203
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Establishing the Turkish version of the SIGAM mobility scale, and determining its validity and reliability in lower extremity amputees

, , &
Pages 346-352 | Received 21 Oct 2015, Accepted 15 Oct 2016, Published online: 20 Nov 2016

References

  • Terry Canale S, Beaty JH. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. 12th ed. Chapter 14. Maryland Heights, Missouri: Mosby; 2012. p. 598–611.
  • Demet K, Martinet N, Guillemin F, et al. Health related quality of life and related factors in 539 persons with amputation of upper and lower limb. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:480–486.
  • de Laat FA, Rommers GM, Geertzen JH, et al. Construct validity and test–retest reliability of the questionnaire rising and sitting down in lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1305–1310.
  • Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG, et al. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:931–938.
  • Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Factor structure of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb amputations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:506–513.
  • Ryall NH, Eyres SB, Neumann VC, et al. The SIGAM mobility grades: a new population-specific measure for lower limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:833–844.
  • Rommers GM, Ryall NH, Kap A, et al. The mobility scale for lower limb amputees: the SIGAM/WAP mobility scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1106–1115.
  • Joussain MC, Ryall N, Laroche D, et al. French version of the SIGAM mobility scale: cross-cultural validation of its psychometric properties. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Masson; 2013.
  • Joussain MC, Ryall N, Casillas JM, et al. French version of the SIGAM mobility scale: cross-cultural translation. Educational presentation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Masson; 2013.
  • Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Supported by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Institute for Work & Health. Recommendations for the Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Health Status Measures; 1998.
  • Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1417–1432.
  • Acquadro C, Conway K, Hareendran A, et al. Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value Health. 2008;11:509–521.
  • Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305:160.
  • Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Ölmez N, et al. Kısa Form-36 (KF-36)’nın Türkçe Versiyonunun Güvenilirliği ve Geçerliliği. İlaç Ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999;12:102–106.
  • Şimşek İE, Şener G, Yakut Y. Unilateral alt ekstremite amputelerinde Protez Memnuniyeti Anketi’nin Türkçe güvenirliği ve geçerliği: Pilot Çalışma. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2010;21:81–86.
  • Viosca E, Martínez JL, Almagro PL, et al. Proposal and validation of a new functional ambulation classification scale for clinical use. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1234–1238.
  • Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the ‘get-up and go’ test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:387–389.
  • Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
  • Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.
  • Metin Y. İstatistiğe Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014;36:59–75.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
  • Sinha R, van den Heuvel WJA, Arokiasamy P. Factors affecting quality of life in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35:90–96.
  • Sinha R, Van Den Heuvel WJA. A systematic literature review of quality of life in lower limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:883–899.
  • Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J. 2002;95:875–883.
  • Esquenazi A. Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:831–836.
  • McAnelly RD, Faulkner VW. In: Braddom RL, Buschbacher RM, Dumitru D, editors. Physical medicine and rehabilitation. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company; 1996. p. 286–320.
  • Saeed AB, Saeed UB, Zain-Ur-Rehman M. Factors affecting functional outcome after lower extremity amputation. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015;65:220–224.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.