618
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Examining occupational health and safety vulnerability among Canadian workers with disabilities

, , &
Pages 2138-2143 | Received 11 Aug 2016, Accepted 04 May 2017, Published online: 26 May 2017

References

  • World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva: WHO Press; 2011.
  • Statistics Canada. Table 115-0005 – Labour force status for adults with and without disabilities, by sex and age group, Canada, provinces and territories [Internet]. 2014. [cited 2016 Apr 18]. Available from: http://www5statcangcca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&retrLang=eng&id=1150005&pattern=disability+employment&tabMode=dataTable&srchLan=-1&p1=1&p2=-1
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2010.
  • Mitra S. The recent decline in the employment of persons with disabilities in South Africa, 1998-2006. S. Afr J Econ. 2008;76:480–492.
  • Canadian Human Rights Commission. Report on equality rights of people with disabilities. [Cat. No. HR4-20/2012E-PDF]. Ottawa: Ministry of Public Works and Government Services; 2012.
  • Domzal C, Houtenville A, Sharma R. Survey of employer perspectives on the employment of people with disabilities. McLean (VA): CESSI; 2008. (Technical Report).
  • Lay AM, Saunders R, Lifshen M, et al. Individual, occupational, and workplace correlates of occupational health and safety vulnerability in a sample of Canadian workers. Am J Ind Med. 2016;59:119–128.
  • Smith PM, Saunders R, Lifshen M, et al. The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;82:234–243.
  • Quinn G, Degener T, Bruce A, et al. Human rights and disability: the current use and future potential of United Nations human rights instruments in the context of disability. New York, Geneva: United Nations; 2002.
  • Steinfeld E, Maisel J. Universal design: creating inclusive environments. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
  • European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Worker participation in occupational safety and health: a practical guide. Bilbao, Spain: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2012.
  • Perlman A, Sacks R, Barak R. Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction. Saf Sci. 2014;64:22–31.
  • Ministry of Labour. Ministry of Labour; 2010. Expert Advisory Panel on occupational health and safety. Report and recommendations to the Ontario Minister of Labour[Internet]; [cited 2016 Apr 18]. Available from: http://wwwlabourgovonca/english/hs/prevention/report/serial online.
  • Breslin FC, Pole JD. Work injury risk among young people with learning disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Canada. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1423–1430.
  • Schur LA. Barriers or opportunities? The causes of contingent and part-time work among people with disabilities. Ind Relat. 2003;42:589–622.
  • Statistics Canada. A guide to the labour force survey (71-543-G, 1-71). Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada; 2012.
  • Jetha A, Pransky G, Hettinger L. Capturing complexity in work disability research: application of system dynamics modeling methodology. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:189–194.
  • Gold P, Oire S, Fabian E, et al. Negotiating reasonable workplace accommodations: perspective of employers, employees with disabilities, and rehabilitation service providers. J Vocat Rehabil. 2012;37:25–37.
  • Madaus J, Gerber P, Price L. Adults with learning disabilities in the workforce: lessons for secondary transition programs. Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2008;23:148–153.
  • Gignac MAM, Cao X, McAlpine J. Availability, need for, and use of work accommodations and benefits: are they related to employment outcomes in people with arthritis? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67:855–864.
  • Agrilla JA. Construction safety management formula for success. In: Singh A, Hinze J, Coble R, editors. Implementation of safety and health on construction sites. Rotterdam: AA Balkema; 1999.
  • Rothman KJ, Gallacher JE, Hatch EE. Why representativeness should be avoided. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1012–1014.
  • Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G. Commentary: should we always deliberately be non-representative? Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1022–1026.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.