Women on sickness absence—views of possibilities and obstacles for returning to work. A focus group study

References

• 2002:11. Svensk sjukfra°nvaro i ett europeiskt perspektiv (Swedish sickness absence in an European perspective). Stockholm: Riksfo¨ r- sa¨ kringsverket (Swedish National Insurance Board), 2002.
   Google Scholar
• 2002:5. Handlingsplan fo¨r o¨kad ha¨lsa i arbetslivet (Plan of action for increased health in working life). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet (Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs), 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Persson G, Bostro¨ m G, Diderichsen F, Lindberg G, Pettersson B, Rose´ n M, Stenbeck M, Wall S. Health in Sweden—The National Public Health Report 2001. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2001; 58: 1– 239.
   Google Scholar
• Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H. Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem? Social Science and Medicine 1996; 42: 617– 624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensing G, Alexanderson K, Allebeck P, Bjurulf, P. Sick-leave due to psychiatric disorder: higher incidence among women and longer duration for men. British Journal of Psychiatry 1996; 169: 740– 746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikman A. Labour market development in Sweden. In: S Marklund (ed) Worklife and health in Sweden 2000. Solna: Swedish Work Environment Authority and National Institute of Working Life, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg U, Ma° rdberg B, Frankenhaeuser M. The total workload of male and female white collar workers as related to age, occupational level, and number of children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 1994; 35: 315– 327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerdingen D, McGovern P, Bekker M, Lundberg U, Willemsen T. Women’s work roles and their impact on health, well-being, and career: comparisons between the United States, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Women and Health 2000; 31: 1– 20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O¨ stlin P. Gender inequalities in health: the significance of work In: SP Wamala, J Lynch (eds) Gender and social inequities in health. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2002; 43–65.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro V, Shi L. The political context of social inequalities and health. Social Science and Medicine 2001; 52: 481– 491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourbonnais R, Mondor M. Job strain and sickness absence among nurses in the province of Quebec. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2001; 39: 194– 202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausner-Dorsch H, Eaton WW. Psychosocial work environment and depression: epidemiologic assessment of the demand-control model. American Journal of Public Health 2000; 90: 1765– 1770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North FM, Syme SL, Feeney A, Shipley M, Marmot M. Psychosocial work environment and sickness absence among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. American Journal of Public Health 1996; 86: 332– 340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomingas A, Theorell T, Michelsen H, Nordemar R. Associations between self-rated psychosocial work conditions and musculoske- letal symptoms and signs. Stockholm MUSIC I Study Group. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 1997; 23: 130– 139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly M. Occupational therapy can be one of the great ideas of 20th century medicine, 1961 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1962; 16: 1– 9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yerxa EJ. Health and the human spirit for occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998; 52: 412– 418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszenmihalyi M. Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and game. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Po¨ rn I. Health and adaptedness. Theoretical Medicine 1993; 14: 295– 303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bra¨ nholm IB, Eklund M, Fugl-Meyer KS, Fugl-Meyer AR. On work and life satisfaction. Journal of Rehabilitation Science 1991; 4: 29– 34.
   Google Scholar
• Wandell PE, Brorsson B, A° berg H. Psychic and socioeconomic consequences with diabetes compared to other chronic conditions. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 1997; 25: 39– 43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 1994; 16: 103– 121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin Ivanoff S. Focus group discussions as a tool for developing a health education programme for elderly persons with visual impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2002; 9: 3– 9.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Focus group. A practical guide for applied research. California: Sage Publications, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Quality control in focus group research. In: DL Morgan (ed) Successful focus group. Advancing the state of the art. California: Sage Publication, 1993; 65–85.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin Ivanoff S, Sjo¨ strand J, Klepp KI, Axelsson Lind L, Lundgren Lindquist B. Planning a health education programme for the elderly visually impaired person-a focus group study. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 515– 522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Cooper BA, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The Person-Environment-Occupational Model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1996; 63: 9– 23.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn W, Brown C, McGuigan A. The ecology of human performance: a framework for considering the effect of context. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1994; 48: 595– 607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszenmihalyi M. Finding flow. The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Michie S. Williams S. Reducing work related psychological ill health and sickness absence: a systematic literature review. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003; 60: 3– 9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahtera J, Kivima¨ ki M, Pentti J, Theorell T. Effect of change in the psychosocial work environment on sickness absence: a seven year follow up of initially healthy employees. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2000; 54: 484– 493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigos SJ, Battie MC, Spengler DM, Fisher LD, Fordyce WE, Hansson TH, Nachemson AL, Wortley MD. A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. Spine 1991; 16: 1– 6.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhauser RV, Butler JS, Yang WK. The importance of employer accomodation on the job duration of workers with disabilities: a hazard model approach. Labour Economics 1995; 2: 109– 130.
   Google Scholar
• Strunin L, Boden LI. Paths of reentry: employment experiences of injured workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2000; 38: 373– 384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander J, Marnetoft SU, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Return to work following vocational rehabilitation for neck, back and shoulder problems: risk factors reviewed. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 704– 712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamala SP, Mittleman MA, Horsten M, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Orth-Gomer K. Job stress and the occupational gradient in coronary heart disease risk in women. The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. Social Science and Medicine 2000; 51: 481– 489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth-Gomer K, Wamala SP, Horsten M, et al. Marital stress worsens prognosis in women with coronary heart disease: The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. JAMA 2000; 284: 3008– 3014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensing G, Alexanderson K. The relation of adult experience of domestic harassment, violence and sexual abuse to health and sickness absence. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2000; 7: 1– 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg U, Frankenhaeuser M. Stress and workload of men and women in high-ranking positions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 1999; 4: 142– 151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar