Achieving meaningful measurements of ICF concepts

References

• Kerlinger F. Foundations of al research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1973
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally J C, Bernstein I H. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York 1994
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. WHO, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF, GenevaSwitzerland 2002, Accessed 13 December 2006 from: http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Ewert T, Ustin B, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Set development for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 9–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. Identification of candidate categories of the international classification of functioning disability and health (ICF) for a generic ICF core set based on regression modelling. BMC Med Res Methodol [serial online] 2006; 6(36), Accessed 13 December 2006 from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2288-6-36.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 628–634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 932–938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustun T, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N. Comments from WHO for the Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Special Supplement on ICF core sets. J Rehabil Med 2004; 44: 7–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, Ustun T, Stucki G. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 205–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1225–1237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed G M, Lux J B, Bufka L F, Peterson D B, Threats T T, Trask C, Stark S, Jacobson J W. Operationalizing the international classification of functioning, disability and health in clinical settings. Rehabil Psychol 2005; 50: 122–131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iezzoni L I, Greenberg M. Capturing and classifying functional status information in administrative databases. Health Care Financ Rev 2003; 24: 61–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001; 8
   Google Scholar
• Steiner W, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002; 82(11)1098–1107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson D B. International classification of functioning, disability and health: An introduction for rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabil Psychol 2005; 50: 105–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Grimby G. Foreword: Applying the ICF in medicine. J Rehabil Med 2004; 38: 5–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okochi J, Utsunomiya S, Takahashi T. Health measurement using the ICF: Test-retest reliability study of ICF codes and qualifiers in geriatric care. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 46–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF Checklist: Version 2.1a, clinician form for international classification of functioning, disability and health. 2003, Accessed 13 December 2006 from: http://www3.who.int/icf/checklist/icf-checklist.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grill E, Hermes R, Swoboda W, Uzarewicz C, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF core set for geriatric patients in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 411–417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier-Jarmer M, Grill E, Ewert T, Brtholomeyczik S, Finger M, Mokrusch T, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF core set for patients with neurological conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 389–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldt C, Brach M, Grill E, Berthou A, Meister K, Scheuringer M, Stucki G. The ICF categories identified in nursing interventions administered to neurological patients with post-acute rehabilitation needs. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 431–436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley S M, Andres P L, Coster W J, Kosinski M, Ni P S, Jette A. Short-form activity measure for post-acute care (AM-PAC). Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 649–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley S M, Coster W J, Andres P L, et al. Activity outcome measurement for post-acute care. Med Care 2004; 42: I-49–I-61
   Google Scholar
• Jette A, Haley S. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcome assessment. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37(6)339–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandek B, Sinclair J, Jette A, Ware J. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post Acute Care. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 85(9)1–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jette A, Tao W, Norweg A, Haley S. Interpreting rehabilitation outcome measurements. J Rehabil Med 2007, 39(8):585 – 590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley S M, Fragala-Pinkham M A. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 735–743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyrwich K W. Minimal important difference thresholds and the standard error of measurement: Is there a connection?. J Biopharm Stat 2004; 14(1)97–110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jette D U, Warren R L, Wirtalla C. Validity of functional independence staging in patients receiving rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1095–1101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman M G, Ross R N, Fiedler R, Granger C V, Maislin G. Functional independence staging: conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 29–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette A M, Keysor J J, Coster W J, Ni P S, Haley S M. Beyond function: Predicting participation outcomes in a rehabilitation cohort. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86(11)2087–2094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis D M, Mitzel H C, Green D R, Patz R J. The bookmark standard setting procedure. McGraw-Hill, Monterey, CA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Tao W, Haley S, Coster W, Ni P, Jette A. An exploratory analysis of functional staging using an item response theory approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, In press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar