Cognitive representations of disability behaviours in people with mobility limitations: Consistency with theoretical constructs

References

• Ware J E, Snow K K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF 36 health survey. Manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, Boston, MA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Patrick D L. Disablement in the community. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1989
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Buchanan W W, Goldsmith C H, Campbell J, Stitt L W. Validation-study of Womac – a health-status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug-therapy in patients with osteo-arthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833–1840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper A, Power M. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psycholog Med 1998; 28: 551–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M. Models of disability. Psychologist 1996; 9: 205–210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. World Health Organization, Geneva 1980
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Bonetti D, Pollard B. Disability as behaviour: Models of measurement and explanation. Psychology at the turn of the millennium, L Backman, C vonHofsten. Psychology Press, Hove 2002; 319–333
   Google Scholar
• Dixon D. Conceptual and measurement models of disability. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, 2006 [thesis] Available from: University of Aberdeen Library, Aberdeen, UK
   Google Scholar
• NHS. 2006, Expert patient programme [internet]. Available from: www.expertpatients.nhs.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Kelly G A. Psychology of personal constructs: A theory of personality. Norton and Company, Inc., New York 1955
   Google Scholar
• Leventhal H, Nerenz D R, Steele D S. Illness representations and coping with health threats. Handbook of psychology and health, A Baum, S E Taylor, J E Singer. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1984; 219–252
   Google Scholar
• Leventhal H, Leventhal E A, Contrada R J. Self-regulation, health, and behavior: A perceptual-cognitive approach. Psychol Health 1998; 13: 717–733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin J, Meltzer H, Elliott D. The prevalence of disability among adults. OPCS surveys of disability in Great Britain. HMSO, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Fransella F, Bannister D. A manual for repertory grid technique1st ed. Academic Press, London 1977
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Human Decision Proc 1991; 50: 179–211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman, New York 1997
   Google Scholar
• Orbell S, Johnston M, Rowley D, Davey P, Espley A. Self-efficacy and goal importance in the prediction of physical disability in people following hospitalization: A prospective study. Br J Health Psychol 2001; 6: 25–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Morrison V, MacWalter R, Partridge C. Perceived control, coping and recovery from disability following stroke. Psychol Health 1999; 14: 181–192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorig K, Chastain R L, Ung E, Shoor S, Holman H R. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthr Rheumat 1989; 32: 37–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewart C K. The role of physical self-efficacy in recovery from heart attack. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action, R Schwarzer. Taylor Francis, London 1992; 287–304
   Google Scholar
• Toshima M T, Kaplan R R, Fries A L. Self-efficacy expectancies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease rehabilitation. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action, R Schwarzer. Taylor & Francis, London 1992; 325–355
   Google Scholar
• Orbell S, Espley A, Johnston M, Rowley D. Health benefits of joint replacement surgery for patients with osteoarthritis: Prospective evaluation using independent assessments in Scotland. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 564–570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveille S G, Fried L, Guralnik J M. Disabling symptoms – what do older women report?. J Gen Inter Med 2002; 17: 766–773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinetti M E, Speechley M, Ginter S F. Risk-factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. New Engl J M 1988; 319: 1701–1707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevitt M C, Cummings S R, Kidd S, Black D. Risk-factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls – a prospective study. J Am Med Assoc 1989; 261: 2663–2668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki B E, Holliday P J, Topper A K. Fear of falling and postural performance in the elderly. J Gerontol 1991; 46: M123–M131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hampson S E, Glasgow R E. Dimensional complexity of older patients' illness representations of arthritis and diabetes. Basic Appl Social Psychol 1996; 18: 45–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard B, Johnston M, Dieppe P. What do osteoarthritis heath outcome instruments measure? Impairment, activity limitation or participation restriction?. J Rheumatol 2006; 33: 757–763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreinhofer K, Stucki G, Ewert T, Huber E, Ebenbichler G, Gutenbrunner C, et al. ICF core sets for osteoarthritis. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 75–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampson S E, Glasgow R E, Zeiss A M. Personal models of osteoarthritis and their relation to self-management activities and quality-of-life. J Behav Med 1994; 17: 143–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham C, Hampson S E. A social cognition approach to health psychology: Philosophical and methodological issues. Psychol Health 1996; 11: 223–241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser J R. The influence of question framing on symptom report and perceived health status. Psychology Health 2000; 15: 13–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioffi D. Making public the private: Possible effects of expressing somatic experience. Psychol Health 1996; 11: 203–222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage C J, Conner M. Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: Predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Social Psych 1999; 29: 72–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage C J, Conner M. The theory of planned behaviour: Assessment of predictive validity and ‘perceived control’. Br J Social Psychol 1999; 38: 35–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes R E, Courneya K S. Self-efficacy, controllability and intention in the theory of planned behavior: Measurement redundancy or causal independence?. Psychol Health 2003; 18: 79–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povey R, Conner M, Sparks P, James R, Shepherd R. Application of the theory of planned behaviour to two dietary behaviours: Roles of perceived control and self-efficacy. Br J Health Psychol 2000; 5: 121–139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks P, Guthrie C A, Shepherd R. The dimensional structure of the perceived behavioral control construct. J Appl Social Psychol 1997; 27: 418–438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Understanding and changing health behaviour: From health beliefs to self-regulation, P Norman, C Abraham, M Conner. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam 2000; 299–343
   Google Scholar