Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives

References

• World Health Organization. International Classification of Func- tioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Social Science & Medicine 1994; 38: 1– 14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P. Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process: Quebec contributions relating to ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 145– 153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provincial Rehabilitation Reference Group. Managing the Seams: Making the Rehabilitation System Work for People. Toronto, Ontario: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, 2000; 1–67.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons T. Social structure an dynamic process: the case of modern medical practice. In: T Parsons (ed) The Social System. New York: The Free Press, 1951; 428–479.
   Google Scholar
• Haug MR, Lavin B. Practitioner or patient – who’s in charge? Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 1981; 22: 212– 222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht GL. The Disability Business: Rehabilitation in America. Newbury Park, California: Sage Library of Social Research, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Muir Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal 1996; 312: 71– 72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards A, Elwyn G (eds) Evidence-based Patient Choice: Inevitable or Impossible? Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2001; 3 – 18.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan M. The doctor patient relationship. In: G Scambler (ed) Sociology as Applied to Medicine (4th edn). London: W.B. Saunders, 2000; 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Cardol M, De Jong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participa- tion in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 970– 974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Stanton S, Law M, Polatajko H, Baptiste S, Ythompson-Franson T, Kramer C, Swedlove F, Brintnell S, Campanile L. Enabling Occupation: An Occupational Therapy Perspective. Ottawa: AOT Publications ACE, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centeredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science and Medicine 2000; 51: 1087– 1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Brown J, Weston W, McWhinney I, McWilliam C, Freeman T (eds) Patient-Centred Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method. London: Sage, 1995; 191–203.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher S. Surviving redesign: basic concepts of patient-focused care and their application to WOC nursing. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 1997; 24: 132– 136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston CL, Cooper PK. Patient-focused care: What is it? Holistic Nursing Practice 1997; 11: 1– 7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers SM. Patient-focused care: What managers should know. Nursing Economics 1998; 16: 180– 188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell H, Jenner EA. The role of the nurse in patient-focused care: models of competence and implications for education and training. International Journal of Nursing Studies 1996; 33: 67– 75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millers N, Koop AJ. A person-oriented view of patient-centred care. Australian Nurses Journal 1984; 13: 38– 39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis-Hill CS, Horn S. Change in identity and self-concept: A new theoretical approach to recovery following a stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 2000; 14: 279– 287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafsteinsdottir TH, Grypdonck M. Being a stroke patient: a review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997; 26: 580– 588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snead SL, Davis JR. Attitudes of individuals with acquired brain injury towards disability. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 947– 953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness 1982; 4: 167– 182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charmaz K. The body, identity and self: Adapting to impairment. The Sociological Quarterly 1995; 36: 657– 680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin JM, Strauss A. Unending Work and Care: Managing Chronic Illness at Home. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles R, Ashburn A, Payne S, Murphy C. Patients’ expectations of recovery following stroke: A qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 841– 850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 1998; 12: 338– 347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients’ motivation for rehabilitation. British Medical Journal 2000; 321: 1051– 1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke MS. Patient and spouse perceptions of stroke and its rehabilitation. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2000; 23: 19– 29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley L, Delbanco T (eds) Through the Patient’s Eyes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes EC. Cycles, turning points and careers. In: EC Hughes (ed) The Sociological Eye. Chicago: Adline Atherton, 1971; 124–131.
   Google Scholar
• Bury MR. Meanings at risk: the experience of arthritis. In: R Anderson, M Bury (eds) Living with Chronic Illness: The Experience of Patients and their Families. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Research in the Sociology of Health Care 1983; 6: 283– 321.
   Google Scholar
• Bury MR. The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects. Sociology of Health and Illness 1991; 13: 451– 468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall VW. No Exit: An interpretive perspective on aging. In: VW Marshall (ed) Aging in Canada: Social Perspectives. Markham, Ontario: Fitzhenry & Whiteside, 1980; 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Status Passage. Chicago: Adline Atherton, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research Methods Series 16. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL, Krueger RA (eds). The Focus Group Kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson B, Cott CA, Jaglal S, Badley EM. Rehabilitation in Hospital Report 2001: Preliminary Studies Volume One. Toronto Ontario: Hospital Report Research Collaborative, 2001; 5–70.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide For Applied Research (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel JV, Kjoseth R, Seymour E. The Ethnograph: A User’s Guide. Littleton, Colorado: Qualis Research Associates, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference? Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy- revue Canadienne d Ergotherapie 1995; 62: 250– 257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sumsion T, Smyth G. Barrier to client-centredness and their resolution. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2000; 67: 15– 21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chewning B, Sleath B. Medication decision-making and manage- ment: a client-centred model. Social Science and Medicine 1996; 42: 389– 398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fife BL. The conceptualization of meaning in illness. Social Science and Medicine 1994; 38: 309– 316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opie A. ‘Nobody’s asked me for my view’: User’s empowerment by Multidisciplinary Health Teams. Qualitative Health Research 1998; 8: 188– 206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Community integration: Conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 1998; 4: 1– 15.
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle N. Clinical ethnography of lacunar stroke: implications for acute care. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 1991; 23: 235– 240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meltzer BN. Mead’s social psychology. In: JG Manis, BN Meltzer (eds) Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology (2nd edn). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1972; 4–22.
   Google Scholar
• Nolfe G, D’Aniello AM, Muschera R, Giaquinto S. The aftermath of rehabilitation for patients with severe stroke. Acta Neurologica Scandinavia 2003; 107: 281– 284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, Trabellesi M, Lubich S, Grasso MG. Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Cerebrovascular Disease 1998; 8: 228– 234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaquinto S, Buzzelli S, Di Francesco L, Lottarini A, Monenero P, Tonin P, Nolfe G. On the prognosis of outcome after stroke. Acta Neurological Scandinavia 1999; 100: 202– 208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert CCM, Powell GE. Insight and progress in rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 1989; 3: 125– 130.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. The concept of patient motivation: A qualitative analysis of stroke professionals’ atti- tudes. Stroke 2002; 33: 444– 448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupper A, Henley S. Predictive factors in stroke outcome and implications for intervention. International Journal of Rehabilita- tion Research 1987; 10: 119– 122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibbotson J. Motivation – The occupational therapist’s view. Phy- siotherapy 1978; 61: 189– 191.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM, Swanson JM, Kuzel AJ. The Nature of Qualitative Evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ford S, Schofield T, Hope T. What are the ingredients for a successful evidence-based patient choice consultation?: A qualita- tive study. Social Science and Medicine 2003; 56: 589– 602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greveson G, James O. Improving long-term outcome after stroke – the views of patients and carers. Health Trends 1991; 23: 161– 162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan DP, Cott C, Robertson D. ‘Conceptual Tools for Thinking about Inter-teamwork in Gerontology’. Educational Gerontology 1997; 23: 651– 668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer AM. Rehabilitation care and outcomes from the patient’s perspective. Medical Care 1997; 35(suppl.): JS48–JS57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerteis M, Roberts MJ. Culture, leadership, and service in the patient-centred hospital. In: M Gerteis et al (ed) Through the Patient’s Eyes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993; 227–259.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Understanding Disability. From Theory to Practice. London: MacMillan Press Ltd, 1996.
   Google Scholar