References
- Pobereskin L H. Incidence and outcome of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a retrospective population based study. J Neurol, Neurosurg Psychiat 2001; 70: 340–343
- van Gijn J, Rinkel G JE. Subarachnoid haemorrhage: Diagnosis, causes and management. Brain 2001; 124(2)249–278
- Ogden J A, Mee E W, Henning M. A prospective study of impairment of cognition and memory and recovery after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 1–15
- Lishman W A. Organic Psychiatry3rd ed. Blackwell, Oxford 1997
- Crosson B A. Subcortical functions in language and memory. Guilford Press, New York 1992
- Powell J, Kitchen N, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Psychosocial outcomes at three and nine months after good neurological recovery from aneurismal subarachnoid haemorrhage: predictors and prognosis. J Neurol, Neurosurg Psychiat 2002; 72: 772–781
- Hop J W, Rinkel G J, Algra A, van Gijn J. Quality of life in patients and partners after aneurismal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Stroke 1998a; 29: 798–804
- Kassell N F, Torner J C, Haley E C, Jr, Jane J A, Adams H P, Kongable G L. The International Co-operative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 1: Overall management results. J Neurosurg 1990b; 73: 18–36
- Whitfield P C, Moss H, O'Hare D, Smielewski P, Pickard J D, Kirkpatrick P J. An audit of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: earlier resuscitation and surgery reduces inpatient stay and deaths from rebleeding. J Neurol, Neurosurg Psychiat 1996; 60: 301–306
- Dombovy M L, Drew-Cates J, Serdans R. Recovery and rehabilitation following subarachnoid haemorrhage Part I: Outcome after inpatient rehabilitation. Brain Injury 1998; 12(6)443–454
- Hunt W E, Hess R M. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968; 28: 14–20
- Wilson B A. Towards a comprehensive model of cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsycholog Rehab 2002; 12: 97–110
- Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Turner-Stokes T, Gatehouse C. The UK FIM + FAM: Development and evaluation. Clin Rehab 1999; 13: 277–288
- Baddeley A, Emslie H, Nimmo-Smith I. Speed and capacity of language processing test. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds 1992
- Wechsler D. The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. The Psychological Corporation, Oxford 1999
- Rey A. L'examen clinique en psychologie. Presses universitaires de France, Paris 1964
- Wilson B A, Cockburn J, Baddeley A D. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds 1985
- James M, Plant G T, Warrington E K. Cortical Vision Screening Test. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds 2001
- Wilson B A, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Behavioural Inattention Test. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds 1987
- Beschin N, Robertson I H. Personal vs. extra-personal neglect: A group study of dissociation using a reliable clinical test. Cortex 1998; 33: 379–389
- Robertson I H, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The Test of Everyday Attention. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds 1994
- Wilson B A, Alderman N, Burgess P W, Emslie H, Evans J J. Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds 1996
- Beck A T, Steer R A, Brown G K. Beck Depression Inventory2nd ed. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio 1996
- Beck A T, Steer R A. Beck Anxiety Inventory. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio 1993
- Robertson I H, Tegner R, Tham K, Lo A, Nimmo-Smith I. Sustained attention training for unilateral neglect: Theoretical and rehabilitation implications. J Clin Experim Neuropsychol 1995; 17: 416–430
- Wilson F C, Manly T, Coyle D, Robertson I H. The effect of contralesional limb activation training and sustained attention training for self-care programmes in unilateral spatial neglect. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2000; 16: 1–4
- Hutter B O, Gilsbach J M, Kreitschmann I. Quality of life and cognitive deficits after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Br J Neurosurg 1995; 9: 465–476
- MacNiven J A, Poz R, Bainbridge K, Gracey F, Wilson B A. Emotional adjustment following cognitive recovery from ‘persistent vegetative state’: Psychological and personal perspectives. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 525–533