Late multidisciplinary rehabilitation in young people after stroke

References

• Kim P, Warren S, Madill H, Hadley M. Quality of life of stroke survivors. Quality of Life Research 1999;8:293–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, de Haan RJ, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke: the value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke 1997;28:1541–1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulch D, Perez I, Melbourn A, Kalra L. Randomized controlled trial of integrated (managed) care pathway for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2000;31:1929–1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke: stroke unit trialists’ collaboration. British Medical Journal 1997;314:1151–1159.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle- cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;354:191–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronning OM, Guldvog B. Outcome of subacute stroke rehabilitation. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 1998;29:779–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander H, Bugge C, Hagen S. What is the association between the different components of stroke rehabilitation and health outcomes? Clinical Rehabilitation 2001;15:207–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards SG, Thompson AJ, Losseff N, Playford ED. Short- ening inpatient stay for stroke. Lancet 2002;359:2205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan CW, McDonnell R, Johnson Z, O’Keeffe S, Crowe MJ. Hospital-based stroke care in Ireland: results from one regional register. Irish Journal of Medical Science 2000;169:30–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins D, McConaghy D, McMahon A, Howard D, O’Neill D, McCormack PM. An acute stroke service: potential to improve patient outcome without increasing length of stay. Irish Medical Journal 2000;93:84–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torenbeek M, Caulfield B, Garrett M, Van Harten W. Current use of outcome measures for stroke and low back pain rehabilitation in five European countries: first results of the ACROSS project. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2001;24:95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965;16:61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International Disability Studies 1988;10:61–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green J, Forster A, Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001;23:670–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1999;66:480–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke: the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2002;55:922–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MW, Visser-Meily JM, Gispen LS. Measuring nursing needs of stroke patients in clinical rehabilitation: a comparison of validity and sensitivity to change between the Northwick Park Dependency Score and the Barthel Index. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002;16:182–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor RJ, Cano SJ, Thompson AJ, Hobart JC. Exploring rating scale responsiveness: does the total score reflect the sum of its parts? Neurology 2004;62:1842–1844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975;12:189–198.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill D, O’Shea B, Walsh JB, Coakley D. Screening for dementia and delirium using an adapted Folstein Mini- Mental State Examination. Irish Medical Journal 1989;82:24–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state exam- ination: a comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 1992;40:922–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges KW, Goldberg DP. The validation of the GHQ-28 and the use of the MMSE in neurological in-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry 1986;148:548–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992;30:473–483.
   Google Scholar
• Blake C, Codd MB, O’Meara YM. The Short Form 36 (SF- 36) Health Survey: normative data for the Irish population. Irish Journal of Medical Science 2000;169:195–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire Among Stroke Patients. Stroke 1996;27:1812.
   Google Scholar
• de Haan R, Aaronson N, Limburg M, Hewer RL, van Crevel H. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke 1993;24:320–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Williams LS, Moran K, Thompson AJ. Quality of life measurement after stroke: uses and abuses of the SF-36. Stroke 2002;33:1348–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson E. Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2001;33:47–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS for Windows. Release 11.0 edition New Jersey: SPSS, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sim TC, Lum CM, Sze FK, Or KH, Sum C, Woo J. Outcome after stroke rehabilitation in Hong Kong. Clinical Rehabilitation 1997;11:236–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bennekom CA, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Responsiveness of the rehabilitation activities profile and the Barthel index. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1996;49:39–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MW, de Bruin A, de Witte L, Schrijvers A. The SIP68: a measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996;77:440–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Randomized controlled trials-a gold standard? Clinical Rehabilitation 1999;13: 453–455.
   Google Scholar
• Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. British Medical Journal 1996;312:1215–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson D, Thornton H, Turner-Stokes L. Can young severely disabled stroke patients regain the ability to walk independently more than three months post stroke? Clinical Rehabilitation 2000;14:538–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolfe G, D’Aniello AM, Muschera R, Giaquinto S. The aftermath of rehabilitation for patients with severe stroke. Acta Neurologica Scandanavia 2003;107:281–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman PJ. Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. Interna- tional Disabilities Studies 1990;12:119–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrucci L, Bandinelli S, Guralnik JM, Lamponi M, Bertini C, Falchini M, et al. Recovery of functional status after stroke. A postrehabilitation follow-up study. Stroke 1993;24:200–205.
   Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Grasso MG, Antonucci G, Bragoni M, Troisi E, Morelli D, et al. Mobility status after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: 1-year follow-up and prognostic factors. Ar- chives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;82:2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam M, Tonin P, Casson S, Ermani M, Pizzolato G, Iaia V, et al. The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke 1993;24:1186–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergner M, Rothman ML. Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection. Annual Review of Public Health 1987;8:191–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assesment of quality-of-life out- comes. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;334:835–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine 1993;118:622–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Geddes J, Chamberlain MA. The Barthel index: an ordinal score or interval level measure? Clinical Rehabilita- tion 1996;10:301–308.
   Google Scholar
• Grimby G, Gudjonsson G, Rodhe M, Sunnerhagen KS, Sundh V, Ostensson ML. The functional independence measure in Sweden: experience for outcome measurement in rehabilitation medicine. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabili- tation Medicine 1996;28:51–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar