Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation Volume 24, 2002 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
189
Views
62
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Dutch adaptation and content validity of the 'Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)'

J.W.H. Custers Department of Pediatric Physiotherapy, University Medical Centre/Children's Hospital Utrecht, the Netherlands
,
J.E. Wassenberg-Severijnen Institute for the Study of Education and Human Development, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
,
J. Van Der Net Department of Pediatric Physiotherapy, University Medical Centre/Children's Hospital Utrecht, the Netherlands
,
A. Vermeer Institute for the Study of Education and Human Development, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
,
H. 'T Hart Institute for the Study of Education and Human Development, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
&
P.J.M. Helders Department of Pediatric Physiotherapy, University Medical Centre/Children's Hospital Utrecht, the Netherlands
Pages 250-258 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

  • Relman AS. Assessment and accountability: the third revolution in medical care. The New England Journal of Medicine 1988; 319: 1220-1222.
  • Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Medical Care 1989; 27: S217-S232.
  • Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson N. Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Quality of Life Research 1993; 2: 451 -459.
  • Guillemin P, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1993; 46: 1417-1432.
  • Hunt SM, Cross-cultural comparability of quality of life measures. Drug Information Journal 1993; 27: 395-400.
  • Touw-Otten F, Meadows K. Cross-cultural issues in outcome measurement. In: A Hutchinson, E McCoIl, M Christie, C Riccalton (eds). Health Outcome Measures in Primary and Outpatient Care. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1996; 199-208.
  • Herdman M, Pox Rushby J, Badia X. 'Equivalence' and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. Quality of Life Research 1997; 6: 237-247.
  • Chwalow AJ. Cross-cultural validation of existing quality of life scales. Patient Education and Counselling 1995; 26: 313-318.
  • Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81: S15-S20.
  • Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, Haltiwanger JT, Andrellos PJ. Pediatrie Evaluation of Disability Inventory: Development, Standardization, and Administration Manual. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center Inc. and PEDI Research Group, 1992.
  • Berry JW, Poortinga YH, Segall MH, Dasen PR. Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1992.
  • Feldman AB, Haley SM, Coryell J. Concurrent and construct validity of the Pediatrie Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Physical Therapy 1990; 70: 602-610.
  • Nichols DS, Case-Smith J. Reliability and validity of the Pediatrie Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Pediatrie Physical Therapy 19%; 8: 15-24.
  • Wright FV, Boschen KA. The Pediatrie Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI): validation of a new functional assessment outcome instrument. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1993; 7: 41 -42.
  • Reid DT, Boschen KA, Wright FV. Critique of the Pediatrie Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 1993; 13: 57-87.
  • Ketelaar M. Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Functional Approach to Physical Therapy, dissertation. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University, 1999.
  • Haley SM, Coster WJ, Faas RM. A content validity study of the Pediatrie Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Pediatrie Physical Therapy 1991; 3: 177-184.
  • Custers JWH, Hoijtink H, Net Jvd, Helders PJM. Cultural differences in functional status measurement-Analyses of person fit according to the Rasch model. Quality of Life Research 2000; 9: 571-578.
  • Klauwer KC. The assessment of person fit. In: GH Fischer, IW Molenaar (eds). Rasch Models-Foundation, Recent Developments and Applications. New York: Springer, 1995; 97-110.
  • Molenaar IW, Hoijtink H. Person-fit and the Rasch model, with an application to knowledge of logical quantors. Applied Measurement in Education 1996; 9: 27-46.
  • Nagi SZ. Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In: AM Pope, AR Tarlov (eds). Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991; 309-327.
  • Coster WJ, Haley SM. Conceptualization and measurement of disablement in infants and young children. Infants and Young Children 1992; 4: 11-22.
  • Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Social Science and Medicine 1994; 38: 1 -14.
  • Butler C, Chambers H, Goldstein M, Harris S, Leach J, Campbell S, Adams R, Darrah J. Evaluating research in developmental disabilities: a conceptual framework for reviewing treatment outcomes. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1999; 41: 55-59.
  • Mannerkorpi K, Ekdahl C. Assessment of functional limitation and disability in patients with fibromyalgia. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology 1997; 26: 4-13.
  • Net Jvd, Prakken ABJ, Helders PJM, Berge Mt, Herwaarden Mv, Sinnema G, Wilde EJd, Kuis W. Correlates of disablement in polyarticular juvenile chronic arthritis-A cross-sectional study. British Journal of Rheumatology 1996; 35: 91-100.
  • Engelbert RHH, Pruys JEH, Beemer FA, Helders PJM. Osteogenesis imperfecta in childhood, treatment strategies-review article. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998; 79: 15901594.
  • Simeonsson RJ, Lollar D, Hollowell J, Adams M. Revision of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps-developmental issues. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2000:53: 113-124.
  • Brouwers-de Jong EA, Burgmeijer RJF, Laurent de Angulo MS (eds). Ontwikkelingsonderzoek op het consultatiebureau. Assen: Van Gorcum and Comp, 1996; 248-249.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.