A pilot study of functional access to public buildings and facilities for persons with impairments

References

• Brandt EN, Pope AM. Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Patla AE, Shumway-Cook A. Dimensions of Mobility: Defining the Complexity and Difficulty Associated with Community Mobility. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity 1999; 7: 7– 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM. Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. Physical Therapy 1994; 74: 380– 386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satariano WA. Editorial: The Disabilities of Aging—Looking to the Physical Environment. American Journal of Public Health 1997; 87: 331– 332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie R, Wells P. Planning and disability: creating a barrier-free environment. Town and Country Planning 1992; 61: 278– 280.
   Google Scholar
• Pope AM, Tarlov AR (eds) Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research; Correction for Final Long-Range Plan for Fiscal Years 1999 – 2003; Notice. 1999; 64.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICIDH-2: International Classification of Functioning and Disability. Beta-2 draft, Full version. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl TH. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: An Introduction and Discussion of its Potential Impact on Rehabilitation Services and Research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2002; 34: 201– 204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council on Disability. Achieving Independence: The Challenge of the 21st Century, A Decade of Progress in Disability Policy, Setting and Agenda for the Future. National Council on Disability, Washington, DC, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Smith A (ed). Americans with Disabilities Act: ADA Compliance Guide. Tampa, Florida: Thompson Publishing Group, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein R. Federal Disability Policy Framework Reflecting the Nation’s Goals Relating to People with Disabilities as Articulated in the Americans with Disabilities Act. The George Washington University Medical Center, Center for the Study and Advancement of Disability Policy, Washington, DC, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute Inc. Specifications for Making Buildings and Facilities Accessible to, and Usable by, the Physically Handicapped, Approved Oct 31. New York, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute Inc. American national standard specifications for making buildings and facilities accessible to, and usable by, the physically handicapped. Author, New York, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. Making Buildings and Facilities Accessible to and Usable by the Physically Handicapped. New York, 1961, reaffirmed in 1971.
   Google Scholar
• General Services Administration DoD, Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Postal Service. Uniform federal accessibility standards. 1984; 49: 31529–31624.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Compliance. Section 210—Congressional Accountability Act: Report on Inspections For Compliance With The Public Access Provisions In the Americans With Disabilities Act.
   Google Scholar
• GAO. Americans With Disabilities Act: Initial Accessibility Good But Important Barriers Remain. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• GAO. Americans with Disabilities Act—Effects of the Law on Access to Goods and Services. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Select Education and Civil Rights, Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Louis Harris and Associates Inc. N.O.D./Harris Survey of Americans with Disabilities. Commissioned by the National Organization of Disability, New York, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• McClain L, Cram A, Wood J, Taylor M, Taylor ??. Wheelchair Accessibility—Living the Experience: Function in the Community. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1998; 18: 25– 43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin LM. Wheelchair accessibility of Public Buildings in Utica, New York. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1987; 41: 217– 221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain L, Beringer D, Kuhnert H, et al. Restaurant wheelchair accessibility. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1993; 47: 619– 623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain L, Todd C. Food store accessibility. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1990; 44: 487– 491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn HC, McGovern EE, Walk EE, Edlich RF. Architectural barriers to persons with disabilities in businesses in an urban community. J Burn Care Rehabil 1994; 15: 176– 179.
   Google Scholar
• Grabois EW, Nosek MA, Rossi DC. Accessibility of primary care physicians offices for people with disabilities: An analysis of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Archives Family Medicine 1999; 8: 44– 51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose KA. A survey of accessibility to chiropractic clinics to the disabled. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological therapeutics 1999; 22: 523– 529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavery I, Davey S, Woodside A, Ewart K. The vital role of street design and management in reducing barriers to older people’s mobility. Landscape and Urban Planning 1996; 35: 181– 192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge RG. Geography and the disabled: A survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1993; 18: 63– 85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge RG. Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In: Golledge RG (ed) Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins Uni- versity Press, 1999; 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis JM, Kalatzky R, Golledge RG, Cicinelli JG, Pellegrino JW, Fry PA. Nonvisual navigation by the blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993; 122: 73– 91.
   Google Scholar
• Marston JR, Golledge RG. Improving Transit Access for the Blind and Vision Impaired http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/PATH/Re- search/Featured/1098/Featured10-98.html. Intellimotion; 7.2.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips JM. Overcoming distance as a barrier. In: Crewe NM, Zola IK (eds) Independent Living for Physically Disabled People. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass, 1983; 113–119.
   Google Scholar
• Cope JG, Allred LJ, Morsell JM. Signs as deterrents of illegal parking in spaces designated for individuals with physical disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991; 24: 59– 63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapar N. Changing Activity Spaces of Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Geography. Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Barrier Free Environments Inc, Adaptive Environments Center Inc. Checklist for Existing Facilities Version 2.1. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Chard G, Couch R. Access to higher education for the disabled student: A building survey at the University of Liverpool. Disability and Society 1998; 13: 603– 623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fange A, Iwarsson S, Persson A. Accessibility to the public environment as perceived by teenagers with functional limitations in a south Swedish twon centre. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 318– 326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahana E. A Conguence model of person-environment interaction. In: Lawton MP, Windley P, Byerts T (eds) Aging and the environment: Theretical approaches. New York: Springer, 1982; 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton MP, Windley PG, Byerts TO (eds) Aging and the Environment: Theoretical Approaches. New York: Springer, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton MP. Environmental taxonomy: generalizations from research with older adults. In: Friedman SL, Wachs TD (eds) Measuring Environment Across the Life Span: Emerging Methods and Concepts. Washington, DC: American Psychological Associa- tion, 1999; 91–124.
   Google Scholar
• Ga¨ rling T. Introductions – conceptualizations of human environ- ments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1998; 18: 69– 73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos RH. Specialized living environments for older people: a conceptual framework for evaluation. Journal of Social Issues 1980; 36: 75– 94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachs TD. Celebrating complexity: conceptualization and assess- ment of the environment. In: Friedman SL, Wachs TD (eds) Measuring Environment Across the Life Span: Environment Emer- ging Methods and Concepts. Washington, DC: American Psycho- logical Association, 1999; 357–392.
   Google Scholar
• Altman I, Rogoff B. World views in psychology. Handbook of Environmental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1987; 7–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan S. A model of person-environment compatability. Environ- ment and Behavior 1983; 15: 311– 332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning H. Environmental Occupational Therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1972; 26: 292– 298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: A Transactive Approach to Occupational Performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1996; 63: 9– 23.
   Google Scholar
• Letts L, Law M, Rigby P, Cooper B, Stewart D, Strong S. Person- environment assessments in Occupational Therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1994; 48: 608– 618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris-Baker C, Willems EP. Environmental Negotiability as a direct measurement of behavior-environment relationships: some implications for theory and practice. In: Seidel AD, Danford S (eds) Environmental Design: Research, Theory and Application. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA 10). Washington, DC: Environmental Design Research Association, 1979; 209–214.
   Google Scholar
• Useh U, Moyo AM, Munyonga E. Wheelchair accessibility of public buildings in the central business district of Harare Zimbabwe. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23: 490– 496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Charlifue S, Gerhart KA, Overholser J, Richardson G. Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilita- tion outcomes. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation 1992; 73: 519– 526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GC, et al. Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors, Version 1. Instrument and Scoring Manual from Authors. Craig Hospital, 3425 South Clarkson St., Englewood, CO 80110 (303-789-8202), 2000.
   Google Scholar
• US Access Board. Americans with Disabilities Act: Accessbility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG). Washington, DC, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Gray DB, Hendershot GE. The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81: S10– S14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards JMJ. Units of Analysis and the individual differences fallacy in environmental research. Environment and Behavior 1990; 22: 307– 319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards JM. Units of Analysis, Measurement Theory, and Environmental Assessment: A Response and Clarification. Envir- onment and Behavior 1996; 28: 220– 236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine DW. True scores, error, reliability, and unit of analysis in environment and behavior research. Environment and Behavior 1994; 26: 261– 293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
   Google Scholar