Implementing multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary care – a health care professional perspective

References

• Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momsen A-M, Rasmussen JO, Nielsen CV, et al. Multidisciplinary team care in rehabilitation: an overview of reviews. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:901–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson U. The epidemiology of chronic pain in a general population: results of a survey in southern Sweden. Scand J Rheumatol. 2010;39:421–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice AS, Smith BH, Blyth FM. Pain and the global burden of disease. Pain. 2016;157:791–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scascighini L, Toma V, Dober-Spielmann S, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47:670–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlund A, Ropponen A, Alexanderson K. Multidisciplinary interventions: review of studies of return to work after rehabilitation for low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn A, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU). Methods of Treating Chronic Pain: a systematic review. [In Swedish: Metoder för behandling av långvarig smärta. En systematisk litteraturöversikt] Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU); 2006.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU). Rehabilitation for chronic pain. A literature review. [In Swedish: Rehabilitering vid långvarig smärta. En systematisk litteraturöversikt.] Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, et al. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR). Agreement between the government and SALAR concerning the 2015 rehabilitation warranty. [In Swedish: Överenskommelse mellan staten och Sveriges kommuner och landsting om rehabiliteringsgarantin 2015.] Stockholm. SKL 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR). Rehabilitation warranty―Knowledge base about mental disorders and pain 2008 [In Swedish: Rehabiliteringsgaranti―Kunskapsunderlag om psykiska diagnoser och smärta 2008.] Stockholm: Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Society of Medicine, The National Board of Health and Welfare, Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions, The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. Indication for MMR in chronic pain. [In Swedish: Nationella medicinska indikationer. Indikationer för multimodal rehabilitering vid långvarig smärta. Rapport 2011:2] Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Sundell K, Beelmann A, Hasson H, et al. Novel programs, international adoptions, or contextual adaptations? Meta-analytical results from German and Swedish intervention research. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1020540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, et al. Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:174–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Riksdag Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. The Patient law. [In Swedish: Patientlagen] Stockholm: Sveriges riksdag; 2014, p. 821.
   Google Scholar
• Norrefalk J-R, Ekholm K, Linder J, et al. Evaluation of a multiprofessional rehabilitation programme for persistent musculoskeletal-related pain: economic benefits of return to work. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xyrichis A, Lowton K. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45:140–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mårtensson L, Dahlin-Ivanoff S. Experiences of a primary health care rehabilitation programme. A focus group study of persons with chronic pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:985–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten P, George S, McLellan L, et al. Disabled people and professionals differ in their perceptions of rehabilitation needs. J Public Health Med. 2000;22:393–399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, et al. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downe-Wamboldt B. Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health Care Women Int. 1992;13:313–321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stenberg G, Pietila Holmner E, Stalnacke BM, et al. Healthcare professional experiences with patients who participate in multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary care – a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICT Services and System Development and Division of Epidemiology and Global Health. OpenCode 3.6. Umeå: and Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine UU, Sweden, 2009. Open Code 3.6. [cited 2016 Aug 26]. Available from: http://www.phmed.umu.se/enheter/epidemiologi/forskning/open-code/.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack B, Kitson A, Harvey G, et al. Getting evidence into practice: the meaning of ‘context’. J Adv Nurs. 2002;38:94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morténius H, Baigi A, Palm L, et al. Impact of the organizational culture on primary care staff members’ intention to engage in research and development. J Health Organ Manage. 2015;29:234–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövgren G, Åström G, Engström B. A care policy and its implementation. Int J Nurs Pract. 2001;7:92–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dannapfel P, Peolsson A, Nilsen P. What supports physiotherapists’ use of research in clinical practice? A qualitative study in Sweden. Implement Sci. 2013;8:31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehti A, Fjellman‐Wiklund A, Stålnacke BM, et al. Walking down ‘Via Dolorosa’from primary health care to the specialty pain clinic–patient and professional perceptions of inequity in rehabilitation of chronic pain. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/scs.12312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Album D, Westin S. Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:182–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare (SOS). Public Health Report 2005. [In Swedish: Folkhälsorapport 2005]. Stockholm. Socialstyrelsen, (Caroline Ardbo ed.); 2005.
   Google Scholar
• McQuay H. Management of Chronic Pain: Help and hope at the bottom of the pile. BMJ. 2008;336:954–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanen S, Välimäki M, Kaila M. Nurses' experiences of guideline implementation: a focus group study. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18:2613–2621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlfjord S, Lindberg M, Bendtsen P, et al. Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: a qualitative study based on implementation theory. BMC Family Pract. 2010;11:60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF, Etz RS, et al. Fidelity versus flexibility: translating evidence-based research into practice. Am J Prevent Med. 2008;35:S381–S389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, et al. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Int Med. 2006;145:265–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin C, Gard G, Fjellman-Wiklund A. Being in an exchange process: experiences of patient participation in multimodal pain rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:580–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekhammar A, Melin L, Thorn J, et al. A sense of increased living space after participating in multimodal rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1137978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein KF, Miclescu A. Effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment for patients with chronic pain in a primary health care unit. Scand J Pain. 2013;4:190–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sander AM, Constantinidou F. The interdisciplinary team. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23:271–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Describing rehabilitation interventions. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:811–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann V, Gutenbrunner C, Fialka-Moser V, et al. Interdisciplinary team working in physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:4–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor BB, Eisenberg DM, Buring JE, et al. Within-team Patterns of communication and referral in multimodal Treatment of chronic Low Back Pain Patients by an Integrative care Team. Glob Adv Health Med. 2015;4:36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar