References
- Makela M, Heliovaara M, Sievers K, Impivaara O, Knekt P, Aromaa A. Prevalence, determinants, and consequences of chronic neck pain in Finland. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 1356–1367
- Hermann K, Reese S. Relationships among selected measures of impairment, functional limitation, and disability in patients with cervical disorders. Phys Ther 2001; 81: 903–914
- Lagattuta F, Falco F. Assessment and treatment of cervical spine disorders. Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Braddom. Saunders, Philadelphia 2000; 762–791
- Clair D, Edmondston S, Allison G. Variability in pain intensity, physical and psychological function in non-acute, non-traumatic neck pain. Physiother Res Int 2004; 9: 43–54
- Jette A M. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 145–149
- World Health Organization. Towards a common language for Functioning, Disability, and Health, 2002;WHO/EIP/GPE/CAS/01.3
- Patrick D, Deyo R. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 1989; 27: S217–S232
- Laupacis A, Wong C, Churchill D. The use of generic and specific quality-of-life measures in hemodialysis patients treated with erythropoietin. The Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group. Control Clin Trials 1991; 12(Suppl. 4)168S–179S
- Kantz M E, Harris W J, Levitsky K, Ware J E, Davies A R. Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement. Med Care 1992; 30(Suppl. 5)MS240–MS252
- Stucki G, Liang M H, Fossel A H, Katz J N. Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48(11)1369–1378
- Pietrobon R, Coeytaux R, Carey T, Richardson W, DeVellis R. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction. Spine 2002; 27: 515–522
- van der Linden W, Hambleton R. Handbook of modern item response theory. Springer, New York 1997
- Riddle D, Stratford P. Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 951–963
- NHANES. 1999 – 2000 Public Data Release File Documentation, Accessed 30 November 2004 at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/NHANES19992000FAQS.htm.
- Grotle M, Brox J, Vollestad N. Functional status and disability questionnaires: What do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine 2005; 30: 130–140
- King J, McGinnis K, Roberts M. Quality of life assessment with the medical outcomes study short form-36 among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery 2003; 52: 113–121
- Jette D, Jette A. Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 930–941
- King J, Roberts M. Validity and reliability of the SF-36 in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 2002; 97(2)180–185
- Hains F, Waalen J, Mior S. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998; 21: 75–80
- Ackelman B, Lindgren U. Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 284–287
- Wheeler A, Goolkasian P, Baird A, Darden B. Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale: Item analysis, face and criterion-repeated validity. Spine 1999; 24: 1290–1299
- Million R, Nilsen K H, Jayson M I, Baker R D. Evaluation of low back pain and assessment of lumbar corsets with and without back supports. Ann Rheum Dis 1981; 40: 449–454
- Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: A study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992; 14: 409–415
- Jordan A, Manniche C, Mosdal C, Hindsberger C. The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale: A study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998; 21: 52–527