Prospective memory rehabilitation using smartphones in patients with TBI

References

• Shum D, Levin H, Chan RCK. Prospective memory in patients with closed head injury: a review. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49:2156–2165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis J. Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intensions: a conceptual framework for research. In: Brandimonte M, Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, editors. Prospective memory: theory and applications. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Cappa SF, Benke T, Clarke S, et al. EFNS Guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS Task Force. Eur J Neurol. 2003;10:11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappa SF, Benke T, Clarke S, et al. EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12:665–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1596–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1681–1692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:519–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohling ML, Faust ME, Beverly B, et al. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.’s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. Neuropsychology. 2009;23:20–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson M, Cullen B, McGee-Lennon M, et al. The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24:419–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Evans JJ, Emslie H, et al. Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1997;63:113–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Emslie HC, Quirk K, et al. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70:477–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Emslie H, Quirk K, et al. A randomized control trial to evaluate a paging system for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2005;19:891–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek MD, Downes J, Johnson Z, et al. Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. Brain Inj. 2000;14:455–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda K, Misu T, Beckman B, et al. Use of an IC Recorder as a voice output memory aid for patients with prospective memory impairment. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2002;12:155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Hawkey K, Whyte J. Use of a portable voice organizer to remember therapy goals in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a within-subjects trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17:556–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade TK, Troy JC. Mobile phones as a new memory aid: a preliminary investigation using case studies. Brain Inj. 2001;15:305–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton S, Adams M, Atterton L. A mobile phone as a memory aid for individuals with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary investigation. Brain Inj. 2007;21:401–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pompei R, Gillette Y, Goetz E, et al. Practical applications for use of PDAs and smartphones with children and adolescents who have traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2008;23:487–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry T, Wallace J, Kvarfordt C, et al. Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: a community-based trial. Brain Inj. 2008;22:19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry T. PDAs as cognitive aids for people with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther. 2008;62:18–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright P, Rogers N, Hall C, et al. Comparison of pocket-computer memory aids for people with brain injury. Brain Inj. 2001;15:787–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright P, Rogers N, Hall C, et al. Enhancing an appointment diary on a pocket computer for use by people after brain injury. Int J Rehabil Res. 2001;24:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Burke DT, Dowds MM, et al. Utility of a microcomputer as an external memory aid for a memory-impaired head injury patient during in-patient rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 1999;13:147–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Burke DT, Dowds MM Jr, et al. Electronic memory aids for outpatient brain injury: follow-up findings. Brain Inj. 2000;14:187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillette Y, De Pompei R. The potential of electronic organizers as a tool in the cognitive rehabilitation of young people. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19:233–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillette Y, De Pompei R. Do PDAs enhance the organization and memory skills of students with cognitive disabilities? Psychol Schs. 2008;45:665–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Joode EA, Van Heugten CM, Verhey FRJ, et al. Effectiveness of an electronic cognitive aid in patients with acquired brain injury: a multicentre randomised parallel-group study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;23:133–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron B, Grimson J, Carton S, et al. Effectiveness of an unmodified personal digital assistant as a compensatory strategy for prospective memory failures in adults with an ABI. Irish J Psychol. 2012;33:29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Svoboda E, Richards B. Compensating for anterograde amnesia: a new training method that capitalizes on emerging smartphone technologies. J Inter Neuropsych Soc. 2009;15:629–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda E, Richards B, Polsinelli A, et al. A theory-driven training programme in the use of emerging commercial technology: application to an adolescent with severe memory impairment. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20:562–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda E, Richards B, Leach L, et al. PDA and smartphone use by individuals with moderate-to-severe memory impairment: application of a theory-driven training programme. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22:408–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson S, Friedland D, Woodberry E. Smartphone technology: gentle reminders of everyday tasks for those with prospective memory difficulties post-brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29:583–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald A, Haslam C, Yates P, et al. Google Calendar: a new memory aid to compensate for prospective memory deficits following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21:784–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowds MM, Lee PH, Sheer JB, et al. Electronic reminding technology following traumatic brain injury: effects on timely task completion. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011;26:339–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson HE, O’Connell A. Dementia: the estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the New Adult Reading Test. Cortex. 1978;14:234–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey A. L’examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France; 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers JE, Meyers KR. Rey complex figure test and recognition trial: professional manual. Odessa (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor LB. Localisation of cerebral lesions by psychological testing. Clin Neurosurg. 1969;16:269–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Spreen O, Benton AL. Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia (NCCEA). Victoria (BC): University of Victoria, Neuropsychology Laboratory; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Smith A. Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Golden CJ. Stroop Color and Word Test: a manual for clinical and experimental users. Chicago, IL: Stoelting Co.; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Golden CJ, Freshwater SM. Stroop Color and Word Test: revised examiner’s manual. Wood Dale, IL: Stoetling Co.; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson WC, Zillmer EA. Tower of London: Drexel University (TOL_DX). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gade A, Mortensen EL. The influence of age, education and intelligence on neuropsychological test performance. Psykologisk Tidsskriftsserie, Århus. 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen K. Selskabet-Danske-Neuropsykologer. Danske normer til neuropsykologiske tests. 1. udgave ed. Kbh.: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag; 2012. dan.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen H, Knudsen L, Daugbjerg O. Normative data for eight neuropsychological tests based on a Danish sample. Scand J Psychol. 1989;30:37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttl B, Kibreab M. Self-report measures of prospective memory are reliable but not valid. Can J Exp Psychol. 2011;65:57–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon R, Adams P, Harrington S, et al. Effects of brain injury and age on prospective memory self-rating and performance. Rehabil Psychol. 1995;40:289–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G, Della Sala S, Logie RH, et al. Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: a questionnaire study. Memory. 2000;8:311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, et al. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br J Clin Psychol. 1982;21(Pt. 1):1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale TW, Christensen AL, Willmes K, et al. Subjective experience in brain-injured patients and their close relatives: a European Brain Injury Questionnaire study. Brain Inj. 1997;11:543–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF). Introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment: field trial version, december 1996. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundhedsstyrelsen. Hjerneskaderehabilitering – en medicinsk teknologivurdering; hovedrapport. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Evald L. Prospective memory rehabilitation using smartphones in patients with TBI: what do participants report? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;25:283–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar