Performance of activities of daily living in multiple sclerosis

References

• Finlayson M, Winkler Impey M, Nicolle C, Edwards J. Self-care, productivity and leisure limitations of people with multiple sclerosis in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998; 65: 299– 308.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson KJ. Quality of life among persons with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers. Neurology 1997; 48: 74– 80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito-Leo´ n J, Morales JM, Rivera-Navarros J, Mitchell AJ. A review about the impact of multiple sclerosis on health-related quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25: 1291– 1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakim EA, Bakheit AM, Bryant TN, Roberts MW, McIntosh- Michaelis SA, Spackman AJ, Martin JP, McLellan DL. The social impact of multiple sclerosis—a study of 305 patients and their relatives. Disability and Rehabilitation 2000; 22: 288– 293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self- maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontolo- gist 1969; 9: 179– 186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell GV, Hawkins SA. An assessment of the spectrum of disability and handicap in a population in multiple sclerosis: a population-based study. Multiple Sclerosis 2001; 7: 111– 117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzke J. A proposal for a uniform minimal record of disability in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1981; 64(suppl. 87): 110–129.
   Google Scholar
• Mellerup E, Fog T, Raun N, Colville P, de Rham B, Hannah B, Kurtzke J. The socio-economic scale. Acta Neurologica Scandina- vica 1981; 64(suppl. 87): 130–138.
   Google Scholar
• Midgard R, Riise T, Nyland H. Impairment, disability and handicap in multiple sclerosis. A cross-sectional study in an incident cohort in Møre and Romsdal County, Norway. Journal of Neurology 1996; 243: 337– 344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez M, Siva A, Ward J, Stolp-Smith K, O’Brien P, KurlandL. Impairment, disability, and handicap in multiple sclerosis: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Neurology 1994; 44: 28– 33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M, Tashman JS. A uniform nation data system for medical rehabilitation. In: MJ Fuhrer (ed). Rehabilitation outcomes: Analysis and measurement. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing, 1987; 137–147.
   Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC, Hens MM. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1990; 71: 870– 875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 1997; 42: 236– 244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. Inpatient rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Do the benefits carry over into the community? Neurology 1999; 52: 50– 56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solari A, Filippini G, Gasco P, Colla L, Salmaggi A, La Mantia L, Farinolti M, Eoli M, Mendozzi L. Physical rehabilitation has a positive effect on disability in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology 1999; 52: 57– 62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doble SE, Fisk JD, Fisher AG, Ritvo PG, Murray TJ. Functional competence of community-dwelling persons with multiple sclerosis using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 843– 851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills: Volume I – Development, standardization, and administration manual. 5th edn. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press, Inc., 2003; 1 – 251.
   Google Scholar
• Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, Johnson KP, Sibley WA, Silberberg DH, Tourtellotte WW. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Annals of Neurology 1983; 13: 227– 231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Journal of Neurology 1983; 33: 1444– 1452.
   Google Scholar
• Doble SE. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of a process skills assessment. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1991; 11:8 –
   Google Scholar
• Kirkley KN, Fisher AG. Alternate forms reliability of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Journal of Outcome Measurement 1999; 1: 53– 70.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson SE, Fisher AG. A study to examine the relationship of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) to other tests of cognition and function. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1996; 59: 260– 263.
   Google Scholar
• Duran LJ, Fisher AG. Male and female performance on the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 1019– 1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doble SE, Fisk JD, MacPherson KM, Fisher AG, Rockwood K. Measuring functional competence in older persons with Alzheimer’s disease. International Psychogeriatrics 1997; 9: 25–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernspa° ng B, Fisher AG. Validation of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills for use in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1995; 2: 3– 9.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. The assessment of IADL motor skills: an application of many-faceted Rasch analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1993; 47: 319– 329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Many-faceted Rasch measurement, 2nd edn. Chicago: MESA, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson AJ. The effectiveness of neurological rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Develop- ment 2000; 37: 455– 461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharrack B, Hughes RAC, Soudain S, Dunn G. The psychometric properties of clinical rating scales used in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1999; 122: 141– 159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Putten JJMF, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. Journal of Neurology, Neuro- surgery and Psychiatry 1999; 66: 480– 484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sousa EA, Albert RH, Kalman B. Cognitive impairments in multiple sclerosis: a review. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and other Dementias 2002; 17: 23– 29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, Lovell LL, Harvey RL, McGuire JR, Diaz S. Impairment and disability: their relation during stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998; 79: 329– 335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Smith-Knapp K, Granger CV. Validity of the functional independence measure for persons with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 828– 834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman ML, Fisher AG, Duran L. Assessment of functional ability of people with Alzheimer’s disease. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 6: 111– 118.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen RA, Kessler HR, Fischer M. The Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS) as a predictor of impairments of functional activities of daily living in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 1993; 115: 132– 135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. (ed). A model of human occupation: Theory and application. 3rd edn. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002; 1–576.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen ME, Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81(suppl. 2): S21–S29.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke J, Unsworth C. Occupational Therapists’ conceptions of instrumental activities of daily living in relation to evaluation and intervention with older clients. Scandinavian Journal of Occupa- tional Therapy 1998; 5: 180– 191.
   Google Scholar