A review of participation instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

References

• World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. A manual of classification relating to consequences of diseases. World Health Organization, Geneva 1980
   Google Scholar
• Badley E M. The genesis of handicap: definition, models of disablement, and role of external factors. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 53–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray D B, Hendershot G E. The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(12 Suppl 2)S10–S14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimby G, Smedby B. ICF approved as the successor of ICIDH. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 193–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G G, Charlifue S W, Gerhart K A, Overholser J D, Richardson G N. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 519–526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood R H, Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care 1994; 3: 11–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Post M, Asano M. Participation after spinal cord injury: the evolution of conceptualization and measurement. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005; 29: 147–156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr A J, Thompson P W. Towards a measure of patient-perceived handicap in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1994; 33: 378–382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for?. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25(11–12)596–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, Brandsma J W, de Groot I J, van den Bos G A, de Haan R J, de Jong B A. Handicap questionnaires: what do they assess?. Disabil Rehabil 1999; 21: 97–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning and Disability Beta-2 Draft Full Version. World Health Organization, Geneva 1999
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002; 11: 193–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton M J, Jones D R. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: i–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pallant J F, Misajon R, Bennett E, Manderson L. Measuring the impact and distress of health problems from the individual's perspective: development of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford P. Reliability: consistency or differentiating among subjects?. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 299–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers P M, Machin D. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation1st ed. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester 2000
   Google Scholar
• Terwee C B, Dekker F W, Wiersinga W M, Prummel M F, Bossuyt P M. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 349–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckerman H, Roebroeck M E, Lankhorst G J, Becher J G, Bezemer P D, Verbeek A L. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 571–578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick S. Validty of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons' responses and performance as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol 1995; 50: 741–749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D L, Norman G R. “Precision” and “accuracy”: two terms that are neither. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 327–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D L, Norman G R. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for behavioural sciences. Academic Press, New York 1977
   Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan R J, van den Bos G A, de Jong B A, de Groot I J. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 411–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan R J, de Jong B A, van den Bos G A, de Groot I J. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 210–216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, Beelen A, van den Bos G A, de Jong B A, de Groot I J, de Haan R J. Responsiveness of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1524–1529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Hooper H, Croft P R. The Keele assessment of participation: a new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1889–1899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostir G V, Granger C V, Black T, Roberts P, Burgos L, Martinkewiz P, Ottenbacher K J. Preliminary results for the PAR-PRO: a measure of home and community participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1043–1051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandek B, Sinclair S J, Jette A M, Ware J E, Jr. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 86: 57–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Dijkers M P, Gordon W A, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 459–481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Brakel W H, Anderson A M, Mutatkar R K, Bakirtzief Z, Nicholls P G, Raju M S, Das-Pattanayak R K. The participation scale: Measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 193–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray D B, Hollingsworth H H, Stark S L, Morgan K A. PARTS/M: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 189–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom M, Lundin-Olsson L. Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating perceived participation. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 833–845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, WHODAS II. Electronic Citation. November, 2001. Available at http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas (Accessed March 10, 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Haley S M, Gandek B, Siebens H, Black-Schaffer R M, Sinclair S J, Tao W, Coster W J, Ni P, Jette A M. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. II. Participation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 275–283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwastiak L A, Von Korff M. Disability in depression and back pain: evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 507–514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez L M, Canino G, Negron G, Shrout P E, Matias-Carrelo L E, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Hoppe S. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of two mental health outcome measures: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II and Lehman's Quality Of Life Interview. Ment Health Serv Res 2005; 7: 145–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chisolm T H, Abrams H B, McArdle R, Wilson R H, Doyle P J. The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss. Trends Amplif 2005; 9: 111–126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Posl M, Cieza A, Stucki G. Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 1521–1531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward C D, White B, Mehta R, George S. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 793–803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, Guglielmi V, Picco D. Rasch psychometric validation of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire in people with Parkinson's disease. Eura Medicophys 2007; 43: 451–461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kersten P, Cardol M, George S, Ward C, Sibley A, White B. Validity of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: a comparison between two countries. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1502–1509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund M L, Fisher A G, Lexell J, Bernspang B. Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 156–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misajon R, Pallant J F, Manderson L, Chirawatkul S. Measuring the impact of health problems among adults with limited mobility in Thailand: further validation of the perceived impact of problem profile. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehm J, Ustun B, Saxena S, Nelson C B, Chatterji S, Ivis F, Adlaf E. On the development and psychometric testing of the WHO screening instrument to assess disablement in the general population. Int J Methods in Psychiatr Res 1990; 8: 110–122
   Google Scholar
• Middelkamp W, Moulaert V R, Verbunt J A, van Heugten C M, Bakx W G, Wade D T. Life after survival: long-term daily life functioning and quality of life of patients with hypoxic brain injury as a result of a cardiac arrest. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 425–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmens J, van Engelen I SM, Post M W, Beurskens A J, Wolters P M, de Witte L P. Reproducibility and validity of the Dutch Life Habits Questionnaire (LIFE-H 3.0) in older adults. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 853–862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Croft P. The prevalence of person-perceived participation restriction in community-dwelling older adults. Qual Life Res 2006; 15: 1471–1479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Croft P. Factors associated with participation restriction in community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and over. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 1147–1156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette A M, Keysor J, Coster W, Ni P, Haley S. Beyond function: predicting participation in a rehabilitation cohort. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 2087–2094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keysor J J, Jette A M, Coster W, Bettger J P, Haley S M. Association of environmental factors with levels of home and community participation in an adult rehabilitation cohort. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1566–1575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor J B, Ashman T, Gordon W, Ginsberg A, Engmann C, Egan M, Spielman L, Dijkers M, Flanagan S. Fatigue after traumatic brain injury and its impact on participation and quality of life. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2008; 23: 41–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schopp L, Clark M J, Hagglund K J, Sherman A K, Stout B J, Gray D B, Boninger M L. Life activities among individuals with spinal cord injury living in the community: perceived choice and perceived barriers. Rehabil Psychol 2007; 52: 82–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibbin C, Patterson T L, Jeste D V. Assessing disability in older patients with schizophrenia: results from the WHODAS-II. J Nerv Ment Dis 2004; 192: 405–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, Mulvany F. Levels of ability and functioning: using the WHODAS II in an Irish context. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 506–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Adair C E, Patten S B. Mental health and related disability among workers: a population-based study. Am J Ind Med 2006; 49: 514–522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyszel A, Malyszczak K, Pyszel K, Andrzejak R, Szuba A. Disability, psychological distress and quality of life in breast cancer survivors with arm lymphedema. Lymphology 2006; 39: 185–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertugrul A, Ulug B. The influence of neurocognitive deficits and symptoms on disability in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002; 105: 196–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton J, de Roquefeuil G, Benjamins A, Boulenger J P, Mann A. Psychiatric morbidity, disability and service use amongst primary care attenders in France. Eur Psychiatry 2004; 19: 164–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson M, Steele R, Taillefer S, Baron M. Quality of life in systemic sclerosis: psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59: 270–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J M, Stewart R, Glozier N, Prince M, Kim S W, Yang S J, Shin I S, Yoon J S. Physical health, depression and cognitive function as correlates of disability in an older Korean population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005; 20: 160–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soberg H L, Bautz-Holter E, Roise O, Finset A. Long-term multidimensional functional consequences of severe multiple injuries two years after trauma: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. J Trauma 2007; 62: 461–470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donmez L, Gokkoca Z, Dedeoglu N. Disability and its effects on quality of life among older people living in Antalya city center, Turkey. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2005; 40: 213–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson M, Thombs B D, Steele R, Watterson R, Taillefer S, Baron M. Clinical correlates of quality of life in systemic sclerosis measured with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59: 279–284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Korff M, Katon W, Lin E H, Simon G, Ludman E, Oliver M, Ciechanowski P, Rutter C, Bush T. Potentially modifiable factors associated with disability among people with diabetes. Psychosom Med 2005; 67: 233–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tubergen A, Landewe R, Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Spoorenberg A, van der Heijde D, van der Tempel H, van der Linden S. Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 140–145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perini S J, Slade T, Andrews G. Generic effectiveness measures: sensitivity to symptom change in anxiety disorders. J Affect Disord 2006; 90(2–3)123–130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle R, Chisolm T H, Abrams H B, Wilson R H, Doyle P J. The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends Amplif 2005; 9: 127–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 212–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M P, Whiteneck G, El Jaroudi R. Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(12 Suppl 2)S63–S80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Comments on van Brakel et al.'s participation scale. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 1360–1362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer A R, Branholm I, Fugl-Meyer K S. Happiness and domain-specific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clin Rehabil 1991; 5: 25–33
   Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer A R, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer K S. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 239–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Nissim E N, Wood K, Hwang K, Tulsky D. Objective and subjective handicap following spinal cord injury: inter-relationships and predictors. J Spinal Cord Med 2002; 25: 11–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Croft P. Factors associated with restricted mobility outside the home in community-dwelling adults ages fifty years and older with knee pain: an example of use of the International Classification of Functioning to investigate participation restriction. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 1381–1389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D L. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient α does and doesn't matter. J Pers Assess 2003; 80: 217–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi S R, Heinemann A W, Whiteneck G G. Participation following traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for research. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31: 145–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1225–1237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland M E. A brief guide to the selection of quality of life instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dekker J, Dallmeijer A J, Lankhorst G J. Clinimetrics in rehabilitation medicine: current issues in developing and applying measurement instruments. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 193–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G. Conceptual models of disability: past, present, and future. Workshop on disability in America: a new look, M J Field, A M Jette, L Martin. National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2006; 50–66
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone K D. Participation as an outcome of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 494–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Jong B A, van den Bos G A, Beelem A, de Groot I J, de Haan R J. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 27–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdmann P G, Teunissen L L, van Genderen F R, Notermans N C, Lindeman E, Helders P J, van Meeteren N L. Functioning of patients with chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP). J Neurol 2007; 254: 1204–1211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Genderen F R, van Meeteren N L, Heijnen L, van den Berg H M, Helders P J. The use of a disability model in haemophilia research. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 472–480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Genderen F R, Westers P, Heijnen L, de Kleijn P, van Meeteren N L, Helders P J, van Meeteren N L. Measuring patients' perceptions on their functional abilities: validation of the Haemophilia activities list. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 36–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynia K, Middel B, de Ruiter H, van Dijk J P, de Keyser J H, Reijneveld S A. Stability and relative validity of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Profile (MSIP). Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30(14)1027–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund M L, Nordlund A, Bernspang B, Lexell J. Perceived participation and problems in participation are determinants of life satisfaction in people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1417–1422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund M L, Nordlund A, Nygard L, Lexell J, Bernspang B. Perceptions of participation and predictors of perceived problems with participation in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 3–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazirinejad R, Lilley J M, Ward C D. The ‘Impact on participation and autonomy’: acceptability of the English version in a multiple sclerosis outpatient setting. Mult Scler 2003; 9: 612–615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misajon R, Manderson L, Pallant J F, Omar Z, Bennett E, Rahim R B. Impact, distress and HRQoL among Malaysian men and women with a mobility impairment. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross H, Choudhary R. STEP: an intervention to address the issue of stigma related to leprosy in Southern Nepal. Lepr Rev 2005; 76: 316–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross H, Choudhury R. Self-care: a catalyst for community development. Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J 2005; 16: 100–114
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls P G, Bakirtzief Z, Van Brakel W H, Das-Pattanaya R K, Raju M S, Norman G, Mutatkar R K. Risk factors for participation restriction in leprosy and development of a screening tool to identify individuals at risk. Lepr Rev 2005; 76: 305–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deconinck H. The health condition of spinal cord injuries in two Afghan towns. Spinal Cord 2003; 41: 303–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra P K, Couper J W, Herrman H. The assessment of patients with long-term psychotic disorders: application of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2004; 38: 753–759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posl M. Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO DAS II) – German Version [dissertation]. Ludwig Maximilian University. 2004; 1–62
   Google Scholar
• Soberg H L, Finset A, Bautz-Holter E, Sandvik L, Roise O. Return to work after severe multiple injuries: a multidimensional approach on status 1 and 2 years post-injury. J Trauma 2007; 62: 471–481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson I, Tornquist K, Ahlstrom G. The effect of an outdoor powered wheelchair on activity and participation in users with stroke. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2006; 1: 235–243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulberg H C, Lee P W, Bruce M L, Raue P J, Lefever J J, Williams J W, Jr, Dietrich A J, Nutting P A. Suicidal ideation and risk levels among primary care patients with uncomplicated depression. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 523–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertugrul A, Ulug B. Perception of stigma among patients with schizophrenia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004; 39: 73–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar