2,945
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Unpacking community mobility: a preliminary study into the embodied experiences of stroke survivors

, , , &
Pages 2015-2024 | Received 28 Dec 2015, Accepted 21 Apr 2017, Published online: 17 May 2017

References

  • Craig LE, Wu O, Bernhardt J, et al. Predictors of poststroke mobility: systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2011;6:321–327.
  • Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party: National Clinical Guideline for Stroke. 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–1702.
  • Lord SE, Rochester L. Measurement of community ambulation after stroke: current status and future developments. Stroke. 2005;36:1457–1461.
  • Robinson CA, Matsuda PN, Ciol MA, et al. Participation in community walking following stroke: the influence of self-perceived environmental barriers. Phys Ther. 2013;93:620–627.
  • Nanninga CS, Meijering L, Schönherr MC, et al. Place attachment in stroke rehabilitation: a transdisciplinary encounter between cultural geography, environmental psychology and rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1125–1134.
  • Logan PA, Armstrong S, Avery TJ, et al. Rehabilitation aimed at improving outdoor mobility for people after stroke: a multicentre randomised controlled study (the Getting out of the House Study). Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:vii–viii.
  • Gardner P. The role of social engagement and identity in community mobility among older adults aging in place. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1249–1257.
  • Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, et al. Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:234–239.
  • van de Port IG, Kwakkel G, van Wijk I, et al. Susceptibility to deterioration of mobility long-term after stroke: a prospective cohort study. Stroke. 2006;37:167–171.
  • Rimmer JH, Wang E, Smith D. Barriers associated with exercise and community access for individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:315–322.
  • Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Tawashy AE. Exercise perceptions among people with stroke: barriers and facilitators to participation. Int J Therapy Rehab. 2011;18:520–530.
  • Gordon NF, Gulanick M, Costa F, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Circulation. 2004;109:2031–2041.
  • Yong V. Mobility limitations. In: JH Stone, M Blouin, editors. International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation. New York (USA): the Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange (CIRRIE); 2010. Available from: http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/en/article/259/.
  • Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;22:CD001920.
  • Barclay RE, Stevenson TJ, Poluha W, et al. Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;13:CD010200.
  • Stretton CM, Mudge S, Kayes NM, et al. Interventions to improve real-world walking after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016;31:310–318.
  • Robinson CA, Shumway-Cook A, Ciol MA, et al. Participation in community walking following stroke: subjective versus objective measures and the impact of personal factors. Phys Ther. 2011;91:1865–1876.
  • Elbers RG, Rietberg MB, van Wegen EE, et al. Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:925–944.
  • Pols J. Knowing patients: turning patient knowledge into science. Sci Technol Human Values. 2014;39:73–97.
  • Mol A, Moser I, Pols J, editors. Care in practice: on tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Bielefeld: Verlag; 2010.
  • Mol A. The logic of care. Health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge; 2008.
  • Sheller M, Urry J. The new mobilities paradigm. Environ Plan A. 2006;38:207–226.
  • Cresswell T. Mobilities I: catching up. Prog Hum Geogr. 2011;35:550–558.
  • Cresswell T. Mobilities II: still. Prog Hum Geogr. 2012;36:645–653.
  • Ziegler F, Schwanen T. ‘I like to go out to be energised by different people’: an exploratory analysis of mobility and well-being in later life. Ageing Soc. 2011;31:758–781.
  • Schwanen T, Ziegler F. Wellbeing, independence and mobility: an introduction. Ageing Soc. 2011;31:719–733.
  • Schwanen T, Hardill I, Lucas S. Spatialities of ageing: the co-construction and co-evolution of old age and space. Geoforum. 2012;43:1291–1295.
  • Gregory D, Johnston R, Pratt G, et al. The dictionary of human geography. 5th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
  • Struhkamp R, Mol A, Swierstra T. Dealing with in/dependence: doctoring in physical rehabilitation practice. Sci Technol Human Values. 2009;34:55–76.
  • Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organized inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD000197.
  • Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A. Qualitative research methods. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications; 2011.
  • Thornberg R. Informed grounded theory. Scand J Educ Res. 2012;56:243–259.
  • Muhr T, Friese S. User’s Manual for Atlas.ti 5.0. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Scientific Software Development; 2004.
  • Walsch K. When I say…triangulation. Med Educ. 2013;47:866.
  • Kirkevold M, Christensen D, Andersen G, et al. Fatigue after stroke: manifestations and strategies. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:665–670.
  • Flinn NA, Stube JE. Post-stroke fatigue: qualitative study of three focus groups. Occup Ther Int. 2010;17:81–91.
  • Winance M. Care and disability. Practices of experimenting, tinkering with, and arranging people and technical aids. In: Care in practice: on tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Bielefeld: Verlag; 2010. p. 93–117.
  • Carlsson GE, Möller A, Blomstrand C. Managing an everyday life of uncertainty – a qualitative study of coping in persons with mild stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:773–782.
  • Haley WE, Roth DL, Kissela B, et al. Quality of life after stroke: a prospective longitudinal study. Qual Life Res. 2011;20:799–806.
  • Salter K, Hellings C, Foley N, et al. The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:595–602.
  • Andrew NE, Kilkenny MF, Naylor R, et al. The relationship between caregiver impacts and the unmet needs of survivors of stroke. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:1065–1073.
  • Greenwood N, Mackenzie A. Informal caring for stroke survivors: meta-ethnographic review of qualitative literature. Maturitas. 2010;66:268–276.
  • Gallacher K, Morrison D, Jani B, et al. Uncovering treatment burden as a key concept for stroke care: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001473.
  • Van Heugten C, Visser-Meily A, Post M, et al. Care for carers of stroke patients: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38:153–158.
  • Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:35.
  • O’Reilly M, Parker N. “Unsatisfactory saturation”: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2013;13:190–197.
  • Carpiano RM. Come take a walk with me: the ‘go-along’ interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health Place. 2009;15:263–272.
  • Lager D, Hoven BV, Huigen PPP. Understanding older adults’ social capital in place: obstacles to and opportunities for social contacts in the neighbourhood. Geoforum. 2015;59:87–97.
  • Evans J, Jones P. The walking interview: methodology, mobility and place. Appl Geogr. 2011;31:849–858.
  • Mol A. Proving or improving: on health care research as a form of self-reflection. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:405–414.
  • Chitralakshimi K, Balasubramanian CK, Clark DJ, et al. Walking adaptability after a stroke and its assessment in clinical settings. Stroke Res Treat. 2014;2014:591013.
  • Rand D, Eng JJ, Tang PF, et al. How active are people with stroke?: use of accelerometers to assess physical activity. Stroke. 2009;40:163–168.
  • Eng JJ, Chu KS, Dawson AS, et al. Functional walk tests in individuals with stroke: relation to perceived exertion and myocardial exertion. Stroke. 2002;33:756–761.
  • Hirsch JA, Winters M, Clarke P, et al. Generating GPS activity spaces that shed light upon the mobility habits of older adults: a descriptive analysis. Int J Health Geogr. 2014;13:1–14.