Validation of the Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State (MEAMS) as a cognitive screening test in patients with acquired brain injury in Turkey

References

• Folstein M F, Folstein S E, McHugh P R. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiat Res 1975; 12: 189–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd A G, Wolfe C DA. Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clin Rehab 2003; 17: 158–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwecker M, Levenkrohn S, Fleising Y, Zeiling G, Ohry A, Adunsky A. Mini-Mental State Examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment: Relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2002; 83: 342–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick J PR, Guiloff R J, Stewart A, Blackstock J, Bielawska C, Paul E A. Mini-Mental State Examination in neurological patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1984; 47: 496–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges J R. Cognitive assessment for clinicians. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1994
   Google Scholar
• Feher E P, Mahurin R K, Doody R S, Cooke N, Sims J, Pirozzolo F J. Establishing the limits of the Mini-Mental State. Examination of subtests. Arch Neurol 1992; 49: 87–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding E. Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State. Thames Valley Test Company. 1988
   Google Scholar
• Shiel A, Wilson B A. Performance of stroke patients on the Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State. Clin Rehab 1992; 6: 283–289
   Google Scholar
• Karatas M, Kemiksizoglu A, Sozay S, Cetin N, Bayramoglu M, Kilinc S. Event related potentials in ischemic stroke patients; relationships with functional disability and mental status. 2nd World Congress of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Abstract Book, Prague, 18 – 22 May, 2003; 118
   Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Kűçűkdeveci A A, Kutlay Ş, Elhan A A. Assessing normative cut points through differential item functioning analysis: An example from the adaptation of the Middlesex Elderly Assessment of mental State for use as a cognitive screening test in Turkey. 5th Mediterranean Congress of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Medicine Abstract Book, AntalyaTurkey, September 30 – October 4, 2004; 162
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach L J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D L, Norman G R. Health measurement scales. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995
   Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1960, (reprinted 1980)
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D. Rasch Models for Measurement. SAGE Publications, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, Grimby G, Thonnard J L, Slade A, et al. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model. The PRO-ESOR project. Med Care 2004; 42(1 – 37)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorans N J, Holland P W. DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardisation. Differential item functioning, P W Holland, H Wainer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1993; 36–66
   Google Scholar
• Van Alphen A, Halfens R, Hasman A, Imbos T. Likert or Rasch? Nothing is more applicable than a good theory. J Adv Nurs 1994; 20: 196–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerji M, Smith R M, Dedrick R F. Dimensionality of an early childhood scale using Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. J Outcome Measure 1997; 1: 56–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith R M. Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models. J Appl Measure 2000; 2: 199–218
   Google Scholar
• Fisher W P. Reliability statistics. Rasch Measure Trans 1992; 6: 238
   Google Scholar
• Smith E V. Detecting and evaluation the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Measure 2002; 3: 205–231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kűçűkdeveci A A, Yavuzer G, Elhan A H, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehab 2001; 15: 311–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaziz L, Anderson J J, Meenan R F. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27: S178–S189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre J M. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measure Trans 1994; 7: 28
   Google Scholar
• Bland J M, Altman D G. Multiple significance tests: The Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995; 310: 170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D, Lyne A, Sheridon B, Luo G. RUMM 2010. RUMM Laboratory, Perth 2000
   Google Scholar
• Alderson A L, Novack T A. Reliable serial measurement of cognitive processes in rehabilitation: The Cognitive Log. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2003; 84: 668–672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwecker M, Levenkrohn S, Fleising Y, Zeiling G, Ohry A, Adunsky A. Mini-Mental State Examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment: Relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2002; 83: 342–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond P T, Felsenthal G, Macciocchi S N, Butlet D H, Lally-Cassady D. Effect of cognitive impairment on rehabilitation outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehab 1996; 75: 40–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajek V E, Gagnon S, Ruderman J E. Cognitive and functional assessments of stroke patients: An analysis of their relation. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1997; 78: 1331–1337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhan A H, Kutlay Ş, Kűçűkdeveci A A, Çotuk Ç, Öztűrk G, Tesio L, Tennant A. Psychometric properties of the mini-mental state examination in patients with acquired brain injury in Turkey. J Rehab Med 2005; 37: 306–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar