Negative impact of litigation procedures on patient outcomes four years after severe traumatic brain injury: results from the PariS-traumatic brain injury study

References

• Ponsford J. Factors contributing to outcome following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32:803–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan C, Bayen E, Bahrami S, et al. Loss to follow-up and social background in an inception cohort of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: results from the PariS-TBI Study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31:E42–E48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearing NM, Connelly LB. Is compensation “bad for health? A systematic meta-review”?. Injury. 2011;42:15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy JD, Bendix T, Rasmussen C, et al. Re: spearing and connelly. Is compensation bad for your health? A systematic meta-review. Injury. 2011;42:15–24. Injury. 2011;42:428–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham-Hill S, Elder K. Civil litigation 2015–2016, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant B, Mayou R, Lloyd-Bostock S. Compensation claims following road accidents: a six-year follow-up study. Med Sci Law. 1997;37:326–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton SM, Hughes DC, Poustie SJ, et al. The influence of fault on health in the immediate post-crash period following road traffic crashes. Injury. 2012;43:1586–1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulemeijer M, Andriessen TM, Brauer JM, et al. Cognitive performance after mild traumatic brain injury: the impact of poor effort on test results and its relation to distress, personality and litigation. Brain Inj. 2007;21:309–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay E, Donders J. Risk factors for depressive symptoms after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2008; 22:233–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristman VL, Borg J, Godbolt AK, et al. Methodological issues and research recommendations for prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:S265–S277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reynolds S, Paniak C, Toller-Lobe G, et al. A longitudinal study of compensation-seeking and return to work in a treated mild traumatic brain injury sample. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18:139–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinlay WW, Brooks DN, Bond MR. Post-concussional symptoms, financial compensation and outcome of severe blunt head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1983;46:1084–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL, Rutterford NA. The effect of litigation on long term cognitive and psychosocial outcome after severe brain injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;21:239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaafsma FG, Middleton J, De Wolf AC, et al. The association of compensation and long-term health status for people with severe traumatic injuries. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:446–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington R, Foster M, Fleming J. Experiences of pathways, outcomes and choice after severe traumatic brain injury under no-fault versus fault-based motor accident insurance. Brain Inj. 2015;29:1561–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghababian V, Berland Benhaim C, Bartoli C, et al. The Dintilhac report and its implications for forensic neuropsychological evaluation. Encephale. 2010;36:139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministère de la Justice. 2012. Available from: http://www.vos-droits.justice.gouv.fr/indemnisation-du-prejudice-11940/indemnisation-par-le-tribunal-11949/la-commission-dindemnisation-des-victimes-dinfraction-20242.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bayen E, Pradat-Diehl P, Jourdan C, et al. Predictors of informal care burden 1 year after a severe traumatic brain injury: results from the PariS-TBI study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28:408–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayen E, Jourdan C, Ghout I, et al. Objective and subjective burden of informal caregivers 4 years after a severe traumatic brain injury: results from the PariS-TBI study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31:E59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan C, Bayen E, Bosserelle V, et al. Referral to rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: results from the PariS-TBI Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:35–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan C, Bosserelle V, Azerad S, et al. Predictive factors for 1-year outcome of a cohort of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): results from the PariS-TBI study. Brain Inj. 2013;27:1000–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi P, Vallat-Azouvi C, Millox V, et al. Ecological validity of the dysexecutive questionnaire: results from the PariS-TBI study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;25:864–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan C, Bayen E, Pradat-Diehl P, et al. A comprehensive picture of 4-year outcome of severe brain injuries. Results from the PariS-TBI study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;59:100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan C, Bayen E, Darnoux E, et al. Patterns of post-acute health care utilization after a severe traumatic brain injury: Results from the PariS-TBI cohort. Brain Inj. 2015;29:701–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr, et al. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14:187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, et al. Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery. 1979;4:283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:573–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanier M, Mazaux JM, Lambert J, et al. Assessment of neuropsychologic impairments after head injury: interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:796–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell JH, Beckers K, Greenwood RJ. Measuring progress and outcome in community rehabilitation after brain injury with a new assessment instrument-the BICRO-39 scales. Brain injury community rehabilitation outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1213–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Steinbuchel N, Wilson L, Gibbons H, et al. Quality of life after brain injury (QOLIBRI): scale validity and correlates of quality of life. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:1157–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond FM, Grattan KD, Sasser H, et al. Five years after traumatic brain injury: a study of individual outcomes and predictors of change in function. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19:25–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemse-van Son AH, Ribbers GM, Verhagen AP, et al. Prognostic factors of long-term functioning and productivity after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:1024–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter PB. Employment and litigation: improved by work, assisted by verdict. Pain. 2002;100:249–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearing NM, Gyrd-Hansen D, Pobereskin LH, et al. Are people who claim compensation “cured by a verdict”? A longitudinal study of health outcomes after whiplash. J Law Med. 2012;20:82–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cameron P, Gabbe B. The effect of compensation claims on outcomes after injury. Injury. 2009;40:905–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell ML, Creamer MC, McFarlane AC, et al. Does access to compensation have an impact on recovery outcomes after injury? Med J Aust. 2010;192:328–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder LM, Rohling ML. Money matters: a meta-analytic review of the effects of financial incentives on recovery after closed-head injury. Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:7–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron ID, Rebbeck T, Sindhusake D, et al. Legislative change is associated with improved health status in people with whiplash. Spine. 2008;33:250–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Cote P, et al. Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1179–1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottingham ME, Victor TL, Boone KB, et al. Apparent effect of type of compensation seeking (disability versus litigation) on performance validity test scores may be due to other factors. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28:1030–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller H. Accident neurosis. Brain Inj. 1992;6:401–410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levy A. Compensation neurosis rides again. Brain Inj. 1992;6:401–410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall RC. Compensation neurosis: a too quickly forgotten concept?. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40:390–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee GJ. Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: relationship to likelihood ratios. Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;22:666–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet JJ, Goldman DJ, Guidotti Breting LM. Traumatic brain injury: guidance in a forensic context from outcome, dose-response, and response bias research. Behav Sci Law. 2013;31:756–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant GM, O'Donnell ML, Spittal MJ, et al. Relationship between stressfulness of claiming for injury compensation and long-term recovery: a prospective cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:446–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murgatroyd DF, Cameron ID, Harris IA. Understanding the effect of compensation on recovery from severe motor vehicle crash injuries: a qualitative study. Inj Prev. 2011;17:222–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar