Screening methods for post-stroke visual impairment: a systematic review

References

• Rowe F, Brand D, Jackson CA, et al. Visual impairment following stroke: do stroke patients require vision assessment? Age Ageing. 2009;38:188–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macintosh C. Stroke re-visited: visual problems following stroke and their effect on rehabilitation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;60:10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hepworth LR, Rowe FJ, Walker MF, et al. Post-stroke visual impairment: a systematic literature review of types and recovery of visual conditions. Ophthalmol Res. 2016;5:1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sand KM, Midelfart A, Thomassen L, et al. Visual impairment in stroke patients – a review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;196:52–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson AC, Lindgren I, Hallstrom B, et al. Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers. Stroke. 2005;36:803–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones SA, Shinton RA. Improving outcome in stroke patients with visual problems. Age Ageing. 2006;35:560–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou E, Hardiess G, Schaeffel F, et al. Assessment of vision-related quality of life in patients with homonymous visual field defects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:1749–1758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe FJ. The importance of accurate visual assessment after stroke. Exp Rev Ophthalmol. 2011;6:133–136.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe FJ, Walker M, Rockliffe J, et al. Care provision and unmet needs for post stroke visual impairment. London; The Stroke Association: 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1006–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elm EV, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Prevent Med. 2007;45:247–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer NA, Velentgas P, Westrich K, et al. The GRACE Checklist for rating the quality of observational studies of comparative effectiveness: a tale of hope and caution. J Manag Care Special Pharm. 2014;20:301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godefroy O, Fickl A, Roussel M, et al. Is the Montreal cognitive assessment superior to the mini-mental state examination to detect poststroke cognitive impairment? A study with neuropsychological evaluation. Stroke. 2011;42:1712–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeyere N, Riddoch MJ, Slavkova ED, et al. The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS): validation of a stroke-specific short cognitive screening tool. Psychol Assess. 2015;27:883–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan B. Assessment of unilateral neglect: a new reading test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1987;9:359–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy TP, Bruce DW, Gray CS. Visual field loss after stroke: confrontation and perimetry in the assessment of recovery. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;10:113–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luukkainen-Markkula R, Tarkka I, Pitkanen K, et al. Comparison of the Behavioral Inattention Test and the Catherine Bergego Scale in assessment of hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21:103–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cermak SA, Lin KC. Assessment of unilateral neglect in individuals with right cerebral vascular accident. Topics Geriatr Rehabil. 1994;10:42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Adams JA. A shortened version of the rivermead perceptual assessment battery? Clin Rehabil. 1989;3:199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke DM, McKenna K, Fleming J. Development of a standardized occupational therapy screening tool for visual perception in adults. Scand J Occup Ther. 2005;12:59–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jolly N, MacFarlane A, Heard R. Towards gaining the best information about vision to assist the recovery of a patient with stroke. Strabismus. 2013;21:145–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowe FJ. Accuracy of referrals for visual assessment in a stroke population. Eye (Lond). 2011;25:161–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyden P, Lu M, Jackson C, et al. Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke scale: results of a factor analysis. Stroke. 1999;30:2347–2354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DF, Hahn MG, Baum CM, et al. Screening patients with stroke for rehabilitation needs: validation of the post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines. Neurorehabil Neur Rep. 2006;20:42–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesshope HJ, Clark MS, Smith DS. The Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery: its application to stroke patients and relationship with function. Clin Rehabil. 1991;5:115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Adams RJ, Meador KJ, Sethi KD, et al. Graded neurologic scale for use in acute hemispheric stroke treatment protocols. Stroke. 1987;18:665–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen SA, Shinton R. A. Screening for visual impairment in older people: validation of the Cardiff Acuity Test. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2003;36:289–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe FJ, Seuke H, Gawley SD. Comparison of Damato campimetry and Humphrey automated perimetry results in a clinical population. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:757–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhotra JS, Mitchell P, Healey PR, et al. Homonymous visual field defects and stroke in an older population. Stroke. 2002;33:2417–2420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townend BS, Sturm JW, Petsoglou C, et al. Perimetric homonymous visual field loss post-stroke. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14:754–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997;28:307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot DB, North I, Flanagan J. Confrontation visual field tests. Opthal Physiol Opt. 1997;17:17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damato BE. Oculokinetic perimetry: a simple visual field test for use in the community. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69:927–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodsi SR, Younge BR. The four-meter confrontation visual field test. J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1993;34:359–368.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson L, N, Baloh FG. The accuracy of confrontation visual field test in comarison with automated perimetry. J Natl Med Assoc. 1991;83:895–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen B, O’Neill B, Evans JJ, et al. A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:790–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridha B, Rossor M. The mini mental state examination. Pract Neurol. 2005;5:298–303.
   Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Sharma VK, Chan BP-L, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of vascular cognitive impairment after acute stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2010;299:15–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittich W, Phillips N, Nasreddine ZS, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the Montreal cognitive assessment modified for individuals who are visually impaired. J Vis Impair Blind. 2010;104:360–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke DM, McKenna K, Fleming J, et al. The reliability of the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test (OT-APST). Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68:509–517.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke DM, McKenna K, Fleming J, et al. Construct and ecological validity of the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test (OT-APST). Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13:49–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torfs K, Vancleef K, Lafosse C, et al. The Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST), an online test to assess mid-level visual perception. Behav Res Meth. 2013;46:472–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu E-C, Wu W-C, Chou C-X, et al. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the test of visual perceptual skills-third edition in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Katz N. Validity of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT): relationships with functional tasks. Am J Occup Ther. 1995;49:507–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan PW, Cockburn J, Wilson BA. The behavioral assessment of visual neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1991;1:5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Leibovitch FS, Vasquez BP, Ebert PL, et al. A short bedside battery for visuoconstructive hemispatial neglect: Sunnybrook Neglect Assessment Procedure (SNAP). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34:359–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fordell H, Bodin K, Bucht G, et al. A virtual reality test battery for assessment and screening of spatial neglect. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011;123:167–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrell BM, Dehlin OI, Dahlgren CJ. Neglect in elderly stroke patients: a comparison of five tests. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997;51:295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi P, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, et al. Sensitivity of clinical and behavioral tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:160–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi P, Bartolomeo P, Beis JM, et al. A battery of tests for the quantitative assessment of unilateral neglect. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24:273–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell AB, Jalas MJ, Tenovuo O, et al. Clinical assessment of hemispatial neglect: evaluation of different measures and dimensions. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;21:479–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferber S, Karnath HO. How to assess spatial neglect–line bisection or cancellation tasks? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001;23:599–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossel S, Eschenbeck P, Weiss PH, et al. Visual extinction in relation to visuospatial neglect after right-hemispheric stroke: quantitative assessment and statistical lesion-symptom mapping. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2011;82:862–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen A, McKenna K, Tallis RC. Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:1196–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan PW, Robertson IH. The assessment of unilateral neglect. UK; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Black SE, Vu B, Martin D, Szalai JP. Evaluation of a bedside battery for hemispatial neglect in acute stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1990;12:109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell I, Kristjansson B, Hill GB, et al. Community screening for dementia: the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) and modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) compared. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:377–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa J, Perrault A, Wolfson C. Reliable individual change scores on the 3MS in older persons with dementia: results from the Canadian study of health and aging. Int Psychogeriatr. 2001;13:71–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar