Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for persons with acquired brain injury and executive dysfunction

References

• Dutil E, Forget A, Vanier M, et al. Development of the ADL Profile. Occup Ther Health Care. 1990;7:7–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazaux J-M, Masson F, Levin HS, et al. Long-term neuropsychological outcome and loss of social autonomy after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1316–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintard B, Croze P, Mazaux JM, et al. Satisfaction de vie et devenir psychosocial des traumatisés crâniens graves en Aquitaine. Satisfaction of life and late psychosocial outcome after severe brain injury: a nine-year follow-up study in Aquitaine. Ann Réadapt Méd Phys. 2002;45:456–465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Demers L, Robichaud L, et al. Short-term changes in and predictors of participation of older adults after stroke following acute care or rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:288–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Vallat C, Azouvi P, Hardisson H, et al. Rehabilitation of verbal working memory after left hemisphere stroke. Brain Inj. 2005;19:1157–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD. Remediation of ‘working attention’ in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2002;16:185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Cramon DY, Cramon GM-v, Mai N. Problem-solving deficits in brain-injured patients: a therapeutic approach. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1991;1:45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Fasotti L, Kovacs F, Eling PATM, et al. Time pressure management as a compensatory strategy training after closed head injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2000;10:47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darrigrand B, Mazeaux J. Échelle de communication verballe de Bordeaux. Ortho-édition: Isbergues.
   Google Scholar
• Pyun S-B, Yang H, Lee S, et al. A home programme for patients with cognitive dysfunction: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2009;23:686–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semlyen JK, Summers SJ, Barnes MP. Traumatic brain injury: efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:678–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond MR. The stages of recovery from severe head injury with special reference to late outcome. Int Rehabil Med. 1979;1:155–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callahan CD, Barisa MT. Statistical process control and rehabilitation outcome: the single-subject design reconsidered. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdices M, Tate RL. Single-subject designs as a tool for evidence-based clinical practice: are they unrecognised and undervalued? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19:904–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankersley M, McGoey KE, Dalton D, et al. Single subject research methods in rehabilitation. Work. 2006;26:85–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhan S, Ottenbacher KJ. Single subject research designs for disability research. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass H. Boston diagnostic aphasia examination set: one each of all components. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. The problem of assessing executive functions. Int J Psychol. 1982;17:281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice T. Specific impairments of planning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B. 1982;298:199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice T. The allocation of processing resources: higher level control Neuropsychology to mental structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988. p. 328–352.
   Google Scholar
• Norman DA, Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. Center for human information processing (Technical report n°99). (Reprinted in revised form). In: Davidson RJ, Schwartz GE, Shapiro D, editors. Consciousness and self-regulation. Advances in research and theory. New York: Plenum Press; 1980. p. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Norman DA, Shallice T. Attention to action. In: Davidson RJ, Schwarts GE, Shapiro D, editors. Consciousness and self-regulation: advances in research and theory. New York: Plenum Press; 1986. p. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Klonoff PS, Lamb DG, Henderson SW, et al. Milieu-based neurorehabilitation at the Adult Day Hospital for Neurological Rehabilitation. International handbook of neuropsychological rehabilitation. New York: Springer; 2000. p. 195–213.
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Levin HS, Grafman J, et al. Neurobehavioral recovery from head injury.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT, Coelho C, Turkstra L, et al. Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18:257–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskins EC, Cicerone KD, Dams-O'Connor K, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation manual: translating evidence-based recommendations into practice. Reston, Virginia, USA: ACRM Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1596–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD. Evidence-based practice and the limits of rational rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1073–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:519–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1681–1692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevignard M, Pillon B, Pradat-Diehl P, et al. An ecological approach to planning dysfunction: script execution. Cortex. 2000;36:649–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevignard M, Taillefer C, Picq C, et al. Ecological assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome using execution of a cooking task. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18:461–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poncet F, Swaine B, Taillefer C, et al. Reliability of the Cooking Task in adults with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;25:298–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari C, Dassa C, Rainville C, et al. The criterion-related validity of the IADL Profile with measures of executive functions, indices of trauma severity and sociodemographic characteristics. Brain Inj. 2009;23:322–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Vincent C. The LIFE-H: assessment of the quality of social participation. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmens J, I S M van Engelen E, Post MW, et al. Reproducibility and validity of the Dutch Life Habits Questionnaire (LIFE-H 3.0) in older adults. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:853–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Maki BE, Williams JI, et al. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:1073–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83:S7–S11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiengkaew V, Jitaree K, Chaiyawat P. Minimal detectable changes of the Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, Timed "Up & Go" Test, gait speeds, and 2-minute walk test in individuals with chronic stroke with different degrees of ankle plantarflexor tone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1201–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newstead AH, Hinman MR, Tomberlin JA. Reliability of the Berg Balance Scale and balance master limits of stability tests for individuals with brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005;29:18–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdel Kafi S, Deboeck G. Question 3-7. Le test de marche de six minutes en réhabilitation respiratoire. Revue Maladies Respirat. 2005;22:54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Eng JJ, Dawson AS, Chu KS. Submaximal exercise in persons with stroke: test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with maximal oxygen consumption. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:113–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, et al. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberg KA. Reliability of a timed walk test in persons with acquired brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:385–390. Quiz 91–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Loo MA, Moseley AM, Bosman JM, et al. Test–re-test reliability of walking speed, step length and step width measurement after traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2004;18:1041–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Ferderman S. Box and Block Test of manual dexterity: norms for 6–19 year olds. Can J Occupat Therapy. Rev Can D'ergothérapie. 1985;52:241–246.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, et al. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39:386–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HM, Chen CC, Hsueh IP, et al. Test–retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:435–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery SA, Äsberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann P, Fimm B. Test d’Évaluation de l’Attention. TEA version 2.1 de la TAP. In. Test d’Évaluation de l’Attention. TEA version 2.1 de la TAP; 2009. Available from: http://www.psytest.net/
   Google Scholar
• Rey A. Mémorisation d’une série de 15 mots en 5 répétitions. In: EAP, editor. L’Examen Clinique en Psychologie. Paris, France: PUF; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Violon A, WC. La Ruche Test de perception et d’apprentissage Progressif en mémoire visuelle. Braine le Château, Belgique. l’Application des techniques Modernes.
   Google Scholar
• Parker RI, Vannest K. An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all Pairs. Behav Ther. 2009;40:357–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domholdt E. Physical therapy research: principles and applications. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ. Evaluating clinical change: strategies for occupational and physical therapists. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman JM, Leiblum SR. How to do psychotherapy and how to evaluate it: a manual for beginners. Saint Louis, MO: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schnitzler A, Woimant F, Tuppin P, et al. Prevalence of self-reported stroke and disability in the French adult population: a transversal study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham JE, Karmarkar AM, Ottenbacher KJ. Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: issues and methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:S111–S6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Executive function and motor performance. In: Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW, editors. Neuropsychological assessment. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004. p. 611–646.
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Godbee K, Sigmundsdottir L. A systematic review of assessment tools for adults used in traumatic brain injury research and their relationship to the ICF. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32:729–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson HE. A modified Card Sorting Test sensitive to frontal lobe defect. Cortex. 1976;12:313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden C. Stroop color and word test. Chicago (IL): Stoelting Company; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh T. Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19:203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R. Test des commissions. Editest; 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Cardebat D, Doyon B, Puel M, et al. Formal and semantic lexical evocation in normal subjects. Performance and dynamics of production as a function of sex, age and educational level. Acta Neurologica Belgica. 1989;90:207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegele B, Mazza S, Grenoble C. Test d’attention soutenue: PASAT modifié. Adaptation française. Marseille: Solal; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Echelle d’intelligence pour adultes. 3rd ed. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Wilson BA, et al. The dysexecutive questionnaire Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Bury St Edmunds (UK): Thames Valley Test Company; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale. 3rd ed. Paris: ECPA; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Echelle Clinique de Mémoire – 3ème édition. Paris: Les éditions du Centre de Psychologie (ECPA); 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Signoret J-L. Batterie d'efficience mnésique: BEM 144. Collection esprit et cerveau ed. Paris: Fondation IPSEN.: Elsevier; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ducarne de Ribaucourt B. Test pour l’examen de l’aphasie. Paris: Éditions du Centre de psychologie appliqué; 1989.
   Google Scholar