28,938
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Rehabilitation and Practice

Supporting successful inclusive practices for learners with disabilities in high schools: a multisite, mixed method collective case study

, , , , &
Pages 1708-1717 | Received 01 Aug 2016, Accepted 10 Mar 2017, Published online: 04 Apr 2017

References

  • United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child [Internet]. London: UNICEF; 1989 [cited 2015 Sep 5]. Available from: http://www.unicef.org.uk/Documents/Publication-pdfs/UNCRC_PRESS200910web.pdf
  • The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education [Internet]. Salamanca: UNESCO; 1994 [cited 2015 Sep 5]. Available from: http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/SALAMA_E.PDF
  • Ainscow M, César M. Inclusive education ten years after Salamanca: setting the agenda. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2006;21:231–238.
  • Allan J. Questions of inclusion in Scotland and Europe. Eur J Sp Needs Educ. 2010;25:199–208.
  • Riddell S. Education and disability/special needs, policies and practices in education, training and employment for students with disabilities and special educational needs in the EU. Brussels: NESSE Network; 2012.
  • Children and Families Directorate. Legal Act. Edinburgh: Children and Families Directorate; 2014.
  • Edwards TC. Quality of life of adolescents with perceived disabilities. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28:233–241.
  • Cole CM, Waldron N, Majd M. Academic progress of students across inclusive and traditional settings. Ment Retard. 2004;42:136–144.
  • Foreman P, Arthur-Kelly M, Pascoe S, et al. Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: An Australian perspective. Res prac pers severe dis. 2004;29:183–193.
  • Hunt P, Farron-Davis F, Beckstead S, et al. Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabil. 1994;19:200–214.
  • Westling DL, Fox LL. Teaching students with severe disabilities. 4th ed. United States: Prentice Hall; 2008.
  • Brown WH, Odom SL, Li S, et al. Ecobehavioral assessment in early childhood programs. J Spec Educ. 1999;33:138–153.
  • Buysse V, Goldman BD, Skinner ML. Setting effects on friendship formation among young children with and without disabilities. Except Child. 2002;68:503–517.
  • Rea P, Mclaughlin V, Walther-Thomas C. Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs. Except Child. 2002;68:203–223.
  • Kalambouka A, Farrell P, Dyson A, et al. The impact of placing pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools on the achievement of their peers. Educ Res. 2007;49:365–382.
  • Dyson A, Howes A, Roberts B. A systematic review of the effectiveness of school-level actions for promoting participation by all students (EPPI-Centre Review, version 1.1*). In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education; 2002.
  • Howes A, Farrell P, Kaplan I, et al. The impact of paid adult support on the participation and learning of pupils in mainstream schools. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPICentre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education; 2003.
  • Farrell P. The impact of research on developments in inclusive education. Int J Incl Educ. 2000;4:153–162.
  • Warnock M. Special educational needs: a new look. London: Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain; 2005.
  • Florian L, Black-Hawkins K. Exploring inclusive pedagogy. Brit Educ Res J. 2011;37:813–828.
  • Allan J. The inclusion challenge. In: Barow T, Ostlund D, editors. Bildning for alla: en pedagogisk utmaning Education for all: a pedagogical challenge. Kristianstad, Sweden: University Press; 2012. p. 109–120.
  • McMaster C. Ingredients for inclusion: lessons from the literature. Kairaranga. 2012;13:11–22.
  • Lehohla M, Hlalele D. Inclusive classrooms: an ecosystemic perspective. J Hum Ecol. 2012;37:189–201.
  • Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: theory and application (model of human occupation: theory & application). 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008.
  • World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health-version for children and youth (ICF-CY). Geneva: WHO; 2007.
  • Oliver M. The social model of disability: thirty years on. Disabil Soc. 2013;28:1024–1026.
  • Florian L. Preparing teachers to work in inclusive classrooms: key lessons for the professional development of teacher educators from Scotland’s inclusive practice project. J Teach Educ. 2012;63:275–285.
  • Florian L, Rouse M. The inclusive practice project in Scotland: teacher education for inclusive education. Teach Teach Educ. 2009;25:594–601.
  • Subban P, Sharma U. Primary school teachers’ perceptions of inclusive education in Victoria, Australia. Int J Sp Educ. 2006; 21:42–52.
  • Davies SMB, Howes AJ, Farrell P. Tensions and dilemmas as drivers for change in an analysis of joint working between teachers and educational psychologists. School Psychol Int. 2008;29:400–417.
  • Avramidis E, Norwich B. Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: a review of the literature. Eur J Sp Needs Educ. 2002;17:129–147.
  • Glazzard J. A critical interrogation of the contemporary discourses associated with inclusive education in England. J Res Sp Educ Needs. 2013;13:182–188.
  • Forlin C. Inclusion: identifying potential stressors for regular class teachers. Educ Res. 2001;43:235–245.
  • Hodkinson A. Conceptions and misconceptions of inclusive education – one year on: a critical analysis of newly qualified teachers’ knowledge and understanding of inclusion. Res Educ. 2006;76:43–55.
  • Byrnes M. Educators’ interpretations of ambiguous accommodations. Rem Sp Educ. 2008;29:306–315.
  • Kozik PL, Cooney B, Vinciguerra S, et al. Promoting inclusion in secondary schools through appreciative inquiry. Ame Second Educ. 2009;38:77–91.
  • Boyle C, Topping K, Jindal-Snape D. Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion in high schools. Teach Teach. 2013;19:527–542.
  • Boyle C, Topping K, Jindal-Snape D, et al. The importance of peer-support for teaching staff when including children with special educational needs. School Psychol Int. 2011;33:167–184.
  • Pratt B, Baker KW, Gaebler-Spira D. Participation of the child with cerebral palsy in the home, school, and community: a review of the literature. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2008;1:101–111.
  • Adair B, Ullenhag A, Keen D, et al. The effect of interventions aimed at improving participation outcomes for children with disabilities: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57:1093–1104.
  • Lindsay S. Child and youth experiences and perspectives of cerebral palsy: a qualitative systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. 2016;42:153–175.
  • National High School Alliance. A call to action. Transforming high school for all youth. Washington (DC): Institute of Educational Leadership; 2005.
  • Simpson RL, Peterson RL, Smith CR. Critical educational program components for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: science, policy, and practice. Rem Sp Educ. 2011;32:230–242.
  • Ruijs NM, Peetsma TTD. Effects of inclusion on students with and without special educational needs reviewed. Educ Res Rev. 2009;4:67–79.
  • Lindsay G. Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming. Br J Educ Psychol. 2007;77:1–24.
  • Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2009.
  • The City of Edinburgh Council. Secondary schools [Internet]. Edinburgh: The City of Edinburgh Council; c2010–2015 [cited 2010 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/secondaryschools
  • The Scottish Government. Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation [Internet]. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government; c2010–2016 [cited 2010 Aug 25]. Available from: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Statistics/SIMD
  • British Educational Research Association Ethical guidelines for educational research [Internet]. London: BERA; 2011 [cited 2015 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2011
  • Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theor Pract. 2000;39:124–130.
  • Morse JM, Field PA. Nursing research: the application of qualitative approaches. 2nd ed. Angleterre: Chapman & Hall; 1995.
  • NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 8.0. Victoria (Australia): QSR International Pty Ltd; 2008.
  • Borg G, Hunter MJ, Sigurjónsdottír B, et al. Key principles for promoting quality in inclusive education recommendations for practice. Brussels (Europe): European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education; 2011.
  • Ainscow M, Sandill A. Developing inclusive education systems: the role of organisational cultures and leadership. Int J Incl Educ. 2010;14:401–416.
  • Cobb C. Principals play many parts: a review of the research on school principals as special education leaders 2001–2011. Int J Incl Educ. 2015;19:213–234.
  • Schön DA editor. The reflective turn: case studies in and on educational practice. 2nd ed. New York: Teachers’ College Press; 1991.
  • Eraut M. Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. Brit J Educ Psychol. 2000;70:113–136.
  • Topping K, Maloney S, editors. Adapting curriculum and instruction. Abingdon: Routledge; 2005.
  • Avramidis E, Bayliss P, Burden R. A survey into mainstream teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educ Psychol. 2000;20:191–211.
  • Changpinit S, Greaves D, Frydenberg E. Attitudes, knowledge, concerns, and coping strategies regarding inclusive education in community of Thai educators. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Educational Reform; 2007 November 9–11; Maha Sarakham, Thailand.
  • Al-Zyoudi M. Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education in Jordanian schools. Int J Sp Educ. 2006;21:55–62.
  • Chong SC, Forlin C, Lan AM. The influence of an inclusive education course on attitude change of pre‐service secondary teachers in Hong Kong. Asia Pac J Teach Educ. 2007;35:161–179.
  • Gwernan-Jones R, Burden RL. Are they just lazy? Student teachers’ attitudes about dyslexia. Dyslexia. 2010;16:66–86.
  • Sharma U, Forlin C, Loreman T, et al. Pre-service teachers’ attitudes, concerns and sentiments about inclusive education: an international comparison of the novice pre-service teacher. Int J Sp Educ. 2006;21:80–93.
  • Taylor B, Jick H, MacLaughlin D. Prevalence and incidence rates of autism in the UK: time trend from 20042010 in children aged 8 years. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003219–e003219.
  • Polanczyk G. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:942
  • Law J, Rush R, Anandan C, et al. Predicting language change between 3 and 5 years and its implications for early identification. Pediatrics. 2012;130:X31.
  • Norwich B, Norwich PB. Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability: International perspectives and future directions. London: Taylor & Francis; 2007.
  • Skidmore D. Inclusion: the dynamic of school development. Buckingham (UK): Open University Press; 2004.
  • Slee R. ‘Inclusion in Practice’: does practice make perfect? Educ Rev. 2001;53:113–123.
  • Kirby A, Sugden DA. Children with developmental coordination disorders. J R Soc Med. 2007;100:182–186.
  • Thelen E. Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanal Dial. 2005;15:255–283.
  • Sands DJ, Kozleski EB, French BK. Inclusive education for the 21st century. Australia: Wadsworth; 2000.
  • Timperley H, Wilson A, Barrar H, Fung I. Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington (New Zealand): Ministry of Education; 2007.