Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with neck disorders: a systematic review of the literature

References

• McBeth J, Jones K. Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21:403–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picavet HSJ, Schouten JSAG. Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC3-study. Pain. 2003;102:167–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SBU. Methods for long term pain treatment. Stockholm: The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• IMMPACT. Initiative on methods, measurement, and pain assessment in clinical trials 2009; [cited 2009 Jan 22]. Available from: http://www.immpact.org/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Wiitavaara B, Björklund M, Brulin C, et al. How well do questionnaires on symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders capture the experiences of those who suffer from the disorders? A content analysis of questionnaires and interviews. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994;23:129–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain. 1985;23:345–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström KG, Jensen IB, Linton SJ, et al. A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-S): a gender differentiated evaluation. Eur J Pain (London, UK). 1999;3:261–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Short version [Internet]; 2001. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inform Libr J. 2009;26:91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink A. Conducting research literature reviews. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Inc.; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22:1435–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:331–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, et al. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:659–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenDebba M, Heller J, Ducker TB, et al. Cervical spine outcomes questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties. Spine. 2002;27:2116–2123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan A, Manniche C, Mosdal C, et al. The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulat Physiol Ther. 1998;21:520–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton JE, Humphreys BK. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients. J Manipulat Physiol Ther. 2002;25:141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulat Physiol Ther. 1991;14:409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler AH, Goolkasian P, Baird AC, et al. Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity. Spine. 1999;24:1290–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard JH, Choo CP, Manaf MR, et al. Development and evaluation of ‘neck pain and functional limitation scale’: a validation study in the Asian context. Indian J Med Sci. 2009;63:445–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang YC, Cook KF, Deutscher D, et al. The Development and Psychometric Properties of the Patient Self-Report Neck Functional Status Questionnaire (NFSQ). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45:683–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juul T, Sogaard K, Roos EM, et al. Development of a patient-reported outcome: the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS)–Content and construct validity. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:844–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leak AM, Cooper J, Dyer S, et al. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, devised to measure neck pain and disability. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33:469–474.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjorklund M, Hamberg J, Heiden M, et al. The ProFitMap-neck–reliability and validity of a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1096–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolasky RL, Riley LH, Albert TJ. Psychometric properties of the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire and its relationship to standard assessment tools used in spine research. Spine J. 2007;7:174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolasky RL, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, et al. Patient satisfaction in the cervical spine research society outcomes study: relationship to improved clinical outcome. Spine J. 2009;9:232–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering PM, Osmotherly PG, Attia JR, et al. An examination of outcome measures for pain and dysfunction in the cervical spine: a factor analysis. Spine. 2011;36:581–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay RE, Madson TJ, Cieslak KR. Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. J Manipulat Physiol Ther. 2007;30:259–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geri T, Piscitelli D, Meroni R, et al. Rasch analysis of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire to measure disability related to chronic neck pain. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:836–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton JE. Sensitivity and specificity of outcome measures in patients with neck pain: detecting clinically significant improvement. Spine. 2004;29:2410–2417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst H, Bolton J. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulat Physiol Ther. 2004;27:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hains F, Waalen J, Mior S. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index. J Manipulat Physiol Ther. 1998;21:75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy MJH, Grevitt MP, Silcocks P, et al. The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index, and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:2111–2117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Velde G, Beaton D, Hogg-Johnston S, et al. Rasch analysis provides new insights into the measurement properties of the neck disability index. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:544–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung M, Cheng C, Hon SD, et al. Challenging the norm: further psychometric investigation of the neck disability index. Spine J. 2015;15:2440–2445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, et al. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2006;31:598–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Childs JA, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, et al. Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J. 2009;9:802–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young IA, Cleland JA, Michener LA, et al. Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil/Assoc Acad Physiatr. 2010;89:831–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddle DL, Stratford PW. Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Phys Ther. 1998;78:951–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• En MCC, Clair DA, Edmondston SJ. Validity of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale for measuring disability associated with chronic, non-traumatic neck pain. Manual Ther. 2009;14:433–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Osborne JW, et al. Confirmatory factory analysis of the Neck Disability Index in a general problematic neck population indicates a one-factor model. Spine J. 2014;14:1410–1416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juul T, Sogaard K, Davis AM, et al. Psychometric properties of the Neck OutcOme Score, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form-36 were evaluated in patients with neck pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;79:31–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goolkasian P, Wheeler AH, Gretz SS. The neck pain and disability scale: test–retest reliability and construct validity. Clin J Pain. 2002;18:245–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J, Jordan K, Lewis M, et al. Sensitivity to change and internal consistency of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and derivation of a minimal clinically important difference. Clin J Pain. 2006;22:820–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorklund M, Wiitavaara B, Heiden M. Responsiveness and minimal important change for the ProFitMap-neck questionnaire and the Neck Disability Index in women with neck-shoulder pain. Qual Life Res. 2016;26:161–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oner FC, Jacobs WC, Lehr AM, et al. Toward the development of a universal outcome instrument for spine trauma: a systematic review and content comparison of outcome measures used in spine trauma research using the ICF as reference. Spine. 2016;41:358–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotle M, Brox JI, VNK. Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine. 2005;30:130–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibsen CS, Christensen B, Melchiorsen H, et al. Do patient-reported outcome measures describe functioning in patients with low back pain, using the brief international classification of functioning, disability and health core set as a reference? J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:618–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira ML, Borges BM, Rezende IL, et al. Are neck pain scales and questionnaires compatible with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:1539–1546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiitavaara B, Fahlstrom M, Djupsjobacka M. Prevalence, diagnostics and management of musculoskeletal disorders in primary health care in Sweden: an investigation of 2000 randomly selected patient records. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;23:325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy E, Davidson M, Benjamin D, et al. Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaires for people with pain in any spine region. A systematic review. Manual Ther. 2016;22:22–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Gibbons E, et al. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar