The rehabilitation research matrix: producing knowledge at micro, meso, and macro levels

References

• Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Dean SG. Theory development and a science of rehabilitation: authors’ response to commentaries. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1517–1519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimby G, Melvin J, Stucki G. Foreword. Special issue. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:277–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie R. Demystifying disability: a review of the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Sociol Health Illn. 2004;26:287–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte J. A grand unified theory of rehabilitation (we wish!). The 57th John Stanley Coulter memorial lecture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:203–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt J, Stucki G. Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields revisited: reply to the letters from Jensen Kartin and Graham Cameron. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:204–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenek MJ, Skarakis-Doyle E, Spaulding SJ, et al. Enhancing the conceptual clarity and utility of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: the potential of a new graphic representation. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1015–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tøssebro J. Understanding disability: introduction to the special issues of SJDR”. Scand J Disabil Res. 2004;6:3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley D. Disability Studies. An interdisciplinary introduction. London: Sage; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Health Services Research – Europe [Internet]. Health services research: helping tackle Europe’s health care challenges. Draft policy brief. Page 6. [cited 2014 Apr 22]; Available from: http://www.nivel.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden/HSR-Europe–2010–Health_services_research–Helping_tackle_Europe's_health_care_challenges–Draft_Policy_Brief.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T. Chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. BMJ. 2009;338:629–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutenbrunner C, Bichenbach J, Kiekens C, et al. ISPRM discussion paper: proposing dimensions for an international classification system for service organization in health-related rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:809–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D. Foreword. In: Siegert R, Levack W, editors. Rehabilitation goal setting: theory, practice and evidence. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. p. vii–vix.
   Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Celio M. Developing human functioning and rehabilitation research part II: Interdisciplinary university centers and national and regional collaboration networks. J Rehabil Med. 2015;39:334–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins R. Theoretical sociology. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Feiring M. Experts as agents in rehabilitation policy in Norway. In: Hellberg I, Saks M, Benoit C, editors. Professional identities in transition. Södertälje: Almqvist & Wiksell International; 1999. p. 359–374.
   Google Scholar
• Feiring M, Solvang PK. Rehabilitering – et grensefelt mellom medisin og samfunn <Rehabilitation – a boundary field between medicine and society>. Praktiske Grunde. 2013;7:73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, et al. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1173–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt JD. ICF, theories, paradigms and scientific revolution. Re: towards a unifying theory of rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:271–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Frank A. The wounded storyteller. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ruoranen K, Post M, Juvalta S, et al. Participation and integration from the perspective of persons with spinal cord injury from five European countries. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:216–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post M, Brinkhof M, von Elm E, et al. SwiSCI study group. Design of the Swiss spinal cord injury cohort atudy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90:S5–S16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein S, Dolan LA, Wright JG, et al. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1512–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDermid J, Law M. Evaluating the evidence. In: Law M, MacDermid J, editors. Evidence-based rehabilitation: a guide to practice. 3rd edition. SLACK Inc.: Thorofare; 2013. p. 129–156.
   Google Scholar
• Husson EC, Ribbers GM, Willemse-van Son AH, et al. Prognosis of six-month functioning after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:425–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack W, Taylor K, Siegert R, et al. Is goal planning in rehabilitation effective? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:739–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser I. On becoming disabled and articulating alternatives: the multiple modes of ordering disability and their interferences. Cult Stud. 2005;19:667–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sixsmith J, Callender M, Hobbs G, et al. Implementing the national service framework for long-term (neurological) conditions: service user and service provider experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:563–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemonsma P, Dopp C, Alpay L, et al. Determinants influencing the implementation of home-based stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;24:2019–2030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosebach K. Commercializing German hospital care? Effects of new public management and managed care under neoliberal conditions. German Policy Stud. 2009;5:65–98.
   Google Scholar
• Grue J. Critical discourse analysis, topoi and mystification: disability policy documents from a Norwegian NGO. Discourse Stud. 2009;11:305–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad P, Bergey M. The impending globalization of ADHD: notes on the expansion and growth of a medicalized disorder. Soc Sci Med. 2014;122:31–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiring M. Rehabilitation between management and knowledge practices: an historical overview of Norwegian welfare reforms. Policy Soc. 2012;31:119–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt J, von Groote P, DeLisa J, et al. A policy process and tools for international non-governmental organizations in the health sector using ISPRM as a case in point. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:823–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann A. Democratic education. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Skempes D, Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Health-related rehabilitation and human rights: analyzing states' obligations under the United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:163–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andelic N, Ye J, Tornas S, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of an early-initiated, continuous chain of rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:1313–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgøy I, Ravneberg B, Solvang P. The construction of independence in service relations. Disabil Soc. 2003;18:471–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moat KA, Lavis JN, Clancy SJ, et al. Assessing views about and intentions to act on evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues across a range of countries, issues and groups. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92:20–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arokiasamy CV. A theory of rehabilitation. Rehabil Educ. 2003;7:77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Dean SG. Theory development and a science of rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1493–1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Dean SG. Theory development and a science of rehabilitation: authors' response to commentaries. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1517–1519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zola IK. Toward the necessary universalizing of a dis-ability policy. Milbank Q. 1989;67:401–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M. The politics of disablement. Critical texts in social work and the welfare state. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Perspectives on disability & rehabilitation: contesting assumptions; challenging practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt J, Hofer P, Arenz S, et al. Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields: part III: scientific journals. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:308–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar