Facilitators and barriers of stroke survivors in the early post-stroke phase

References

• Rittman M, Faircloth C, Boylstein C, Gubrium J, Williams C, Van Puymbroeck M, et al. The experience of time in the transition from hospital to home following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41: 259–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott C, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1566–1575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Enabling America: assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. National Academic Press, Washington, DC 1997
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P. Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process. Quebec contributions relating to the ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 145–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Noreau L. Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 559–569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosman-Hedström G, Claesson L, Blomstrand C. Assistive devices in elderly people after stroke: a longitudinal, randomized study – the Göteborg 70 + stroke study. Scand J Occup Ther 2002; 9: 109–118
   Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Bragoni M, Coiro P, de Angelis D, Fusco F, Morelli D, et al. Quantification of the probability of reaching mobility independence at discharge from a rehabilitation hospital in non-walking early ischemic stroke patients: a multivariate study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 26: 16–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass T, Matchar D, Belyea M, Feussner J. Impact of social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke 1993; 24: 64–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsouna-Hadjis E, Vemmos K, Zakopoulos N, Stamatelopoulos S. First-stroke recovery process: the role of family social support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 881–887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001, 3: CD000197
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Harrison-Felix C, Mellick D, Brooks C, Charlifue S, Gerhart K. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1324–1335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray D B, Hollingsworth H H, Stark S, Morgan K A. A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30: 434–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, et al. ICF Core Sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med 2004, Suppl. 44: 135–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert T, Grill E, Bartholomeyczik S, Finger M, Mokrusch T, Kostanjsek N, et al. ICF core set for patients with neurological conditions in the acute hospital. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 367–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier-Jamer M, Grill E, Ewert T, Bartholomeyczik S, Finger M, Mokrusch T, et al. ICF core set for patients with neurological conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 389–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen T. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 406–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 2348–2353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Stroke – 1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO task force on stroke and other cerebrovascular disorders. Stroke 1989; 20: 1407–1431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICF Research Branch of WHO CC F IC (DIMDI). Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilian University. ICF Core Sets multicenter international validation study. Ludwig-Maximilian University. Germany, Available from http://wwwicf-research-branchorg/research/validationstudyhtm. 2006
   Google Scholar
• Lai S M, Duncan P W. Stroke recovery profile and the modified Rankin assessment. Neuroepidemiology 2001; 20: 26–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Hareendran A, Hendry A, Potter J, Bone I, Muir K. Reliability of the modified Rankin scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview. Stroke 2005; 36: 777–781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman P, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 1876–1882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med 2001; 33: 337–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarti I M, Laha R G, Roy J. Handbook of methods of applied statistics. Wiley, New York 1967; 392–394
   Google Scholar
• Kjellström T, Norrving B, Shatchkute A. Helsinborg declaration 2006 on European stroke strategies. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23: 229–241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nationella riktlinjer för strokesjukvård. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm 2006, htp://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Amnesord/halso_sjuk/riktlinjer/stroke
   Google Scholar
• Han C, Yajima Y, Lee E, Nakajima K, Meguro M, Kohzuki M. Validity and utility of the Craig Hospital inventory of environmental factors for Korean community – dwelling elderly with or without stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med 2005; 206: 41–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton G, Sach T, Doherty M, Avery A, Jenkinson C, Muir K. An assessment of the discriminative ability of the EQ-5Dindex, SF-6D, and EQ VAS, using sociodemographic factors and clinical conditions. Eur J Health Econ 2008; 9: 237–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darlington A, Dippel D, Ribbers G, van Balen R, Passchier J, Busschbach J. Coping strategies as determinants of quality of life in stroke patients: a longitudinal study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23: 401–407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubetkin E, Jia H, Franks P, Gold M. Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 2187–2196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach N, Mayo N, Robichaud-Ekstrand S, Hanley J, Richards C, Wood-Dauphinee S. Balance self-efficacy and its relevance to physical function and perceived health status after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 364–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden S, Hopman W, Bagg S, Verner J, O'Callaghan C. Functional status and health-related quality of life during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 6: 831–838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönning O, Stavem K. Determinants of change in quality of life from 1 to 6 months following acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25: 67–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar