Effects of phonemic awareness instruction on the encoding skills of children with severe speech impairment

References

• Bishop K, Rankin J, Mirenda P. Impact of graphic symbol use on reading acquisition. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1994; 10: 113– 125.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver DA, Coleman PP, Kalman SL, Yoder DE. The implications of emergent literacy research for children with developmental disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1991; 1: 38– 44.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken M, Bersani H. Speaking Up and Spelling it Out: Personal Essays on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MM. Reading abilities of non-speaking students: Two case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1992; 8: 57– 66.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver DA, Yoder DE. Literacy issues in persons with severe speech and physical impairments. In: R Gaylord-Ross (ed) Issues and Research in Special Education Vol. New York: Teacher’s College Press, 1992; 156–201.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MM, Blischak DM. Literacy. In: LL Lloyd, DR Fuller, HH Arvidson (eds) Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Handbook of Principles and Practices. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1997; 414–444.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE. Refining the phonological core deficit model. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review 1998; 3: 17– 21.
   Google Scholar
• Shaywitz S. Overcoming Dyslexia: A New and Complete Science- Based Program for Reading Problems at any Level. New York: AA Knopf, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Adams MJ. Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer WE, Nesdale AR. Phonemic segmentation skill and beginning reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 1985; 77: 417– 527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri LC, Wilce LS. Does learning to spell help beginners learn to read words? Reading Research Quarterly 1987; 22: 47– 65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhri JK, Shepherd MJ. Segmentation, spelling instruction as part of a first grade reading program: Effects on several measures of reading. Reading Research Quarterly 1993; 28: 218– 233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhri JK. The spelling/reading connection and dyslexia: Can spelling be used to teach the alphabetic strategy? In: RM Joshi, CK Leong (eds) Reading Disabilities: Diagnosis and Component Processes. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993; 253–266.
   Google Scholar
• Lindamood CH, Lindamood PC. Lindamood Auditory Conceptua- lization Test. Boston: Teaching Resources Corporation, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Mann VA. Longitudinal predictions and prevention of early reading difficulty. Annals of Dyslexia 1984; 34: 115– 136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner J, Simon DP. The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1971; 4: 384– 392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti CA, Hogaboam TW. The relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 1975; 67: 461– 469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stackhouse J. Barrier to literacy development in children with speech and language difficulties. In: DVM Bishop, LB Leonard (eds) Speech and Language Impairments in Children. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 2000; 73–97.
   Google Scholar
• Gillon GT. The efficacy of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 2000; 36: 126– 141.
   Google Scholar
• Gillon GT. Follow-up study investigating the benefits of phono- logical awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 2002; 37: 381– 400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat P, Griffin CC, Sindelar T. Phonological awareness instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly 2003; 26: 73– 87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohn WE, Ehri LC. Do alphabet letters help pre-readers acquire phonemic segmentation skills? Journal of Education Psychology 1983; 75: 752– 762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball EW, Blachman BA. Phoneme segmentation training: Effects on reading readiness. Annals of Dyslexia 1988; 38: 208– 225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers KO, Lombardino LJ, Thompson CK. Effects of phonolo- gical decoding training on children’s word recognition of CVC, CV, VC structures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathol- ogy 1996; 5: 67– 78.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers KO, Lombardino LJ. Generalization of early metalinguistic skills in a phonological decoding study with first-graders at risk for reading failure. International Journal of Language & Communica- tion Disorders 1998; 33: 369– 391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg AD, Hjelmquist E. Phonological awareness and literacy abilities in nonspeaking preschool children with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1996; 12: 138– 153.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg AD. Reading and spelling, phonological awareness, and working memory in children with severe speech impairments: A longitudinal study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2001; 17: 11– 26.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelden M, Seigel L. Phonological processing and literacy in AAC users and students with motor speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1999; 15: 191– 211.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop DMV. Spelling ability in congenital dysarthria. Evidence against articulatory coding in translating between phonemes and graphemes. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1985; 2: 229– 251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop DVM, Robson J. Accurate non-word spelling despite congenital inability to speak: Phoneme-grapheme conversion does not require subvocal articulation. British Journal of Psychology 1989; 80: 1– 13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley BE, Pollatsek A. Phonological processing and reading abilities in adolescents and adults with severe congenital speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1999; 15: 156– 173.
   Google Scholar
• Blischak DM, Gorman A, Lombardino LJ. Application of current literacy theory, research, and clinical practice to AAC users. In: RW Schlosser (ed) The Efficacy of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Towards Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Academic Press, 2003; 427–448.
   Google Scholar
• McReynolds LV, Thompson CK. Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part I: Review of the basics of single-subject designs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1986; 51: 194– 203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kearns KP. Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part II: Design selection and arrangement of experimental phases. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1986; 51: 204– 214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtis ME. Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 1980; 72: 656– 669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE, Cunningham AE, Freeman DJ. Intelligence, cognitive skills, early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly 1984; 19: 278– 303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn LM, Dunn LM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. 3rd edn. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Brown L, Sherbenou R, Johnsen S. Test of Nonverbal Intelligence. 2nd edn. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Horner RD, Baer DM. Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1978; 11: 189– 196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri LC. Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading 1995; 18: 116– 125.
   Google Scholar
• Blischak DM. Phonologic awareness: Implications for individuals with little or no functional speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1994; 10: 245– 254.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelden MC, Siegel LS. Phonological processing in written word learning: Assessment for children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Commu- nication 2001; 17: 37– 51.
   Google Scholar
• Blischak DM. Increases in natural speech production following experience with synthetic speech. Journal of Special Education Technology 1999; 14: 44– 53.
   Google Scholar