Validity and reliability of an activity monitor to quantify arm movements and activity in adults following distal radius fracture

References

• Bradley C, Harrison J. Descriptive epidemiology of traumatic fractures in Australia. Vol 17. Adelaide: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen CF, Lauritsen J. Epidemiology of acute wrist trauma. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22:911–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handoll HH, Madhok R, Howe TE. Rehabilitation for distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart HD, Innes AR, Burke FD. Factors affecting the outcome of colles' fracture: an anatomical and functional study. Injury. 1985;16:289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder A, Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, et al. Exercise reduces impairment and improves activity in people after some upper limb fractures: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2011;57:71–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handoll HHG, Ollivere BJ, Rollins KE. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;11.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson SA, Mawson SJ, Stanley D. Rehabilitation after two-part fractures of the neck of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:B:419–422.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lefevre-Colau MM, Babinet A, Fayad F, et al. Immediate mobilization compared with conventional immobilization for the impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:A:2585–2590.
   Google Scholar
• Heil D. Predicting activity energy expenditure using the Actical activity monitor. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006;77:64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallis J, Saelens E. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations and future directions. Research Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth B, Haskell W, Whitt M, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:S498–S516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Adel C, Wolterbeek N, Doorenbosch C, et al. Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. Gait Posture. 2008;27:120–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Niet M, Bussmann J, Ribbers G, et al. The stroke upper-limb activity monitor: Its sensitivity to measure hemiplegic upper-limb activity during daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1121–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, et al. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1498–1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, et al. Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1340–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Miltner W, Foo B, et al. Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. Stroke. 2000;31:662–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorkoiv M, Rodgers H, Price C. Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: a systematic review of clinical studies. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Eng J. Arm-hand use in healthy older adults. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64:877–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDermid JC. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) user manual. Ontario, Canada: McMaster University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bruder A, Shields N, Dodd K, et al. A progressive exercise and structured advice program does not improve activity more than structured advice alone following a distal radial fracture: a multi-centre phase I/II randomised controlled trial. J Physiother. 2016;62:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay S, McMahon M, Stiller K. An advice and exercise program has some benefits over natural recovery after distal radius fracture: a randomised trial. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54:253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krischak GD, Krasteva A, Schneider F, et al. Physiotherapy after volar plating of wrist fractures is effective using a home exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:537–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAL Technologies. ActivePAL operating guide. Glasgow: PAL Techonologies Ltd; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Grant P, Ryan C, Tigbe WW, et al. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:992–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Doner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17:101–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoukri MM, Asyali MH, Donner A. Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Stat Methods Med Res 2004;13:251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson A, Howard D, Tan WH, et al. Minimal clinically important differences of three patient-rated outcomes instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:641–649.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altman DG. Comparability of randomised groups. Statistician. 1985;34:125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Howell DC. Statistical methods for psychology. 3rd ed. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Company; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Jones MJ, Grimmer K, Edwards I, et al. Challenges in applying best evidence to physiotherapy practice: part 2 – health and clinical reasoning models to facilitate evidence-based practice. Int J Allied Hth Sci Prac. 2006;4:6.
   Google Scholar
• Jones B, Jarvis P, Lewis J, et al. Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods. BMJ. 1996;313:36–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G, Sloan J, Wyrwich K. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J, Altman D. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, Graham K. Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometric strength testing in young people with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:77–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Chen KY, Bassett DR. The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S490–S500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawinger E, Uhl T, Abel M, et al. Assessment of accelerometers for measuring upper-extremity physical activity. J Sport Rehabil. 2015;24:236–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernmark E, Wiktorin C. A triaxial accelerometer for measuring arm movements. Appl Ergon. 2002;33:541–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta-Vargas A, Galan-Mercant A, Williams J. The use of inertial sensors system for human motion analysis. Phys Ther Rev. 2010;15:462–473.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schasfoort FC, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ Ambulatory measurement of upper limb usage and mobility-related activities during normal daily life with an upper limb-activity monitor: a feasibility study. Med Bio Eng Comput. 2002;40:173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Gonzalez A, Granat MH. Continuous monitoring of upper-limb activity in free-living environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:541–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizawa J, Masuda T, Koyama T, et al. Three-dimensional motion of the upper extremity joints during various activities of daily living. J Biomech. 2010;43:2915–2922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates DH, Walters LS, Cowley J, et al. Range of motion requirements for upper-limb activities of daily living. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70:7001350010p1–700135001p10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janaudis-Ferreira T, Mathur S, Romano J, et al. Arm activity during daily life in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016;36:125–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trost SG, McIver KI, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S531–SS43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CJ, Denehy L, Holland AE, et al. Measurement of functional activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28:402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar