Community ambulation: Influences on therapists and clients reasoning and decision making

References

• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health [Web Page]. 22 June, 2001, Accessed 4 Jul 2001 from: http://www.who.int/icidh/prefinaldec2000.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Boschen K A. Interaction of environment with individual characteristics and social participation: Theoretical perspectives and applications in persons with spinal cord injury. Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 2002; 7(3)1–16
   Google Scholar
• J Higgs, Jones, M, Higgs, J, Jones, M. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann. 1995
   Google Scholar
• Jones M, Grimmer K, Edwards I, Higgs J, Trede F. Challenges in applying best evidence to practice. Internet J Allied Health Practice 2006; 4(3)
   Google Scholar
• De Weerdt W, Feys H. Assessment of physiotherapy for patients with stroke. Lancet 2002; 359(9302)182–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhemmer B, Stanghelle J K. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches on physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: A randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 361–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon S. The Bobath concept: A critical review of the theoretical assumptions that guide physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation. Physical Ther Rev 1996; 1: 35–45
   Google Scholar
• Davies P M. Steps to follow. The comprehensive treatment of patients with hemiplegia. 2nd ed. Springer Verlag, Germany 2000
   Google Scholar
• Carr J, Shepherd R. Movement science foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Aspen Publishers, USA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Carr J H, Mungavan S F, Shepherd R B, Dean C M, Nordholm L A. Physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: Bases for Australian physiotherapists' choice of treatment. Physiother Theory Pract 1994; 10: 201–209
   Google Scholar
• Stanko E, Goldie P, Nayler M. Development of a new mobility scale for people living in the community after stroke: Content validity. Aus J Physiother 2001; 47: 201–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity. A review. Am J Prevent Med 2002; 22: 188–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis J F. Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. Am J Prevent Med 2004; 27: 67–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster C, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M. Environmental perceptions and walking in English adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58: 924–928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humpel N, Owen N, Iverson D, Leslie E, Bauman A. Perceived environment attributes, residential location, and walking for particular purposes. Am J Prevent Med 2004; 26: 119–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G G, Harrison-Felix C L, Mellick D C, Brooks C A, Charlifue S B, Gerhart K A. Quantifying environmental factors: A measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1324–1335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G G, Gerhart K A, Cusick C P. Identifying environmental factors that influence the outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 191–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Patla A, Stewart A L, Ferrucci L, Ciol M A, Guralnik J M. Assessing environmentally determined mobility disability: Self-Report versus observed community mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 700–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patla A E, Shumway-Cook A. Dimensions of mobility: Defining the complexity and difficulty associated with community mobility. J Aging Phys Activity 1999; 7: 7–19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman J, Archer A, Jackson H, Lord S, Pearson J, Couts F, Scott O, Bithell C, Kalra L. Is there a link between patients perception of their walking and objective walking performance following stroke?. Age Ageing 1997; 26(Suppl. 1)26
   Google Scholar
• Lockett D, Willis A, Edwards N. Through senior's eyes: An exploratory qualitative study to identify environmental barriers to and facilitators of walking. Can J Nurs Res 2005; 37(3)48–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finlayson M, Kaufert J. Older women's community mobility: A qualitative exploration. Can J Aging 2002; 21: 75–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord S E, McPherson K, McNaughton H K, Rochester L, Weatherall M. Community ambulation after stroke: How important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 234–239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan P A, Gladman J RF, Avery A, Walker M F, Dyas J, Groom L. Randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention to increase outdoor mobility after stroke. BMJ 2004; 329: 1372–1376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Noreau L. Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 559–569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois J A, Keyl P M. Characteristics of older pedestrians who have difficulty crossing the street. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 393–397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 255–264
   Google Scholar
• Ada L, Dean C, Hall J M, Bampton J, Crompton S. A treadmill and overground walking program improves walking in persons residing in the community after stroke: A placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1486–1491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J, Garret M, Gronley J K, Mulroy S J. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995; 26: 982–989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner-Frankiel M B, Vargas S, Brown M B, Krussell L, Schroneberger W. Functional community ambulation: What are your criteria?. Clin Manage 1986; 6: 12–15
   Google Scholar
• Gething L. Sources of double disadvantage for people with disabilities living in remote and rural areas of New South Wales, Australia. Disabil Soc 1997; 12: 513–531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop B J, Coakes S J, D'Rozario P N. Sense of community in rural communities. Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications, A T Fisher, C C Sonn, B J Bishop. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York 2002
   Google Scholar
• Pretty G H, Chipuer H M, Bramston P. Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns. The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to space identity. J Environ Psychol 2003; 23: 273–287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Isaccson A. On scaling methodology and environmental influences in disability assessments: The cumulative structure of personal and instrumental ADL among older adults in a Swedish rural district. Can J Occupat Ther 1997; 64: 240–251
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S. Environmental influences on the cumulative structure of instrumental ADL: An example in osteoporosis patients in a Swedish rural district. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 221–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinett C S, Vondran M A. Functional ambulation velocity and distance requirements in rural and urban communities. A clinical report. Phys Ther 1988; 68: 1371–1373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J J, Sveen J D, Walker J M, Brummel-Smith K. Establishing criteria for community ambulation. Topics Geriatr Rehabil 1987; 3: 71–77
   Google Scholar
• Chin L F, Lim P H. Distance and velocity requirements for functional community mobility in Singapore. Physiother Singapore 2004; 7: 4–6
   Google Scholar
• Kent R, Chandler B J, Barnes M P. An epidemiological survey of the health needs of disabled people in a rural community. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 481–490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen G, Iwarsson S, Stahl A. Theoretical understanding and methodological challenges in accessibility assessments, focusing the environmental component: An example from travel chains in urban public bus transport. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 231–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar