Development of a questionnaire assessing work-related stress in women – identifying individuals who risk being put on sick leave

References

• Lidwall U, Marklund S, Skogman Thoursie P. Sickness absence in Sweden. Worklife and health in Sweden 2004, R L Gustafsson. National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm 2004; 183–204
   Google Scholar
• Post M, Krol B, Groothoff J W. Work-related determinants of return to work of employees on long-term sickness absence. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27(9)481–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingard E, Lindberg P, Josephson M, Voss M, Heijbel B, Alfredsson L, Stark S, Nygren A. Long-term sick-listing among women in the public sector and its associations with age, social situation, lifestyle, and work factors: A three-year follow-up study. Scand J Public Health 2005; 33(5)370–375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss M, Floderus B, Diderichsen F. Physical, psychosocial, and organisational factors relative to sickness absence: A study based on Sweden Post. Occup Environ Med 2001; 58(3)178–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansfeld S A, Fuhrer R, Shipley M J, Marmot M G. Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: Prospective results from the Whitehall II Study. Occup Environ Med 1999; 56(5)302–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostergren P O, Hanson B S, Balogh I, Ektor-Andersen J, Isacsson A, Orbaek P, Winkel J, Isacsson S O. Incidence of shoulder and neck pain in a working population: Effect modification between mechanical and psychosocial exposures at work? Results from a one-year follow-up of the Malmo shoulder and neck study cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005; 59(9)721–728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Pentti J, Theorell T. Effect of change in the psychosocial work environment on sickness absence: A seven-year follow-up of initially healthy employees. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000; 54(7)484–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pransky G, Gatchel R, Linton S J, Loisel P. Improving return to work research. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15(4)453–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson G, Barlow L, Karlsson A, Rosen M, Stefansson C G, Theorell T, Tull P, Aberg A. Major health problems. Health in Sweden: The National Public Health Report 2001. Scand J Public Health Suppl 2001; 58: 37–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palme J, Bergmark A, Backman O, Estrada F, Fritzell J, Lundberg O, Sjoberg O, Sommestad L, Szebehely M. A welfare balance sheet for the 1990s. Final report of the Swedish Welfare Commission. Scand J Public Health Suppl 2003; 60: 7–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lidwall U, Marklund S. What is healthy work for women and men? A case-control study of gender- and sector-specific effects of psycho-social working conditions on long-term sickness absence. Work 2006; 27(2)153–163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krantz G, Ostergren P O. Do common symptoms in women predict long spells of sickness absence? A prospective community-based study on Swedish women 40 to 50 years of age. Scand J Public Health 2002; 30(3)176–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östlin P. Gender inequalities in health: The significance of work. Gender and social inequities in health, S P Wamala, J Lynch. Studentlitteratur, Lund 2002; 43–65
   Google Scholar
• McDowell I. Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York 2006; 10–54
   Google Scholar
• Streiner D L, Norman G R. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use2nd ed. Oxford Medical Publications, New York 1994
   Google Scholar
• Golden C, Sawicki R, Franzen M. Test construction. Handbook of psychological assessment, G Goldstein, M Hersen. Pergamont Press Inc., New York 1990; 21–40
   Google Scholar
• Switzer G E, Wisniewski S R, Belle S H, Dew M A, Schultz R. Selecting, developing, and evaluating research instruments. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999; 34(8)399–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller T D, Edwards J N, Vorakitphokatorn S, Sermsri S. Successful focus groups. Advancing the state of the art, D L Morgan. Sage Publications, Newbury Park 1993; 89–104
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren K, Dahlin Ivanoff S. Women on sickness absence – views of possibilities and obstacles for returning to work. A focus group study. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26(4)213–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preckel D, von Kanel R, Kudielka B M, Fischer J E. Overcommitment to work is associated with vital exhaustion. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2005; 78(2)117–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedhammer I, Chastang J F, David S, Barouhiel L, Barrandon G. Psychosocial work environment and mental health: Job-strain and effort-reward imbalance models in a context of major organizational changes. Int J Occup Environ Health 2006; 12(2)111–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joksimovic L, Starke D, v d Knesebeck O, Siegrist J. Perceived work stress, overcommitment, and self-reported musculoskeletal pain: A cross-sectional investigation. Int J Behav Med 2002; 9(2)122–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton S J, Gross D, Schultz I Z, Main C, Cote P, Pransky G, Johnson W. Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: Research issues and directions for future research. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15(4)459–474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin Ivanoff S D, Hultberg J. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scand J Occup Ther 2006; 13(2)125–132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahlin Ivanoff S, Sonn U, Svensson E. Development of an ADL instrument targeting elderly persons with age-related macular degeneration. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23(2)69–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York 1994
   Google Scholar
• Svensson E. Ordinal invariant measures for individual and group changes in ordered categorical data. Stat Med 1998; 17(24)2923–2936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson E, Holm S. Separation of systematic and random differences in ordinal rating scales. Stat Med 1994; 13(23 – 24)2437–2453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart D, Shamdasani P, Rook D. Focus groups: Theory and practice. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2006
   Google Scholar
• Piirainen H, Rasanen K, Kivimaki M. Organizational climate, perceived work-related symptoms and sickness absence: A population-based survey. J Occup Environ Med 2003; 45(2)175–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallsten L, Josephson M, Torgén M. Performance-based self-esteem. A driving force in burnout processes and its assessments. National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm 2005
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1996; 1(1)27–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altman D G. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• Bunketorp L, Carlsson J, Kowalski J, Stener-Victorin E. Evaluating the reliability of multi-item scales: A non-parametric approach to the ordered categorical structure of data collected with the Swedish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the Self-Efficacy Scale. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37(5)330–334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson E. Concordance between ratings using different scales for the same variable. Stat Med 2000; 19(24)3483–3496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson E. Comparison of the quality of assessments using continuous and discrete ordinal rating scales. Biometrical J 2000; 42(4)417–434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar