An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs

References

• Cutson TM, Bongiorni DR. Rehabilitation of the older lower limb amputee: A brief review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1996; 44(11): 1388–1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson GM, Schulz R, Bridges MW, Behan AM. Social and psychological factors in adjustment to limb amputation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 1994; 9: 249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Ham RO, Cotton LT. Limb Amputation: From Aetiology to Rehabilitation. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlin M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Scales (TAPES). Rehabilitation Psychology 2000; 45(2): 130–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann LW. The Psychological Rehabilitation of the Amputee. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Millstein SG, Heger H, Hunter GA. Prosthetic use in adult and upper limb amputees: A comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses. Prosthetics and Orthotics Interna- tional 1986; 10: 27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein RB, Walley OT. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation 1983; 64: 243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balance R, Wilson B, Harder JA. Factors affecting myoelectric prosthetic use and wearing patterns in the juvenile unilateral below- elbow amputee. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1989; 56(3): 132–137.
   Google Scholar
• Waters R, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H. Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1976; 58-A part 1: 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Khoury SA. Evaluation of amputees. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1983; 6(4): 449–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermodsson Y, Ekdahl C, Persson BM. Outcome after trans-tibial amputation for vascular disease—A follow-up after eight years. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 1998; 12(2): 73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilodeau S, Herbert R, DesRosiers J. Lower limb utilisation by elderly amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 2000; 24(2): 126–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakey JW. Body image: The lower-limb amputee. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 1997; 9(2): 58–66.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Hanspal R. Body image and patients with amputations: does the prosthesis maintain the balance? International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1998; 21(4): 355–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybarczyk BD, Nyenhuis DL, Nicholas JJ, Cash SM, Kaiser J. Body image, perceived social stigma, and the prediction of psychosocial adjustment to leg amputation. Rehabilitation Psychol- ogy 1995; 40(2): 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble D, Price D, Gilder R. Psychiatric disturbance following amputation. American Journal of Psychiatry 1954; 110: 609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilder P. The Image and Appearance of the Human Body. New York: International Press, 1935/1950.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger M. Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row. [Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson], 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M. The Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. [Translated by C. Smith], 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde D. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Leder D. The Absent Body. London: The University of Chicago Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kujundzic N, Buschert, W. Instruments and the body: Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Research in Phenomenology 1994; 24: 206–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarry E. The merging of bodies and artifacts in the social contract. In: G Bender, T Druckery (eds) Culture on the Brink: Ideologies of Technology. Seattle: Bay Press, 1994; 85–97.
   Google Scholar
• Churcher J. Implications and applications of Piaget’s sensorimotor concepts. In: OG Selfridge, EL Rissland, MA Arbib (eds) Adaptive Control of Ill-Defined Systems. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1984; 289–304.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan TB, Mann RW. Design of control devices for people with motor impairment. Human Factors 1978; 20(3): 321–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser C. Does an artificial limb become part of the user? British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1984; 47(2): 43–45.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell PM. Developmental response to limb deficiency and limb replacement. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1988; 42(2): 120–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell PM, Scott R, Dickerson J, Theriault R, Wood B. Do artificial limbs become part of the user? New evidence. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Deviancy 1989; 26(2): 17–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith JA. Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In: J Smith, R Harre, LV Langenhove (eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Murray CD, Sixsmith J. E-mail: A qualitative research medium for interviewing? International Journal of Social Research Methodology Theory and Practice 1998; 1(2): 103–121.
   Google Scholar
• Murray CD, Sixsmith J. Qualitative health research via the Internet: Practical and methodological issues. Health Informatics 2002; 8: 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Jarman M, Osborn M. Doing interpretative phenom- enological analysis. In: M Murray, K Chamberlain (eds) Qualita- tive Health Psychology: Theories and Methods. London: Sage, 1999; 218–240.
   Google Scholar