Cemented versus uncemented hip replacement for fracture of the hip

References

• Lorich DG, Geller DS, Nielson JH. Osteoporotic pertrochan- teric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 398–410.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings SR, Rubin SM, Black D. The future of hip fractures in the United States. Numbers, costs, and potential effects of post-menopausal estrogen. Clin Orthop 1990; 252: 163–166.
   Google Scholar
• Haentjens P, Autier P, Barette M, Boonen S. The economic cost of hip fractures among elderly women. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 493–500.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical classifications for health policy research: Hospital inpatient statistics/healthcare cost and utilization project, 1996. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD. Predictors of functional recovery after hip fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop 1998; 348: 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Roden M, Schon M, Fredin H. Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: A randomised minimum 5-year follow-up study of screws and bipolar hemiarthroplasty in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74(1):42–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Obremskey W, Koval KJ, et al. Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A Meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1673–1681.
   Google Scholar
• Su H, Aharonoff GB, Hiebert R, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ. In-hospital mortality after femoral neck fracture: Do internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty differ? Am J Orthop 2003; 32(3):151–155.
   Google Scholar
• Tidermark J, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Soderqvist A, Tornkvist H. Internal fixation compared with total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85(3):380–388.
   Google Scholar
• Parker MJ, Khan RJ, Crawford J, Pryor GA. Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. A randomised trial of 455 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84(8):1150–1155.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrengart L, Tornkvist H, Fornander P, Thorngren KG, Pasanen L, Wahlstrom P, et al. A randomised study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures. Clin Orthop 2002; 401: 209–222.
   Google Scholar
• Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Gamma versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures. Meta-analysis of ten rando- mised trial. Int Orthop 1996; 20: 163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy DC, Descamps PY, Krallis P, Fabeck L, Smets P, Bertens CL, et al. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 618–630.
   Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Glousman R, Sew Hoy AL, Vanis R, Chandler R. Treatment of femoral neck fractures with total hip replace- ment versus cemented and non-cemented hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1986; 1(1):21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Khan RJ, Macdowell A, Crossman P, Datta A, Jallali N, Arch DN, et al. Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop. 2002; 26(4):229–232.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard JS, Amstutz HC, Zinar DM, Dorey FJ. A comparison of total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty for treatment of acute fracture of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop 1992; 282: 123–131.
   Google Scholar
• Tidermark J. Quality of life and femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74: 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Partanen J. Saarenpaa I, Heikkinen T, Wingstrand H, Thorngren KG, Jalovaara P. Functional outcome after displaced femoral neck fractures treated with osteosynthesis or hemiarthroplasty: a matched-pair study of 714 patients. Acta Othop Scand 2002; 73: 496–501.
   Google Scholar
• Wixson RL, Stulberg SD, Mehlhoff M. Total hip replacement with cemented, uncemented, and hybrid prostheses. A comparison of clinical and radiographic results at 2–4 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 257–270.
   Google Scholar
• Clohisy JC, Harris WH. Primary hybrid total hip replacement performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 247–255.
   Google Scholar
• McAuley JP, Moore KD, Culpepper II WJ, Engh CA. Total hip replacement with porous-coated prosthesis fixed without cement in patients who are sixty-five years of age or older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1648–1655.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz DP, Smith EJ, Harris WH. The prevalence of femoral osteolysis associated with components inserted with or without cement in total hip replacement. A retrospective matched-pair series. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 1121–1129.
   Google Scholar
• Barrack RL, Folgueras AJ. Revision total hip replacement: The femoral component. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995; 3(2):79–85.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney WJ, Krushell RJ, Jasty M, Harris WH. Incidence of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement: Effect of the type of fixation of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73(2):191–193.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TE, Larson B, Shen F, Moskal JT. Thigh pain after cementless total hip replacement: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002; 10(6):385–392.
   Google Scholar
• Lane JL, Nydick M. Osteoporosis: Current modes of prevention and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999; 7(1):19–31.
   Google Scholar