Assessment of arm/hand functioning in children with a congenital transverse or longitudinal reduction deficiency of the upper limb

References

• Dijk A J. Congenital reduction deficiencies of the upper extremities. J Rehabil Sci 1990; 3: 84–88
   Google Scholar
• d'Arcangelo M, Gupta A, Scheker L R. Radial Club Hand. The growing hand, A Gupta, A PJ Kay, L R Scheker. Mosby, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Davidson J. A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. J Hand Ther 2002; 15: 62–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tolsma M HJ, Meeuwisse-de Vries B, Pesch-Batenburg J MFB, Rol M, Arendzen J H, Roebroeck M E, Stam H J. Level of functioning of adolescents and young adults with a congenital reduction deficiency of the upper limb (in dutch). Revalidata 2003; 25: 18–21
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt S D, Varni J W, Seid M, Setoguchi Y. Functional status in limb deficiency: Development of an outcome measure for preschool children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 405–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Aaron D H, Jansen C W. Development of the functional dexterity test (FDT): Construction, validity, reliability, and normative data. J Hand Ther 2003; 16: 12–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pruitt S D, Varni J W, Setoguchi Y. Functional status in children with limb deficiency: Development and initial validation of an outcome measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1233–1238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penta M, Thonnard J L, Tesio L. ABILHAND: A Rasch-built measure of manual ability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1038–1042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth E J, Heinemann A W, Lovell L L, Harvey R L, McGuire J R, Diaz S. Impairment and disability: Their relation during stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 329–335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyper M A, Breedijk M, Mulders A H, Post M W, Prevo A J. Prosthetic management of children in The Netherlands with upper limb deficiencies. Prosthetics Orthotics Int 2001; 25: 228–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postema K, van der Donk V, van Limbeek J, Rijken R A, Poelma M J. Prosthesis rejection in children with a unilateral congenital arm defect. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 243–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amadio P C. Outcome assessment in hand surgery and hand therapy: An update. J Hand Ther 2001; 14: 63–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jutai J, Ladak N, Schuller R, Naumann S, Wright V. Outcomes measurement of assistive technologies: An institutional case study. Assistive Technol 1996; 8: 110–120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 171–178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakker J GM, Lankveld v W GJM, Pad Bosch v t P JI. SODA: an instrument to measure manual dexterity in patients with RA (in dutch). Ned Tijdschr Ergother 1995; 23: 44–49
   Google Scholar
• Arnould C, Penta M, Renders A, Thonnard J L. ABILHAND-Kids: A measure of manual ability in children with cerebral palsy. Neurology 2004; 63: 1045–1052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimby G, Andren E, Daving Y, Wright B. Dependence and perceived difficulty in daily activities in community-living stroke survivors 2 years after stroke: A study of instrumental structures. Stroke 1998; 29: 1843–1849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle Morrison C, Metzger P. Play. Occupational therapy for children, J Case-Smith. Mosby, St Louis, MO 2001
   Google Scholar
• Velozo C A, Kielhofner G, Lai J S. The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. Am J Occup Ther 1999; 53: 83–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery L M, Russell D J, Raina P S, Walter S D, Rosenbaum P L. Rasch analysis of the Gross Motor Function Measure: Validating the assumptions of the Rasch model to create an interval-level measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 697–705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 1985; 38: 27–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacDermid J C, Stratford P. Applying evidence on outcome measures to hand therapy practice. J Hand Ther 2004; 17: 165–173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trombly C, Scott A. Evaluation of motor control. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction, C Trombly. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 1989
   Google Scholar
• Tiffin J, Asher E. The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Physiol 1948; 32: 234–247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberg E. Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand. J Bone Jt Surg 1958; 40B: 454–476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebsen R H, Taylor N, Trieschmann R B, Trotter M J, Howard L A. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1969; 50: 311–319
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985; 39: 386–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Krashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test. Occup Ther J Res 1985; 5: 24–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollerman C, Ejeskar A. Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. Scand J Plastic Reconstruct Hand Surg 1995; 29: 167–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson-Sollerman C, Sperling L. Grip function of the healthy hand in a standardized hand function test. A study of the Rancho Los Amigos test. Scand J Rehabil Med 1977; 9: 123–129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee-Valkov P M, Aaron D H, Eladoumikdachi F, Thornby J, Netscher D T. Measuring normal hand dexterity values in normal 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children and their relationship with grip and pinch strength. J Hand Ther 2003; 16: 22–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hermansson L M. Structured training of children fitted with myoelectric prostheses. Prosthetics Orthotics Int 1991; 15: 88–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light C M, Chappell P H, Kyberd P J. Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: Normative data, reliability, and validity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 776–783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner L V, James M, Bagley A, Thomhave W A. Ubet you can [abstract] Annual Meeting of Association of children's Prosthetic-Orthotic Clinics. 2005 May 14 – 17, St Pete Beach, Florida, USA, p13. J Bone Jt Surg 2003
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson E R, Scott R N. UNB test of Prosthetics function. Bio-Engeneering Institute, University of New Brunswick, FrederictonNB, Canada 1985
   Google Scholar
• Wright F V, Hubbard S, Jutai J, Naumann S. The Prosthetic Upper Extremity Functional Index: Development and reliability testing of a new functional status questionnaire for children who use upper extremity prostheses. J Hand Ther 2001; 14: 91–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright F V, Hubbard S, Naumann S, Jutai J. Evaluation of the validity of the prosthetic upper extremity functional index for children. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 518–527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumlinde Sundholm L, Eliasson A C. Development of the Assisting Hand Assessment: A Rasch-built measure intended for children with unilateral upper limb impairments. Scand J Occup Ther 2003; 10: 16–26
   Google Scholar
• Kopp B, Kunkel A, Flor H, Platz T, Rose U, Mauritz K H, Gresser K, McCulloch K L, Taub E. The Arm Motor Ability Test: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 615–620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, Villringer K, Villringer A, Taub E, Flor H. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 624–628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A G, Bryze K, Atchison B T. Naturalistic assessment of functional performance in school settings: Reliability and validity of the School AMPS scales. J Outcome Measure 2000; 4: 491–512
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyle R C. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981; 4: 483–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant development. The Psychological Corp, New York 1969
   Google Scholar
• Tsang W P. Hand Function evaluation in pre-school children with and without physical dysfunction. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 1999; 266
   Google Scholar
• Johnson L M, Randall M J, Reddihough D S, Oke L E, Byrt T A, Bach T M. Development of a clinical assessment of quality of movement for unilateral upper-limb function. Dev Med Child Neurol 1994; 36: 965–973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall M, Johnson L M, Reddihough D. The Melbourne Assessment: Test administration manual. Royal Children's Hospital, MelbourneAustralia 1999
   Google Scholar
• Henderson S E, Sugden D A. Movement assessment battery for children: manual. Psychological Corporation, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• Folio M R, Fewell R R. Peabody Developmental motor scales and activity cards. DLM-Teaching Resources, Dallas, TX 1983
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard A R, Ottenbacher K J, Lane S J. Interrater reliability of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales: Fine motor scale. Am J Occup Ther 1994; 48: 976–981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes N A, Deitz J L, Crowe T K. The Peabody Developmental Fine Motor Scale: An interrater reliability study. Am J Occup Ther 1990; 44: 334–340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMatteo C, Law M, Russell D, Pollock N, Rosenbaum P, Walter S. The Reliability and validity of the quality of upper extremity skills test. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 1993; 13: 1–18
   Google Scholar
• Lankveld v W, van ‘t Pad Bosch P, Bakker J, Terwindt S, Franssen M, van Riel P. Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment (SODA). J Hand Ther 1996; 9: 27–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagley A. The Unilateral Below Elbow Test. 58th Annual Meeting of American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine 2004, Sept 29 – Oct 2, Los Angeles, CA, USA. p 33 – 34. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 33–34
   Google Scholar
• Young N L, Williams J I, Yoshida K K, Bombardier C, Wright J G. The context of measuring disability: Does it matter whether capability or performance is measured?. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1097–1101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young N L, Yoshida K K, Williams J I, Bombardier C, Wright J G. The role of children in reporting their physical disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 913–918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pencharz J, Young N L, Owen J L, Wright J G. Comparison of three outcomes instruments in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21: 425–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt S D, Seid M, Varni J W, Setoguchi Y. Toddlers with limb deficiency: Conceptual basis and initial application of a functional status outcome measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 819–824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure 2nd ed. CAOT Publications Ace, Toronto, ON 1994
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure. 3rd ed. CAOT Publications, Toronto, ON 1998
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell-Opzoomer A, McColl M A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian occupational performance measure. 1st ed. CAOT Publications, Toronto, ON 1991
   Google Scholar
• Beaton D E, Katz J N, Fossel A H, Wright J G, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001; 14: 128–146
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis A M, Beaton D E, Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C, Cole D, Hawker G, Katz J N, Makela M, Marx R G, Punnett L, Wright J G. Measuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure. J Hand Ther 1999; 12: 269–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudak P L, Amadio P C, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Indust Med 1996; 29: 602–608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung K C, Pillsbury M S, Walters M R, Hayward R A. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg 1998; 23A: 575–587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Custers J WH. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, the Dutch adaption [thesis]. Department of Pediatric Physical Therapy: Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht 2001; 149
   Google Scholar
• Haley S M, Coster W J, Ludlow L H, Haltiwanger J T, Andrellos P J. Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI). New England Medical Center Hospitals, Boston, MA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Daltroy L H, Liang M H, Fossel A H, Goldberg M J, Pediatric Outcomes Instrument Development Group. The POSNA pediatric musculoskeletal functional health questionnaire: report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. J Pediatr Orthop 1998; 18: 561–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes R J, Sullivan E. The Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America pediatric orthopaedic functional health questionnaire: An analysis of normals. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21: 619–621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo R A, Inui T S. Toward clinical applications of health status measures: Sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes. Health Services Res 1984; 19: 277–289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch K L, Cook E W, Flemming W C, Novack T A, Taub E. A reliable test of upper extremity ADL function (abstract). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A G. The assessment of IADL motor skills: An application of many-faceted Rasch analysis. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 319–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lee J H, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar R C, Lankhorst G J, Bouter L M. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 14–19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar