Consequences of stroke, arthritis and chronic pain—are there important similarities?

References

• World Health Organisation International classification of Impair- ments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva, WHO, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation International classification of Impair- ments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva, WHO, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation International classification of Impair- ments, Disabilities and Handicaps (Beta Draft). Geneva, WHO, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation International Classification of Function- ing Disability and Health (Final Draft). Geneva, World Health Organisation, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Persson L, Berglund K, Sahlberg D. Psychological factors in chronic rheumatic diseases-a review. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology 1999; 28: 137–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson KM, Brander P, Taylor WJ, et al. Living with arthritis-what is important? Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23(16): 706–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters DJ. Disablement observed, addressed, and experienced: integrating subjective experience into disablement models. Dis- ability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 593–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Theories of disability in health practice and research. British Medical Journal 1998; 317: 1446–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, et al. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science & Medicine 1999; 48: 1173–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 1998; 12: 338–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray L. Evidence and outcomes: agendas, presuppositions and power. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1999; 30: 1017–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GAM, et al. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participa- tion and Autonomy (IPA). Clinical Rehabilitation 1999; 13: 411–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters DJ. Human experience in disablement: the imperative of the ICIDH. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17(3): 135–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrer MJ. Subjective well-being: implications for medical rehabilitation outcomes and models of disablement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 73(5): 358–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances in rehabilitation. British Medical Journal 2000; 320: 1385–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. ‘‘Discovering’’ chronic illness: using grounded theory. Social Science & Medicine 1990; 30: 1161–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas J. Ethical considerations of goal setting for patient care in rehabilitation medicine. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2002; 72: 228–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research 1999; 34: 1189–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• QSR. NUD*IST. [4.0]. 1997. Melbourne, Australia, Qualitative Solutions and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal 2000; 320: 50–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism 1988; 31: 315–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson M, Gaston-Johansson F. Pain intensity and health locus of control: a comparison of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. Patient Education and Coun- seling 1996; 29: 179–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlin AM, Badura AS, Fleischer TD, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain patients: its efficacy in changing patient locus of control. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81: 739–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker G, Kaufman SR. Managing an uncertain illness trajectory in old-age. Patients and physicians views of stroke. Medical Anthropological Quarterly 1995; 9: 165–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Social Science & Medicine 2000; 50: 495–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2001; 33: 273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. How do stroke units improve patient outcomes-a collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials. Stroke 1997; 28: 2139–2144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra L, Evans A, Perez I, et al. Alternative strategies for stroke care: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 894–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope DN. The effectiveness of traumatic brain injury rehabilita- tion: a review. Brain Injury 1995; 9(7): 649–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Cope DN. The benefit of rehabilitation in traumatic brain injury: a literature review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1995; 19(1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High WM, Boake C, Lehmkuhl LD. Critical analysis of studies evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1995; 19(1): 14–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronow HU. Rehabilitation effectiveness with severe brain injury: Translating research into policy. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1987; 2: 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson KM, Donovan K, McNaughton HM. A review of the effectiveness of rehabilitation. New Zealand Journal of Physiother- apy 2000; 28: 1–11.
   Google Scholar