The benefits of theory for clinical practice: Cognitive treatment for chronic low back pain patients as an illustrative example

References

• Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth A L, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ [Sept], 2000; 321: 694–696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte J. Clinical trials in rehabilitation: What are the obstacles?. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82(10 suppl.)s16–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D. Describing rehabilitation interventions. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 811–818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert R J, McPherson K, Dean S. Theory development and a science of rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27(24)1493–1501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettinga A T, Twillert van S, Poels B, Postema K. Distinguishing theories of dysfunction, treatment and care. Reflections on ‘Describing rehabilitation interventions’. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20(369)369–374
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewin K. Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Harper & Row, New York 1951
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin A E. Current (lack of) status of theory in child and adolescent psychotherapy research. J Clin Child Psychol 1999; 28(4)533–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truchon M. Determinants of chronic disability related to low back pain: Towards an integrative biopsychosocial model. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23(17)758–767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulder van M W. The effectiveness of conservative treatment of acute and chronic low back pain. EMGO-Institute, Amsterdam 1999
   Google Scholar
• Kent P, Keating J. Do primary care clinicians think that non-specific low back pain is one condition?. Spine 2004; 29(9)1022–1031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldeman S. Presidential address, North American Spine Society: Failure of the pathology model to predict back pain. Spine 1990; 15(7)718–724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachemson A. Newest knowledge of Low Back Pain; a critical look. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res 1992; 279: 8–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson G. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet August 14, 1999; 354: 581–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe F J, Dunsmore J, Burnett R. Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral approaches to chronic pain: Recent advances and future directions. J Consulting Clin Psychol 1992; 60(4)528–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flor H, Knost B, Birbaumer N. The role of operant conditioning in chronic pain: An experimental investigation. Pain 2002; 95: 111–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. 2001 Volvo award winner clinical studies: Effects of a media campaign on back pain beliefs and its potential influence on management of low back pain in general practice. Spine 2001; 26(23)2535–2542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation. BMJ 2001; 322(23 June)1516–1520
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turk D C, Monarch E S. Biopsychosocial perspective on chronic pain. Psychological approaches to pain management; a practitioner's handbook. 2nd ed, D C Turk, R J Gatchel. The Guilford Press, New York 2002; 3–29
   Google Scholar
• Turk D C. A cognitive-behavioral perspective on treatment of chronic pain patients. Psychological approaches to pain management; a practitioner's handbook. 2nd ed, D C Turk, R J Gatchel. The Guilford Press, New York 2002; 138–158
   Google Scholar
• Turk D C, Sherman J J. Treatment of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Psychological approaches to pain management; a practitioner's handbook. 2nd ed, D C Turk, R J Gatchel. The Guilford Press, New York 2002; 390–416
   Google Scholar
• Vlaeyen J, Morley S. Cognitive-behavioural treatments for chronic pain; what works for whom?. Clin J Pain 2005; 21(1)1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal H, Nerenz D R, Steele D J. Illness representations and coping with health threats. Handbook of psychology and health, A Baum, S E Taylor, J Singer. Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1984; 219–252
   Google Scholar
• Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownlee S, Diefenbach M, Leventhal E A, Patrick-Miller L, Robitaille C. Illness representations: Theoretical foundations. Perceptions of health and illness, K J Petrie, J A Weinman. Harwood Academic, London 1997; 19–45
   Google Scholar
• Ogden J. Illness cognitions. Health psychology, a textbook. 2nd ed. Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia 2000; 36–58
   Google Scholar
• Petrie K J, Cameron L D, Ellis C J, Buick D, Weinman J. Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: An early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med 2002; 64: 580–586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie K J, Weinman J, Sharpe N, Buckley J. Role of patients' view of their illness in predicting return to work and functioning after myocardial infarction: Longitudinal study. BMJ 1996; 312(7040)1191–1194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal H, Halm E, Horowitz C, Leventhal E A, Ozakinci G. Living with chronic illness: A contextualized, self-regulation approach. The Sage Handbook of Health Psychology, S Sutton, A Baum, M Johnston. Saga Publications, London 2004; 197–240
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie K, Horne R, Cameron L, Buick D. The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health 2002; 17(1)1–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinman J, Petrie K, Moss-Morris R, Horne R. The illness perception questionnaire: A new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness. Psychol Health 1996; 11: 431–445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger M S, Orbell S. A meta-analytic review of the common-sense model of illness representations. Psychol Health 2003; 18(2)141–184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith R A, Lipsey M W. The role of theory in rehabilitation assessment, treatment and outcomes. Improving rehabilitation assessment practices: Issues and new direction, R L Glueckauf, L B Sechrest, G R Bond, E C McDonel. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills 1993; 33–58
   Google Scholar
• Chen H-T. Theory-driven evaluations. Sage Publications, London 1990; 1
   Google Scholar
• Lettinga A T, Siemonsma P, Veen van M. Entwinement of theory and practice in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 1999; 85(9)476–490
   Google Scholar
• Beurskens A, Vet de H CW, Koke A, Lindemam E, Heijden van der G J, Regtop W, Knipschild P G. A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. J Manipulat Physiolog Therapeutics 1999; 22(3)144–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beurskens A, Vet de H CW, Koke A. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996; 65(1)71–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinman J, Petrie K J. Illness perceptions: A new paradigm for psychosomatics? (Abstract). J Psychosom Res. 1997; 113–116
   Google Scholar
• Scharf Donovan H, Ward S. A representational approach to patient education. J Nursing Scholarship 2001, third quarter: 211–216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson L. The Socratic Method [in Dutch: De socratische methode]. Boom, Amsterdam 1994; 5
   Google Scholar
• Vincelli F, Choi Y, Molinari E, Wiederhold B, Riva G. Experimental cognitive therapy for the treatment of panic disorders with agoraphobia: Definition of a clinical protocol. Cyber Psychol Behav 2000; 3(3)375–386
   Google Scholar
• Pimm T J, Weinman J. Applying Leventhal's self-regulation model to adaptation and intervention in rheumatic disease. Clin Psychol Psychother 1998; 5: 62–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overholser J C. The Socratic method as a technique in psychotherapy supervision. Prof Psychol: Res Pract 1991; 22(1)68–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron L D. Anxiety, cognition, and responses to health threats. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour, L D Cameron, H Leventhal. Routledge, London 2003; 157–183
   Google Scholar
• Strike K A, Posner G J. A revisionist theory of conceptual change. Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice, R A Duschl, R J Hamilton. State University of New York Press, Albany 1992; 147–176
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer M J. Overview of clinical trials in medical rehabilitation. Impetuses, challenges, and needed future directions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82(10 suppl.)s8–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettinga A, Reynders K, Mulder Th, Mol A. Pitfalls in effectiveness research: A comparative analysis of treatment goals and outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 174–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M V, Stineman M, Velozo C A. Outcome research in medical rehabilitation: Foundations from the past and directions for the future. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcome research, M J Fuhrer. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore 1997; 1–41
   Google Scholar
• Keith R A. The role of treatment theory. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcome research, M J Fuhrer. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore 1997; 257–274
   Google Scholar