How physical therapists instruct patients with stroke: an observational study on attentional focus during gait rehabilitation after stroke

References

• Zinn S, Bosworth HB, Hoenig HM, et al. Executive function deficits in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:173–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, et al. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013;6:77–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Wally R. An external focus of attention enhances balance learning in older adults. Gait Post. 2010;32:572–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kal EC, Van der Kamp J, Houdijk H. External attentional focus enhances movement automatization: a comprehensive test of the constrained action hypothesis. Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32:527–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, et al. Benefits of an external focus of attention: common coding or conscious processing?. J Sports Sci. 2006;24:89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli SE, Trombly CA, Tickle-Degnen L, et al. Effect of instructions on functional reach in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:380–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mückel S, Mehrholz J. Immediate effects of two attention strategies on trunk control on patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:632–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham K, Sackley CM, Wright CC, et al. Attentional focus of feedback for improving performance of reach-to-grasp after stroke: a randomised crossover study. Physiotherapy. 2014;10:108–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kal EC, Van der Kamp J, Houdijk H, et al. Stay focused! The effects of internal and external focus of attention on movement automaticity in patients with stroke. Plos One. 2015;10:e0136917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins D, Carson HJ, Toner J. Letter to the editor concerning the article “Performance of gymnastic skill benefits from an external focus of attention” by Abdollahipour, Wulf, Psotta & Nietto. J Sports Sci. 2016;34:1288--1292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham K, Van Vliet PM, Badger F, et al. Use of information feedback and attentional focus of feedback in treating the person with a hemiplegic arm. Physiother Res Int. 2009;14:77–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson L, Burridge JH, Demain SH. Internal and external focus of attention during gait re-education: an observational study of physical therapist practice in stroke rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2013;93:957–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer H, Munzert J. Influence of attentional focus on skilled motor performance: performance decrement under unfamiliar focus conditions. Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32:730–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unesco. International standard classification of education ISCED 1997. UNESCO; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, et al. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1314–1319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roorda LD, Green J, De Kluis KRA, et al. Excellent cross-cultural validity, intra-test reliability and construct validity of the Dutch Rivermead Mobility Index in patients after stroke undergoing rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40:727–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:1018–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen AJAM, Van Bergen F, De Jonghe JFM, et al. Applicability and validity of the Dutch version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-d) in diagnosing MCI. [Bruikbaarheid en validiteit van de Nederlandse versie van de Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-D) bij het diagnosticeren van Mild Cognitive Impairment.]. TIJDSCHR GERONTOLOGIE GER. 2010;41:231–240. doi: 10.1007/s12439-010-0218-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kal EC, Houdijk H, Van der Wurff P, et al. The inclination for conscious motor control after stroke: validating the movement-specific reinvestment scale for use in inpatient stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1097--1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleynen M, Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, et al. Investigating the Dutch movement-specific reinvestment scale in people with stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:160–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters RSW, Eves FF, Maxwell JP. Development of a Movement Specific Reinvestment Scale. In: Morris T, Terry P, Gordon S, et al., editors. Proceedings of the ISSP 11th World Congress of Sport Psychology; 2005; Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman BL, O’Connell RT. Linear statistical models: An applied approach. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Myers R. Classical and modern regression with applications. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Duxbury; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Durbin J, Watson GS. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression, II. Biometrika. 1951;30:159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, et al. KNGF-richtlijn beroerte. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Fysiotherapie Supplement. 2004;114:3–78. [English version: Available from: https://www.fysionet-evidencebased.nl/images/pdfs/guidelines_in_english/stroke_practice_guidelines_2014.pdf].
   Google Scholar
• Orrell AJ, Masters RSW, Eves FF. Reinvestment and movement disruption following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:177–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts PM, Posner MI. Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1967.
   Google Scholar