Rasch validation of the Arabic version of the lower extremity functional scale

References

• Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, et al. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther. 1999;79:371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Melloh M, Burkett B, et al. Lower limb functional index: development and clinimetric properties. Phys Ther. 2012;92:98–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pua YH, Cowan SM, Wrigley TV, et al. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale could be an alternative to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index physical function scale. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1103–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CW, Moseley AM, Refshauge KM, et al. The lower extremity functional scale has good clinimetric properties in people with ankle fracture. Phys Ther. 2009;89:580–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacchio A, De Blasis E, Necozione S, et al. The Italian version of the lower extremity functional scale was reliable, valid, and responsive. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:550–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Diaz D, Lomas-Vega R, Osuna-Perez MC, et al. The Spanish lower extremity functional scale: a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to assess musculoskeletal disorders in the lower extremity. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:2005–2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogeboom TJ, de Bie RA, den Broeder AA, et al. The Dutch Lower Extremity Functional Scale was highly reliable, valid and responsive in individuals with hip/knee osteoarthritis: a validation study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou WH, Yeh TS, Liang HW. Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014;113:313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metsavaht L, Leporace G, Riberto M, et al. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the lower extremity functional scale into a Brazilian Portuguese version and validation on patients with knee injuries. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:932–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Torka S, et al. The German Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is reliable, valid and responsive in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. Qual Life Res 2015;24:405–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negahban H, Hessam M, Tabatabaei S, et al. Reliability and validity of the Persian lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) in a heterogeneous sample of outpatients with lower limb musculoskeletal disorders. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:10–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasi S, Papathanasiou G, Anagnostou M, et al. Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Cross-Cultural Adaption into Greek and Reliability Properties of the Instrument. Health Sci J. 2012;6:750–773.
   Google Scholar
• Alnahdi AH, Alrashid GI, Alkhaldi HA, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:897–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnahdi AH. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale. Int J Rehabil Res. 2016;39:36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York: Routledge; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M. Rasch models in health. London: ISTE-Wiley; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhard G. Invariant measurement: using Rasch models in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1358–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghaei P. The Rasch model as a construct validation tool. Rasch Meas Trans. 2008;22:1145–1146.
   Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, et al. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:1094–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:308–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton M, Tennant A. Patient reported outcomes: misinference from ordinal scales?. Trials. 2011;12:A65-A.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D, Sheridan BE, Luo G. RUMM2030-professional edition (Rasch unidimensional measurement model, version 5.4) [computer software]. Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton CB, Chesworth BM. A Rasch-validated version of the upper extremity functional index for interval-level measurement of upper extremity function. Phys Ther 2013;93:1507–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich DA. Category ordering and their utility. Rasch Meas Trans. 1996;9:464.
   Google Scholar
• Hagquist C, Bruce M, Gustavsson JP. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:380–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Pallant JF. DIF matters: as practical approach to test if differential item functioning makes a difference. Rasch Meas Trans. 2007;20:1082–1084.
   Google Scholar
• Smith EV. Jr., Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:205–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tennant A, Pallant JF. Unidimensionality matters. Rasch Meas Trans. 2006;20:1048–1051.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibrations stability. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;7:328.
   Google Scholar
• Masters G. A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978;43:561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Investigating rating scale category utility. J Outcome Meas. 1999;3:103–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baghaei P. Local dependency and Rasch measures. Rasch Meas Trans. 2008;21:1105–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Bravini E, Giordano A, Sartorio F, et al. Rasch analysis of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale: insights on dimensionality and suggestions for an improved 15-item version. Clin Rehabil. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0269215516647180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart DL, Mioduski JE, Stratford PW. Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:629–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford PW, Hart DL, Binkley JM, et al. Interpreting lower extremity functional status scores. Physiother Canada. 2005;57:154–162.
   Google Scholar