Creating an inclusive mall environment with the PRECEDE-PROCEED model: a living lab case study

References

• Zakus JDL, Lysack CL. Revisiting community participation. Health Policy Plan. 1998;13:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Disability in Canada: initial findings from the Canadian Survey on Disability. In: Division SaAS, editor. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Milner P, Kelly B. Community participation and inclusion: people with disabilities defining their place. Disabil Soc. 2009;24:47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonschot MM, De Witte LP, Reichrath E, et al. Community participation of people with an intellectual disability: a review of empirical findings. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009;53:303–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell EY, Waite LJ. Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. J Health Soc Behav. 2009;50:31–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hedhli K, Chebat JC, Sirgy MJ. Shopping well-being at the mall: construct, antecedents, and consequences. J Bus Res. 2013;66:856–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng CF. Satisfying shoppers’ psychological needs: from public market to cyber-mall. J Environ Psychol. 2003;23:439–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YK, Kang J, Kim M. The relationships among family and social interaction, loneliness, mall shopping motivation, and mall spending of older consumers. Psychol Market. 2005;22:995–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaine B, Labbé D, Poldma T, et al. Exploring the facilitators and barriers to shopping mall use by persons with disabilities and strategies for improvements: perspectives from persons with disabilities, rehabilitation professionals and shopkeepers. ALTER-European J Disabil Res. 2014;8:217–229.
   Google Scholar
• Barker RG. Habitats, environments, and human behavior: studies in ecological psychology and eco-behavioral science from the Midwest Psychological Field Station, 1947–1972. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Barr JJ, Bracchitta K. Attitudes toward individuals with disabilities: the effects of contact with different disability types. Current Psychologie. 2015;34:223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton M. Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people. Gerontologist. 1983;23:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton MP, Brody EM, Turner-Massey P. The relationships of environmental factors to changes in well-being. Gerontologist. 1978;18:133–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton MP. The elderly in context perspectives from environmental psychology and gerontology. Environ Behav. 1985;17:501–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowles GD. Growing old “inside”: aging and attachment to place in an Appalachian community. In: Lohmann NDaN, editor. Transitions of aging. New York: Academic Press; 1980. p. 153–170.
   Google Scholar
• Rowles GD. Evolving images of place in aging and “aging in place”. Generations. 1993;17:65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kehayia E, Swaine B. A rehabilitation living lab: creating enabling physical and social environments to optimize social inclusion and social participation of people with disabilities. Submission to FRSQ Strategic Innovative Project (Projet strategique innovant). McGill University, Université de Montréal, Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation (CRIR): FRSQ; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Poldma T, Kehayia E, Swaine B. Building community together through collaborative research: an innovative living lab. In: Vaikla-Poldma T, editor. Meanings of Designed Spaces. New York: Fairchild Books; 2013:374–386
   Google Scholar
• Afacan Y. Achieving inclusion in public spaces: a shopping mall case study. In: Langdon P, PR JC, Lazar J et al., editors. Designing inclusive systems. London: Springer; 2012. p. 85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Poldma T, Labbé D, Bertin S, et al. Understanding people’s needs in a commercial public space: about accessibility and lived experience in social settings. ALTER-European J Disabil Res. 2014;8:206–216.
   Google Scholar
• Dong H, Cassim J, Coleman R, et al. Design for inclusivity: a practical guide to accessible, innovative and user-centred design. Aldershot, Hampshire: Gower Publishing Ltd; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld ED. Theory as a basis for research on enabling environments. In: Steinfeld ED, editor. Enabling environments: measuring the impact of the environment on disability and rehabilitation. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. p. 11–34.
   Google Scholar
• Amsel R, Fichten CS. Effects of contact on thoughts about interaction with students who have a physical disability. J Rehabil. 1988;54:61–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler-Jones D. The Chief Public Health Officer’s report on the state of public health in Canada, 2010: growing older–adding life to years. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Picard R, Poilpot L. Pertinence et valeur du concept de ≪Laboratoire vivant≫ (Living Lab) en santé et autonomie. In: Le Conseil général de l'économie dli, de l'énergie et des technologies, editor. France: Ministère de L'Économie des finances et de l'Industrie; 2011;38.
   Google Scholar
• Dubé P, Sarrailh J, Billebaud C, et al. Qu’est-ce qu'un living lab? Le livre blanc des living labs. Montréal: Umvelt; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Green L, Kreuter W. Health promotion planning: an educational and ecological approach. 3rd edition. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health program planning: an educational and ecological approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Porter CM. Revisiting Precede–Proceed: a leading model for ecological and ethical health promotion. Health Educ J. 2016,75:753–764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby R, Noar SM. What is a planning model? An introduction to PRECEDE‐PROCEED. J Public Health Dent. 2011;9:271–280.
   Google Scholar
• Rezapour B, Mostafavi F, Khalkhali HR. School-based and PRECEDE-PROCEED-Model intervention to promote physical activity in the high school students: case study of Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 2016;8:271–280
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto K, Zuniga C, Nakamura J, et al. Integrating an infectious disease program into the primary health care service: a retrospective analysis of Chagas disease community-based surveillance in Honduras. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadrian H, Morowatisharifabad MA, Bahmanpour K. Development of a rheumatoid arthritis education program using the PRECEDE_PROCEED Model. Health Promot Perspect. 2011;1:118–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research?. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1667–1676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM. Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther. 2006;86:726–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Grasso F, Desjardins M, Labbé D, et al. Opérationnaliser l’inclusion dans les projets innovants. L’expérience du ≪MALL≫ à l’aune de la classification internationale du fonctionnement. ALTER-European J Disabil Res. 2014;8:158–169.
   Google Scholar
• Kehayia E, Swaine B, Longo C, et al. Creating a rehabilitation living lab to optimize participation and inclusion for persons with physical disabilities. ALTER-European J Disabil Res. 2014;8:151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Mazurik K, Desjardins M, de Grosbois È, et al. Individual stakes and collective ideology in tension: looking at physical and spatial obstacles from an experiential perspective. ALTER-European J Disabil Res. 2014;8:194–205.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H, Levert M-J. Supporting people with traumatic brain injury in their use of public spaces: identifying facilitating factors and obstacles. ALTER-European J Disabil Res. 2014;8:183–193.
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins M, Ville I, Mazurik K. De quelques constructions théoriques et méthodologiques des obstacles à la participation sociale, le cas du projet CRIR-Living lab vivant. ALTER-European J Disabil Res. 2014;8:141–145.
   Google Scholar
• Torkia C, Reid D, Korner-Bitensky N, et al. Power wheelchair driving challenges in the community: a users’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2015;10:211–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton PW, Kairy D, Archambault P, et al. The potential impact of intelligent power wheelchair use on social participation: perspectives of users, caregivers and clinicians. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2015;10:191–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kairy D, Rushton PW, Archambault P, et al. Exploring powered wheelchair users and their caregivers’ perspectives on potential intelligent power wheelchair use: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:2244–2261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari C, Shun PLW, Le Dorze G, et al. Self-generated strategic behavior in an ecological shopping task. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68:67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger C, Leduc E, Labbé D, et al. Mobile applications for participation at the shopping mall: content analysis and usability for persons with physical disabilities and communication or cognitive limitations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:12777–12794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamontagne AKE, Bugnariu N, Fung J. Virtual reality reveals mechanisms of balance and locomotor impairments. In: Weiss PL (Tamar) KE LM, editor. Virtual Reality Technologies for Physical and Motor Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Springer; 2014. p. 169–202.
   Google Scholar
• Babulal GM, Bahkshi P, Kopriva S, et al. Measuring participation for persons with mental illness: a systematic review assessing relevance of existing scales for low- and middle-income countries. BMC Psychol. 2015;3:36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar