Nominal group technique for individuals with cognitive disability: a systematic review

References

• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. 2006. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Muenchberger H, Ehrlich C, Kendall E, et al. Experience of place for young adults under 65 years with complex disabilities moving into purpose-built residential care. Social Science & Medicine. 2012;75:2151–2159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkes MA, Brown M, Horsburgh D. Self-directed support policy: challenges and possible solutions. Br J Learn Disabil. 2012;42:169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parliament of Australia. National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013. Parliament of Australia; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Parliament. Social Care (Self-Directed Support) (Scotland) Act 2013. Scottish Parliament, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• National Health Service England. The National Health Service (Direct Payments) Amendment Regulations 2013. National Health Service England, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Braddock D, Rizzolo MC, Thompson M, et al. Emerging technologies and cognitive disability. J Special Educ Technol. 2004;19:49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Shogren K, Verdugo MA, et al. Cognitive impairment and intellectual disability. Adv Special Educ. 2014;27:55–89.
   Google Scholar
• Dew A, Bulkeley K, Veitch C, et al. Carer and service providers’ experiences of individual funding models for children with a disability in rural and remote areas. Health Soc Care Community. 2013;21:432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkes MA, Brown M, Horsburgh D. Self-directed support and people with learning disabilities: a review of the published research evidence. Br J Learn Disabil. 2014;42:87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross JMS, Wallace L, Blue-Banning M, et al. Examining the experiences and decisions of parents/guardians: participant directing the supports and services of adults with significant intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2013;24:88–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell W. Parents’ accounts: factors considered when deciding how far to involve their son/daughter with learning disabilities in choice-making. Children Youth Serv Rev. 2012;34:1560–1569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell F. Self-directed support and disabled young people in transition (part 2). J Integrated Care. 2012;20:223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Porter J. Methodological issues in collecting children’s view part 2: using nominal group technique to explore children’s views of the difficulties encountered in school. Cyprus International Conference on Educational Research (Cy-Icer-2012). Procedia. 2012;47:1627–1631.
   Google Scholar
• Porter J. Be careful how you ask! Using focus groups and nominal group technique to explore the barriers to learning. Int J Res Method Educ. 2013;36:33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrill JA, Sibbald B, Buetow S. The Delphi and nominal group techniques in health services research. Int J Pharm Pract. 1996;4:67–74.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan SS, Kelly F, Sav A, et al. Using the nominal group technique: how to analyse across multiple groups. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method. 2014;14:92–108.
   Google Scholar
• Tuffrey-Wijne I, Bernal J, Butler G, et al. Using nominal group technique to investigate the views of people with intellectual disabilities on end-of-life care provision. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58:80–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeden JM, Maaskant MA, Curfs LMG. The views of clients with mild intellectual disabilities regarding their working relationships with caregivers. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2011;24:398–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters T, EndNote X7. Philadelphia (PA): Thomson Reuters; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49:47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, et al. Proposal: a mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. 2011. Available from: http://www.webcitation.org/5tTRTc9yJ
   Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkema N, de Veer AJE, Hertogh CMPM, et al. Perspectives of people with mild intellectual disabilities on care relationships at the end of life: a group interview study. Palliat Med. 2016;30:625–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia LJ, Barrette J, Laroche C. Perceptions of the obstacles to work reintegration for persons with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2000;14:269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley J, Boyle E, Lombard D, et al. Towards a consumer-informed research agenda for aphasia: preliminary work. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1042–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen A, Arnold K, Friedman C, et al. Nominal group technique: an accessible and interactive method for conceptualizing the sexual self-advocacy of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Qual Soc Work. 2016;15:175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman C, Arnold CK, Owen AL, et al. “Remember our voices are our tools:” Sexual self-advocacy as defined by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Sex Disabil. 2014;32:515–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spassiani NA, Sawyer AR, Abou Chacra MS, et al. Teaches people that I’m more than a disability: using nominal group technique in patient-oriented research for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016;54:112–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, et al. Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:1364–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore CM. Group techniques for idea building. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:1–88.
   Google Scholar
• Tuffrey-Wijne I, McEnhill L. Communication difficulties and intellectual disability in end-of-life care. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2008;14:189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cameron L, Murphy J. Obtaining consent to participate in research: the issues involved in including people with a range of learning and communication disabilities. Br J Learning Disab. 2007;35:113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay WML, Antaki C, Walton C, et al. The dilemma for staff in ‘playing a game’ with a person with profound intellectual disabilities: empowerment, inclusion and competence in interactional practice. Soc Health Illness. 2008;30:531–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin AM, O’Connor-Fenelon M, Lyons R. Non-verbal communication between nurses and people with an intellectual disability: a review of the literature. J Intellect Disabil. 2010;14:303–314.
   Google Scholar
• Antonsson H, Åström S, Lundström M, et al. Skilled interaction among professional carers in special accommodations for adult people with learning disabilities. J Psychiatr Mental Health Nurs. 2013;20:576–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy D, Walsh PN. Communication among nurses and adults with severe and profound intellectual disabilities: predicted and observed strategies. J Intellect Disabil. 2007;11:127–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin AM, Connor-Fenelon MO, Lyons R. Non-verbal communication between registered nurses intellectual disability and people with an intellectual disability: an exploratory study of the nurse’s experiences. Part 1. J Intellect Disabil. 2012;16:61–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin AM, Connor-Fenelon MO, Lyons R. Non-verbal communication between Registered Nurses Intellectual Disability and people with an intellectual disability: an exploratory study of the nurse’s experiences. Part 2. J Intellect Disabil. 2012;16:97–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar