Rehabilitation students' attitudes toward persons with disabilities in high- and low-stakes social contexts: A conjoint analysis

References

• Brodwin M G, Orange L M. Attitudes toward disability. Rehabilitation services: An introduction for the human service professional, J D Andrew, C W Faubion. Aspen Professional Services, Osage Beach, MO 2002; 174–197
   Google Scholar
• Cook D. Psychosocial impact of disability. Rehabilitation counseling: Basics and beyond 3rd ed., R M Parker, E M Szymanski. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1998; 303–326
   Google Scholar
• Livneh H, Antonak R F. Psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability. Aspen, Gaithersburg, MD 1997
   Google Scholar
• Siller J. Attitudes toward disability. Contemporary vocational rehabilitation, H Rusalem, D Malikin. New York University Press, New York 1976; 67–79
   Google Scholar
• Smart J. Disability, society, and the individual. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 2002
   Google Scholar
• Chubon R A. An analysis of research dealing with attitudes of professionals toward disability. J Rehab 1982; 48(1)25–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benham P K. Attitudes of occupational therapy personnel toward persons with disabilities. Am J Occupat Ther 1988; 42: 305–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes J, Deyer C A, Hansen R A, Russell J C. Influence of occupational therapy curricula on students' attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Am J Occup Ther 1991; 45(2)156–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman B. Studies of attitudes toward the handicapped: The need for a new direction. Social Problems 1981; 28: 321–337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonak R F, Livneh H. The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities: Methods, psychometric and scales. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL 1988
   Google Scholar
• Paris M J. Attitudes of medical students and health-care professionals toward people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1993; 74: 818–825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garske G G, Thomas K R. The relationship of self-esteem and contact to attitudes of students in rehabilitation counseling toward people with disabilities. Rehab Counsel Bull 1990; 34: 67–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt B, Hunt C S. Attitudes toward people with disabilities: A comparison of undergraduate rehabilitation and business major. Rehab Educ 2000; 14(3)269–283
   Google Scholar
• Chan C CH, Lee T MC, Yuen H K, Chan F. Attitudes towards people with disabilities between Chinese rehabilitation and business students: An implication for practice. Rehab Psychol 2002; 47: 324–338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal D A, Berven N L. Effects of client race on clinical judgment. Rehab Counsel Bull 1999; 42: 243–265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal D. The effects of client race on clinical judgment of practicing vocational rehabilitation counselors. Rehab Counsel Bull 2004; 47(3)131–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohmer D C, Leierer S J. Modeling rehabilitation counselor clinical judgment. Rehab Counsel Bull 2000; 44: 3–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spengler P M, Strohmer D C, Prout H T. Testing the robustness of the diagnostic overshadowing bias. Am J Mental Retardation 1990; 95: 204–214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strohmer D C, Shivy V A. Bias in counselor hypothesis testing: Testing the robustness of counselor confirmatory bias. J Counsel Develop 1994; 73: 191–198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi M, Rosenthal D, Chan F. Effect of race on clinical judgment of African American undergraduate students in rehabilitation. Rehab Counsel Bull 2003; 46: 157–163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grand S A, Bernier J E, Strohmer D C. Attitudes toward disabled persons as functions of social context and specific disability. Rehab Psychol 1982; 27: 165–174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright B. Attitudes and the fundamental negative bias: Conditions and corrections. Attitudes toward people with disabilities, H E Yuker. Springer, New York 1988; 3–21
   Google Scholar
• Dooley D M, Gliner J A. Perception of disability labels: Effect of attitude and stimulus presentation. Rehab Psychol 1989; 34: 259–270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelkin L P. Dimensionality of disability labels. Rehab Psychol 1985; 30: 221–233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abroms K, Kodera T L. Acceptance hierarchy of handicaps: Validation of Kirk's statement, “Special education begins where medicine stops”. J Learning Disab 1979; 12: 24–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan F, Wang M H, Thomas K R, Wong D, Chan C CH, Lee G, Lui K. Conjoint analysis in rehabilitation counseling research. Rehab Educ 2002; 16: 179–195
   Google Scholar
• Livneh H, Antonak R. Indirect methods of attitude measurement: Reply to Linkowski and Yuker. Rehab Educ 1994; 8: 144–148
   Google Scholar
• Wang M H, Thomas K, Chan F, Cheing G. A conjoint analysis of factors influencing American and Taiwanese college students' preferences for people with disabilities. Rehab Psychol 2003; 48: 195–201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Marketing Association. Conjoint analysis: A guide for designing and interpreting conjoint studies. Author, Chicago 1992
   Google Scholar
• Tsang H WH, Chan C CH, Chan F. Conjoint analysis: An alternative approach to studying stigma. Transcult Psychiat 2001; 38(1)136–139
   Google Scholar
• Shamir M, Shamir J. Competing values in public opinion: A conjoint analysis. Political Behavior 1995; 17: 107–133
   Google Scholar
• Tsang H, Chan F, Chan C CH. Attitudes of occupational therapy students toward placement of treatment facilities in the community: A conjoint analysis. Am J Occupat Ther 2004; 58: 426–434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong D W, Chan F, Cardoso E, Lam C S, Miller S. Rehabilitation counseling students' attitudes toward people with disabilities in three social contexts: A conjoint analysis. Rehab Counsel Bull 2004; 47: 194–204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan P W, River L, Lundin R K, Wasowski K U, Campion J, Mathisen J. Stigmatizing attributions about mental illness. J Comm Psychol 2000; 28: 91–102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green P E, Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. J Consumer Res 1978; 5: 103–123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). SPSS Conjoint 8.0. Author, Chicago 1997
   Google Scholar
• Louviere J J. Analyzing decision making: Metric conjoint analysis series-quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1988
   Google Scholar
• Hammond K R, McClelland G H, Mumpower J. Human judgment and decision making. Praeger Publishers, New York 1980
   Google Scholar
• Wilkie W L, Pessemier E A. Issues in marketing's use of multi-attribute attitude models. J Marketing Res 1973; 10: 428–441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilfoyle E M, Gliner J A. Attitudes toward handicapped children: Impact of an educational program. Phys Occupat Ther Pediatrics 1985; 5: 27–41
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb J, Gottlieb B W. Stereotypic attitudes and behavioral intentions toward handicapped children. Am J Mentally Deficient 1977; 82: 65–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson S A, Ronald L. The effect of a physically handicapped interviewer on children's expression of values toward handicap. Rehab Psychol 1977; 24: 211–218
   Google Scholar
• Voeltz L M. Children's attitudes toward the amputee child. Am J Mentally Deficient 1980; 84: 455–464
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwarzer R, Weiner B. Stigma controllability and coping as predictors of emotions and social support. J Soc Personal Relationships 1991; 8: 133–140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner B, Perry R P, Magnusson J. An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. J Personality Soc Psychol 1998; 55: 738–748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siller J, Ferguson L T, Vann D H, Holland B. Studies in reactions to disability. Structure of attitudes toward the physically disabled. New York University, School of Education, New York 1967; 12
   Google Scholar
• See J, Kamnetz B. Person-centered counseling in rehabilitation professions. Counseling theories and techniques for rehabilitation health professionals, F Chan, N Berven, K R Thomas. Springer, New York 2004; 76–97
   Google Scholar
• Thomas K R, Thoreson R, Parker R, Buttler A. Theoretical foundations of the counseling function. Rehabilitation counseling: Basics and beyond 3rd ed., R M Parker, E M Szymanski. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1998; 225–268
   Google Scholar
• Wood W. Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Ann Rev Psychol 2000; 51: 539–570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar