How can a work rehabilitation process be improved?—a qualitative study from the perspective of social insurance officers

References

• Prop 1990/91:140. Regeringens proposition om arbetsmiljo¨ och rehabilitering. (In Swedish) (Work environment and rehabilita- tion). Stockholm, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• SoS- rapport 1993:10. Rehabilitering inom ha¨ lso- och sjukva° rden, fo¨ r alla a° ldrar och diagnoser (Rehabilitation in health and care, regarding all ages and diagnoses) Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Keith RA. Conceptual bases of outcome measures. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1995; 74(1): 73– 80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Bra¨ nnholm IB, Fugl-Meyer K. Om tillfredssta¨ l- lelse, lycka och rehabilitering. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift 1992, 1: 33– 41.
   Google Scholar
• Lindkvist R. Work, sickness and rehabilitation. In: S Marklund (ed) Rehabilitation in a Political Perspective. Lund: Studentlitter- atur, 1992; 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gard G. Balansen mellan arbetets krav och individens kapacitet— en bas fo¨ r bedo¨ mning av arbetsfo¨ rma° ga. Arbete, Ma¨nniska, Miljo¨ & Nordisk Ergonomi 1998; 1: 29– 35.
   Google Scholar
• WHO International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. A manual of classification relating to consequences of disease, Geneva, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1988:41. Tidig och samordnad rehabilitering (Early and coordinated rehabilitation). Stockholm, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppsson-Grassman E. The demands of work and individual suffering. Report 57 in social sciences, Stockholm University, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1995; 62: 250– 257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jakobsson B, Schuldt Ha° a° rd U, Bergroth A, Selander J, Ekholm J. Improved cooperation in vocational rehabilitation with systematic rehabilitation group meetings. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(14): 734– 740.
   Google Scholar
• Berglind H, Gerner U. Motivation and return to work among the long-term sicklisted: anaction theory perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(14): 719– 726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson G, Setterlind S. About coping in life. FOU report 41, Malmo¨ .Team Offset, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Selander MA, Marnetoft SU, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. The process of vocational rehabilitation for employed and unemployed people on sick-leave. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1998; 30: 55– 60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edlund C, Dahlgren L. The physician’s role in the vocational rehabilitation process. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(14): 727– 733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstro¨ m L-G, Eriksen T. Can differences in benefit levels explain duration and outcome of sickness absence? Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(14): 713– 718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander J, Marnetoft S U, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Return to work following vocational rehabilitation for neck, back and shoulder problems: riskfactors reviewed. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(14): 704– 712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Den Kvalitativa Forskningsintervjun (InterViews). Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1997; 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Telling stories: narrative approaches in qualitative studies. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1991; 23: 161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. New- bury Park, California: Sage Publications, 1990; 381–383.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard P. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today 1991; 11: 461– 466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downe-Wamboldt B. (1992) Content analysis: method, applica- tions, and issues. Health Care for Women International 1992; 13: 313– 321.
   Google Scholar
• So¨ derberg S, Lundman B. Transition experienced by women with fibromyalgia. Health Care for Women International 2001; 22: 617– 631.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods NF, Catanzaro M. (1988) Nursing Research. Theory and Practice. C.V. Washington, DC: Mosby Company, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Winberg, S. Working environment and rehabilitation with the workplace as a basis. Swedish Journal of Social Medicine 1997; 5: 8– 9.
   Google Scholar
• Schuldt Ha° a° rd U, Jakobsson B, Ka¨ rrholm J, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Clients views about rehabilitation in cooperation between occuaptional health care, community care and the social insurance company. Swedish Journal of Social Medicine 2001; 6: 517– 531.
   Google Scholar
• Rivano-Fisher M, Tuvfesson B. Characteristics and evaluation of rehabilitation processes. Lund-Orup rehabilitation centre, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 1997:18–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gard G. Work motivating factors in rehabilitation: A brief review. Physical Therapy Reviews 2001; 6: 85– 89.
   Google Scholar
• Grahn B. Quality of life, motivation and costs in multidisciplinary occupational rehabilitation. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Physical Therapy, Lund University, Sweden, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gard G, Gille K.A°. Functional activities and psychosocial factors in the rehabilitation of patients with low back pain. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2000; 14: 75– 81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannerkorpi K. Assessment and Treatment of Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome. Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Physical Therapy, Lund University, Sweden, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gard G, Sandberg AC. Motivating factors for return to work. Physiotherapy Research International 1998; 3: 100– 108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw L, Segal R, Polatajko H, Harburn K. Understanding return to work behaviours: promoting the importance of individual perceptions in the study of return to work. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannemark B, Kullberg, B. Cooperation – a new type of work in the Welfare state. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson B, Schuldt Ha° a° rd U, Bergroth A, Selander J, Ekholm J. Improved cooperation between organisations in work rehabilita- tion. Swedish Journal of Social Medicine 2001; 6: 506– 516.
   Google Scholar
• Grape O. Between the Stick and the Carrot. A case study of the rehabilitation reform in 1992. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Umea° University, Umea°, Sweden, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cardol M,De Jong BA,Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 24(18): 970– 974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar