Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation

References

• Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gabel CP, Bennett P. Cross cultural adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forget NJ, Higgins J. Comparison of generic patient-reported outcome measures used with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: linking process using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:327–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, et al. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature. 2010;463:531–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stief T, Peikenkamp K. A new insole measurement system to detect bending and torsional moments at the human foot during footwear condition: a technical report. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8:49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaoulla P, Frescos N, Menz HB. A survey of foot problems in community-dwelling older Greek Australians. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011;4:23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, et al. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:968–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RL, Hutt DM, Wukich DK. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Diabetes Mellitus. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:297–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcia CR, Martin RL, Drouin JM. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008;43:179–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston MN, Hoch JM, Gabriner ML, et al. Clinical and laboratory measures associated with health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Phys Ther Sport. 2015;16:169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauck T, Lohrer H. Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:785–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borloz S, Crevoisier X, Deriaz O, et al. Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Bravini E, et al. Foot and ankle ability measure: cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL). Med Lav. 2014;105:357–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Negahban H, et al. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 2010;18:755–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uematsu D, Suzuki H, Sasaki S, et al. Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure. J Athl Train. 2015;50:65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira TS, Magalhães LC, Silva RD, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;15:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunakul M, Arunakul P, Suesiritumrong C, et al. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) subjective form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98:561–567.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fennig CD, Simons GF, Lewis MP, editors. Ethnologue: languages of Asia. 18th ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis MP. Ethnologue: languages of the World, 16th ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• UN [Internet]. New York:. UNITS NATIONS, 2015 [cited 15 Oct 2015]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/official-languages/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cuesta-Vargas AI, González-Sánchez M. Spanish version of the screening Örebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñiz J, Elosua P, Hambleton RK. International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation. Psicothema. 2013, 25:151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Mazza J, et al. A review of the foot function index and the foot function index – revised. J Foot Ankle Res. 2013;6:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budiman-Mak E, Conrad K, Stuck R, et al. Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:519–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu SH, Liang HW, Hou WH. Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Foot Function Index. J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107:111–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-12: How to score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: The Health Institute;1995.
   Google Scholar
• Lam CLK, Wong CKH, Lam ETP, et al. Population Norm of Chinese (HK) SF-12 Health Survey_Version 2 of Chinese Adults in Hong Kong. HK Pract. 2010;32:77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lee HY, Hung MC, Hu FC, et al. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) health states with the time tradeoff method in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112:699–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vet HC, Ostelo RW, Terwee CB, et al. Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:131–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998;26:217–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford PW. Getting more from the Literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Can. 2004;56:27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract assess, res eval 2005;10:1–9.
   Google Scholar