Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation Volume 26, 2004 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
258
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Viable methods for evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes

Manoj Sharma School of Health, Physical Education & Recreation (HPER), University of Nebraska at Omaha (UNOmaha) & Walden University, Omaha, USACorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 326-334 | Accepted 01 Dec 2003, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • World Health Organisation (WHO). Resolution on disability, prevention and rehabilitation (A29.68) Geneva: WHO, 1976.
  • Thomas M, Thomas MJ. A discussion on the shifts and changes in community based rehabilitation in the last decade. Neurological Rehabilitation and Neural Repair 1999; 13: 185– 189.
  • Thomas M, Thomas MJ. A discussion on some controversies in community based rehabilitation. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilita- tion Journal 2002; 13: 1– 4.
  • Wirz S, Thomas M. Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes: a search for appropriate indicators. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2002; 25: 163– 171.
  • Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research. Principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1999.
  • O’Toole B. A community based rehabilitation programme for pre- school disabled children in Guyana. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1988; 11: 323– 334.
  • Mitchell R. The research base of community-based rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 1999; 21: 459– 468.
  • Morse JM, Swanson J, Kuzel AJ. The nature of qualitative evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001.
  • Sharma M. Qualitative research methods. In: KE Berg, RW Latin (eds) Essentials of modern research methods in health, physical education, and recreation. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2004.
  • Yin RK. Case study research, design, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
  • Stake RE. Case studies. In: NK Denzin, YS Lincoln (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994; 236–247.
  • Sharma M, Deepak S. A brief case study of community-based rehabilitation programme in Mongolia. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 2002; 13: 11– 18.
  • Fetterman DM, Kaftarian SJ, Wandersman A. (eds) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and account- ability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997.
  • Kivela SL. Problems in intervention and evaluation. A case report of a community-based rehabilitation and activation programme for the elderly and disabled. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 1985; 3: 137– 140.
  • Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000.
  • Yoon SS, Byles J. Perceptions of stroke in the general public and patients with stroke: a qualitative study. British Medical Journal (BMJ) 2002; 324: 1065– 1068.
  • Lopez JM, Lewis JA, Boldy DP. Evaluation of a Philippine community based rehabilitation programme. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 2000; 12: 85– 89.
  • Gilmore GD, Campbell MD. Needs assessment strategies for health education and health promotion. Madison, WI: Brown & Bench- mark, 1996.
  • Reed J, Pearson P, Douglas B, Swinburne S, Wilding H. Going home from hospital—an appreciative inquiry study. Health & Social Care in the Community 2002; 10: 36– 45.
  • Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning. An educa- tional and ecological approach. 3rd edn. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1999.
  • Tandan R, Brown LD. Organization building for rural develop- ment: An experiment in India. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 1981; 17: 172– 189.
  • Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum, 1970. 23 Sharma M, Deepak S. A participatory evaluation of community- based rehabilitation programme in North Central Vietnam. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23: 352– 358.
  • Kuipers P, Kendall E, Hancock T. Developing a rural community- based disability service: (I) service framework and implementation strategy. Australian Journal of Rural Health 2001; 9: 22– 28.
  • Kuipers P, Foster M, Carlson G, Moy J. Classifying client goals in community-based ABI rehabilitation: a taxonomy for profiling service delivery and conceptualizing outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25: 154– 162.
  • Finkenflugel HJ, Van Maanen V, Schut W, Vermeer A, Jelsma J, Moyo A. Appreciation of community-based rehabilitation by caregivers of children with a disability. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 255– 260.
  • Evans PJ, Zinkin P, Harpham T, Chaudury G. Evaluation of medical rehabilitation in community-based rehabilitation. Social Science and Medicine 2001; 53: 333– 348.
  • Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.