Experiences of using information and communication technology within the first year after stroke – a grounded theory study

References

• Iosa M, Morone G, Fusco A, et al. Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:187965.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Findahl O. The Swedes and the Internet – summary 2015. The Internet Foundation in Sweden; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, et al. Stroke. Lancet. 2008;371:1612–1623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallström B, Jönsson A-C, Nerbrand C, et al. Stroke incidence and survival in the beginning of the 21st century in southern Sweden: comparisons with the late 20th century and projections into the future. Stroke. 2008;39:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidetti S, Ytterberg C, Ekstam L, et al. Changes in the impact of stroke between 3 and 12 months post-stroke, assessed with the stroke impact scale. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:963–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, et al. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Guidelines for Strokecare 2009/Nationella riktlinjer för strokesjukvård 2009: stöd för styrning och ledning. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen/The National Board for Health and Welfare; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstam L, Uppgard B, Von Koch L, et al. Functioning in everyday life after stroke: a longitudinal study of elderly people receiving rehabilitation at home. Scand J Caring Sci. 2007;21:434–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katalinic O, Young A, Doolan D. Case study: the Interact home telehealth project. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:418–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Lund M, Lvgren-Engstrm A-L, Lexell J. Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:402–411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoover EL, Carney A. Integrating the iPad into an intensive, comprehensive aphasia program. Semin Speech Lang. 2014;35:25–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo G, Dittelman J. Using mobile technology with individuals with aphasia: native iPad features and everyday apps. Semin Speech Lang. 2014;35:5–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krpic A, Savanovic A, Cikajlo I. Telerehabilitation: remote multimedia-supported assistance and mobile monitoring of balance training outcomes can facilitate the clinical staff's effort. Int J Rehabil Res. 2013;36:162–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist E, Borell L. Computer-based assistive technology and changes in daily living after stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7:364–371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White J, Janssen H, Jordan L, et al. Tablet technology during stroke recovery: a survivor’s perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1186–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg S. The results from a two-year case study of an information and communication technology support system for family caregivers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:353–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crotty M, Killington M, van den Berg M, et al. Telerehabilitation for older people using off-the-shelf applications: acceptability and feasibility. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20:370–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engström A-LL, Lexell J, Lund ML. Difficulties in using everyday technology after acquired brain injury: a qualitative analysis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17:233–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassberg A-C, Prellwitz M, Larsson Lund M. The challenges of everyday technology in the workplace for persons with acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;20:272–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Norrwing B. Riksstroke/The Swedish stroke register, 2016 [cited 2016 Oct 21]. Available from: www.riksstroke.org.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion [in Swedish]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Doody O, Slevin E, Taggart L. Focus group interviews in nursing research: part 1. Br J Nurs. 2013;22:16–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, et al. Rasch analysis of a new stroke- specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, et al. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamwesiga JT, Tham K, Guidetti S. Experiences of using mobile phones in everyday life among persons with stroke and their families in Uganda – a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;19:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkevold M, Bergland D. The quality of qualitative data: Issues to consider when interviewing participants who have difficulties providing detailed accounts of their experiences. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2007;2:68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Halkier B. Focus groups as social enactments: integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qual Res. 2010;10:71–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfasoft. NVivo software NVivo 10 ed.; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison AJ, Johnston LH, Breckon JD. Using QSR‐NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2010;13:283–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman CL. Occupational balance: exploring the relationships among daily occupations and their influence on well-being. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:202–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedman A, Lindqvist E, Nygard L. How older adults with mild cognitive impairment relate to technology as part of present and future everyday life: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgren M, Nygard L, Kottorp A. Technology and everyday functioning in people with intellectual disabilities: a Rasch analysis of the everyday technology use questionnaire (ETUQ). J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011;55:610–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowsky C, Nygard L, Kottorp A. Psychometric evaluation of a new assessment of the ability to manage technology in everyday life. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;18:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson LA, Miller WC, Eng JJ. Effect of stroke on fall rate, location and predictors: a prospective comparison of older adults with and without stroke (falls after recent stroke). PLoS One. 2011;6:19431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva CP, Carlegis M, Suchma K, et al. Falling, balance confidence, and fear of falling after chronic stroke. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2014;32:353–367.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: theory and application. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
   Google Scholar