P., Wilson, MR., Bright, I. & Okwumabua, T. (1993) Effects of family and marital psychotherapies: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psy-chology, 61, 992–1002.
  • Tingey, R., Lambert, M. J., Burlinghame, G. M. & Hansen, N. B. (in press). Assessing clinical signifi-cance: Proposed extensions to method. Psycho-therapy Research.
  • Wampold, B. E. & Jenson, W. R. (1986). Clinical significance revisited. Behavior Therapy, 17, 302–305.
  • Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.