2,813
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

Selecting relevant and feasible measurement instruments for the revised Dutch clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients after stroke

, , , , &
Pages 1449-1457 | Received 19 Nov 2015, Accepted 28 May 2016, Published online: 03 Jul 2016

References

  • Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–1702.
  • Bland MD, Sturmoski A, Whitson M, et al. Clinician adherence to a standardized assessment battery across settings and disciplines in a poststroke rehabilitation population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1048–1053.e1.
  • Panzer RJ, Gitomer RS, Greene WH, et al. Increasing demands for quality measurement. JAMA. 2013;310:1971–1980.
  • Swinkels RA, van Peppen RP, Wittink H, et al. Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in The Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:106.
  • Duncan EA, Murray J. The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:96.
  • Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, et al. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009;89:125–135.
  • Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within europe. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:273–278.
  • Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004;180:S57–S60.
  • Stevens JG, Beurskens AJ. Implementation of measurement instruments in physical therapist practice: development of a tailored strategy. Phys Ther. 2010;90:953–961.
  • Van Peppen RP, Maissan FJ, Van Genderen FR, et al. Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: a survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13:255–270.
  • Otterman NM, van der Wees PJ, Bernhardt J, et al. Physical therapists' guideline adherence on early mobilization and intensity of practice at dutch acute stroke units: a country-wide survey. Stroke 2012;43:2395–2401.
  • Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230.
  • Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C, et al. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother. 2002;48:43–49.
  • van Peppen RP, Hendriks HJ, van Meeteren NL, et al. The development of a clinical practice stroke guideline for physiotherapists in The Netherlands: a systematic review of available evidence. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:767–783.
  • Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87987.
  • Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American physical therapy association neurology section task force. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1383–1396.
  • Lang CE, Bland MD, Connor LT, et al. The brain recovery core: building a system of organized stroke rehabilitation and outcomes assessment across the continuum of care. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011;35:194–201.
  • Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:315–340.
  • Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF body functions. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:191–207.
  • Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:507–528.
  • van der Wees PJ, Jamtvedt G, Rebbeck T, et al. Multifaceted strategies may increase implementation of physiotherapy clinical guidelines: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54:233–241.
  • Veerbeek JM. KNGF guideline stroke. [Internet]; [cited 2014 Sept 2]. Available from: http://www.fysionet-evidencebased.nl/images/pdfs/guidelines_in_english/stroke_practice_guidelines_2014.pdf
  • Grol R, Wensing M. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice. London: Elsevier; 2005.
  • Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge translation: what it is and what it isn't knowledge. In: Translation in health care. Moving from evidence to practice. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 3–13.
  • Dobbins M, Robeson P, Ciliska D, et al. A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies. Implement Sci. 2009;4:23. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-23.
  • Nationalqualityforum I. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in performance measurement. Washington (DC): National Quality Forum; 2013.
  • Russell DJ, Rivard LM, Walter SD, et al. Using knowledge brokers to facilitate the uptake of pediatric measurement tools into clinical practice: a before-after intervention study. Implement Sci. 2010;5:92. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-92.
  • Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, et al. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:527–530.
  • Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, et al. ICF core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2004;44:135–141.
  • Schepers VP, Ketelaar M, van de Port IG, et al. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:221–230.
  • Meijer R, van Limbeek J, de Haan R. Development of the stroke-unit discharge guideline: choice of assessment instruments for prediction in the subacute phase post-stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 2006;29:1–8.
  • Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, et al. Predictive value of the NIHSS for ADL outcome after ischemic hemispheric stroke: does timing of early assessment matter? J Neurol Sci. 2010;294:57–61.
  • Abolhasani H, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, et al. Comparing the validity of the modified modified ashworth scale (MMAS) and the modified tardieu scale (MTS) in the assessment of wrist flexor spasticity in patients with stroke: protocol for a neurophysiological study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001394.
  • Platz T, Eickhof C, Nuyens G, et al. Clinical scales for the assessment of spasticity, associated phenomena, and function: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:7–18.
  • Bongers BC, DE Vries SI, Helders PJ, et al. The steep ramp test in healthy children and adolescents: reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:366–371.
  • Francisco GE, McGuire JR. Poststroke spasticity management. Stroke. 2012;43:3132–3136.
  • Kerber KA, Brown DL, Skolarus LE, et al. Validation of the 12-item stroke-specific quality of life scale in a biethnic stroke population. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22:1270–1272.
  • Maas MJ, van Dulmen SA, Sagasser MH, et al. Critical features of peer assessment of clinical performance to enhance adherence to a low back pain guideline for physical therapists: a mixed methods design. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:203. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0484-1.
  • Peters M, Crocker H, Dummett S, et al. Change in health status in long-term conditions over a one year period: a cohort survey using patient-reported outcome measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0123-2.
  • Bernhardt J, Borschmann K, Boyd L, et al. Moving rehabilitation research forward: developing consensus statements for rehabilitation and recovery research. Int J Stroke. 2016;11:454–458.