ImPACT: a multifaceted implementation for conversation partner training in aphasia in Dutch rehabilitation settings

References

• Visser-Meily A, Post M, Gorter JW, et al. Rehabilitation of stroke patients needs a family-centred approach. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wielaert S, van de Sandt-Koenderman WME, Dammers N, et al. Making an ImPACT. Implementing conversation partner training in Dutch rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:e26.
   Google Scholar
• Wielaert SM, Sage K, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, et al. Candidacy for conversation partner training in aphasia. Findings from a Dutch implementation study. Aphasiology. 2016;30:699–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Borduas F, Sales A, et al. CPD and KT: models used and opportunities for synergy. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011;31:167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham I, Logan J, Harrison M, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organisations: systematic review and recommendations. Millbank Q. 2004;82:581–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, et al. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64:143–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Taubert M, Kowalczuk J. Sticky knowledge: a possible model for investigating implementation in healthcare contexts. Implement Sci. 2007;2:44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, et al. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N, Brenneman-Gibson J, et al. Closing the evidence, research, and practice loop: examples of knowledge transfer and exchange from the field of aphasia. Aphasiology. 2010;24:535–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke DJ, Godfrey M, Hawkins R, et al. Implementing a training intervention to support caregivers after stroke: a process evaluation examining the initiation and embedding of programme change. Implement Sci. 2013;8:96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornbaum CC, Kornas K, Peirson L, et al. Exploring the function and effectiveness of knowledge brokers as facilitators of knowledge translation in health-related settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis. Implement Sci. 2015;10:162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SD, Albrecht L, O’Leary K, et al. Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions. Implement Sci. 2012;7:70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43:535–554.
   Google Scholar
• Wensing M, Bosch M, Grol R. Developing and selecting interventions for translating knowledge to action. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E85–E88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavis J, Robertson D, Woodside J, the Knowledge Transfer Study Group, et al. How can research organisations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Millbank Q. 2003;81:221–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham I, et al. Monitoring use of knowledge and evaluating outcome. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E94–E98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döpp CME, Graff MJL, Olde Rikkert MGM, et al. Determinants for the effectiveness of implementing an occupational therapy intervention in routine dementia care. Implement Sci. 2013;8:131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen LR, Løvholt AP, Sørensen IR, et al. Implementation of supported conversation for communication between nursing staff and in-hospital patients with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2015;29:57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Kagan A, O’Neill Christie C, et al. Communicative access and decision making for people with aphasia: implementing sustainable healthcare systems change. Aphasiology. 2007;21:39–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton S, Lane K, Shiggins C. Supporting communication for people with aphasia in stroke rehabilitation: transfer of training in a multidisciplinary stroke team. Aphasiology. 2015;30:629–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBO. Richtlijn Beroerte (Stroke guidelines). Utrecht: CBO; 2009 (in Dutch).
   Google Scholar
• Draper B, Bowring G, Thompson C, et al. Stress in caregivers of aphasic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:122–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser-Meily A, Post M, Port I, et al. Psychosocial functioning of spouses with stroke from initial inpatient rehabilitation to 3 years poststroke. Stroke. 2009;4:1399–1404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe T, Davidson B, Worrall L, et al. ‘You needed to rehab … families as well’: family members’ own goals for aphasia rehabilitation. Int J Lang Com Dis. 2012;47:511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health; 2001. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/ [Accessed 21 March 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Black S, Duchan J, et al. Training volunteers as conversation partners using "Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia" (SCA): a controlled trial. J Speech Lang Res. 2001;44:624–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N. Social approaches to aphasia intervention. In: Chapey R, editor. Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia. 3rd ed. Baltimore (MA): Williams and Wilkins; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson R, Wielaert S. Rehabilitation targeted at everyday communication: can we change the talk of people with aphasia and their significant others within conversation? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:S70–S76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallé MC, Le Dorze G. Understanding significant others’ experience of aphasia and rehabilitation following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1774–1782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson M, Carlsson M, Sonnander K. Working with families of persons with aphasia: a survey of Swedish speech and language pathologists. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:51–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manders E, Mariën A, Janssen V. Informing and supporting partners and children of persons with aphasia: a comparison of supply and demand. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2011;36:139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Raymer A, Armstrong E, et al. Communication partner training in aphasia: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1814–1837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock S, Wilkinson R, Bryan K. Supporting Partners and People with Aphasia in Relationships and Conversation (SPPARC). Speechmark: Oxon; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wielaert S, Wilkinson R. Partners van Afasiepatiënten Conversatie Training (PACT). Bohn Stafleu van Loghum: Houten; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wielaert SM, Berns PEG, van de Sandt-Koenderman WME, et al. ‘… Now it is about me having to learn something…’ Partners’ experiences with a Dutch conversation partner training programme (PACT). Int J Lang Com Dis. 2016; early online.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall;1984.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwers M, Stacey D, O’Connor A. Knowledge creation: synthesis, tools and products. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E68–E72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster A, Dickerson J, Melbourn A, on behalf of the TRACS trial collaboration, et al. The development and implementation of the structured training programme for caregivers of inpatients after stroke (TRACS) intervention: the London Stroke Carers Training Course. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29:211–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Co.; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Groot A. de. Goed bekeken: Tien jaar Video Interactie Begeleiding in de ouderenzorg (in Dutch) (Video Interaction Guidance). Denkbeeld. 2006;18:2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Nederlandse Zorg Autoriteit (NZA) (in Dutch) (Dutch Health care Authority). Available from: https://www.nza.nl/regelgeving/tarieven/ [Accessed 16 February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• CIZ indicatiewijzer. Toelichting op de beleidsregels Indicatiestelling AWBZ 2013, zoals vastgesteld door het ministerie van VWS. (in Dutch) (Chronic care Act). Available from: http://www.ciz.nl/sites/ciz/files/filemanager/indicatiewijzer/Indicatiewijzer_60.pdf [Accessed 2014 September 2].
   Google Scholar
• Le Dorze G, Signori F. Needs, barriers and facilitators experienced by spouses of people with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:1073–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michallet B, Tétreault S, Le Dorze G. The consequences of severe aphasia on the spouses of aphasic people: a description of the adaptation process. Aphasiology. 2003;17:835–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper T, Holland A, Rewega M. Conversational coaching: treatment outcomes and future directions. Aphasiology. 2002;16:745–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young ME, Lutz BJ, Creasy KR, et al. A comprehensive assessment of family caregivers of stroke survivors during inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1892–1902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton R, Leenhouts S, Webster J, et al. Information, support and training needs of relatives of people with aphasia: evidence from the literature. Aphasiology. 2014;28:797–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FAS, Kayes NM, McCann C, et al. Hope in people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2013;27:41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravel K, Légaré F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implement Sci. 2006;1:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen M, Stoopendaal A, Kelder M, et al. Innovation in rehabilitation. A qualitative evaluation of the Rehabilitation Innovation Programme. Report of the Institute of Health Policy & Management (in Dutch). Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke. 2003;34:987–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakheit AM, Shaw S, Barrett L, et al. A prospective, randomized, parallel group, controlled study of the effect of intensity of speech and language therapy on early recovery from poststroke aphasia. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:885–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson M, Chilton R, Wyatt K, et al. Implementing health promotion programmes in schools: a realist systematic review of research and experience in the United Kingdom. Implement Sci. 2015;10:149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar