Development and validation of a prediction model for long-term sickness absence based on occupational health survey variables

References

• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Vingård E, Alexanderson K, Norlund A. Consequences of being on sick leave. Scand J Public Health. 2004;Suppl 32:207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen J, Bjorner JB, Burr H, et al. Transitions between sickness absence, work, unemployment, and disability in Denmark 2004–2008. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38:516–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labriola M. Conceptual framework of sickness absence and return to work, focusing on both the individual and the contextual level. Work. 2008;30:377–387.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lund T, Kivimäki M, Labriola M, et al. Using administrative sickness absence data as a marker of future disability pension: the prospective DREAM study of Danish private sector employees. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65:28–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionne CE, Bourbonnais R, Frémont P, et al. A clinical return-to-work rule for patients with back pain. CMAJ. 2005;172:1559–1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers T, van der Windt DA, van der Heijden GJ, et al. A prediction rule for shoulder pain related sick leave: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heymans MW, Anema JR, van Buuren S, et al. Return to work in a cohort of low back pain patients: development and validation of a clinical prediction rule. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:155–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois M, Szpalski M, Donceel P. Patients at risk of long-term sick leave because of low back pain. Spine J. 2009;9:350–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JH, de Boer AG, et al. Predicting the duration of sickness absence for patients with common mental disorders in occupational health care. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:67–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen J, Gerds TA, Bjorner JB, et al. Prediction of future labour market outcome in a cohort of long-term sick-listed Danes. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr H, Bjorner JB, Kristensen TS, et al. Trends in the Danish work environment in 1990–2000 and their associations with labor-force changes. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003;29:270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund T, Labriola M, Christensen KB, et al. Psychosocial work environment exposures as risk factors for long-term sickness absence among Danish employees: results from DWECS/DREAM. Occup Environ Med. 2005;47:1141e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund T, Labriola M, Villadsen E. Who is at risk for long-term sickness absence? A prospective cohort study of Danish employees. Work. 2007;28:225–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Labriola M, Holte KA, Christensen KB, et al. The attribution of work environment in explaining gender differences in long-term sickness absence: results from the prospective DREAM study. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68:703–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen KB, Labriola M, Lund T, et al. Explaining the social gradient in long-term sickness absence: a prospective study of Danish employees. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:181–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen KB, Lund T, Labriola M, et al. The impact of health behaviour on long term sickness absence: results from DWECS/DREAM. Ind Health. 2007;45:348–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen KB, Lund T, Labriola M, et al. The fraction of long-term sickness absence attributable to work environmental factors: prospective results from the Danish Work Environment Cohort *Study. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64:487–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund T, Labriola M, Christensen KB, et al. Physical work environment risk factors for long term sickness absence: prospective findings among a cohort of 5357 employees in Denmark. BMJ. 2006;332:449–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund T, Labriola M, Christensen KB, et al. Psychosocial work environment exposures as risk factors for long-term sickness absence among Danish employees: results from DWECS/DREAM. J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47:1141–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr H, Pedersen J, Hansen JV. Work environment as predictor of long-term sickness absence: linkage of self-reported DWECS data with the DREAM register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;Suppl 7:147–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose D, Harrison E. The European Socio-economic Classification: a new social class schema for comparative European research – Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER). Eur Soc. 2007;9:459–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavaddat N, Kinmonth AL, Sanderson S, et al. What determines self-rated health (SRH)? A cross-sectional study of SF-36 health domains in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2011;65:800–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen SV, Rugulies R, Hjarsberg PU, et al. The predictive value of mental health for long-term sickness absence: the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) and the Mental Health Inventory (MHI) compared. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilmarinen J. Work ability – a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen SV, Burr H, Diderichsen F, et al. A one-item workability measure mediates work demands, individual resources and health in the prediction of sickness absence. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013;86:755–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijon O, Wiktorin C, Härenstam A, et al. Validity of a self-administered questionnaire for assessing physical work loads in a general population. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44:724–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pejtersen JH, Kristensen TS, Borg V, et al. The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scand J Public Health. 2010;Suppl 3:8–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen SV, Bjørner JB. Reliability of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scand J Public Health. 2010;Suppl 3:25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjollund NH, Larsen FB, Andersen JH. Register-based follow-up of social benefits and other transfer payments: accuracy and degree of completeness in a Danish interdepartmental administrative database compared with a population-based survey. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35:497–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyerberg EW. Clinical prediction models. New York: Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen H-T, Ingebrigtsen T. Social class and sickness absence in Norway. Acta Sociol. 2008;51:309–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. Paris: OECD Publications; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Löve J, Hensing G, Holmgren K, et al. Explaining the social gradient in sickness absence: a study of a general working population in Sweden. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchior M, Krieger N, Kawachi I, et al. Work factors and occupational class disparities in sickness absence: findings from the GAZEL Cohort Study. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1206–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:710–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boslaugh S. Secondary data sources for public health: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Persson R, Kristiansen J. The challenge of assessing the psychosocial working environment: why some self-reports should not be interpreted as environmental exposures. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69:932–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar