“I just had to be flexible and show good patience”: management of interactional approaches to enact mentoring roles by peer mentors with developmental disabilities

References

• Bobroff S, Sax CL. The effects of peer tutoring interview skills training with transition-age youth with disabilities. J Vocat Rehab. 2010;33:143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbert D, Kostinas G, Luiselli JK. Improving skills performance of an adult with mental retardation through peer-mediated instructional support. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2002;14:119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay S, Hartman L, Fellin M. A systematic review of mentorship programs to facilitate transition to post-secondary education and employment for youth and young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehab. 2016;38:1329–1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumbo NJ, Lindahl-Lewis P, Blegen AR. Two mentorship case studies of high school and university students with disabilities: milestones and lessons. J Rehab. 2008;74:45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karcher MJ, Kuperminc GP, Portwood SG, et al. Mentoring programs: A framework to inform program development, research, and evaluation. J Commun Psychol. 2006;34:709–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcazar FE, Kelly EH, Keys CB, et al. Using peer mentoring to support the rehabilitation of individuals with violently acquired spinal cord injuries. J Appl Rehab Counsel. 2011;42:3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Balcazar FE, Keys CB. Goals in mentoring relationships. In DuBois DL, Karcher MJ, editors. Handbook of youth mentoring. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2014. p.83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch NL, Spencer R. Capturing the magic: assessing the quality of youth mentoring relationships. New Dir Youth Dev. 2009;2009:47–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karcher MJ, Nakkula MJ. Youth mentoring with a balanced focus, shared purpose, and collaborative interactions. New Dir Youth Dev. 2010;2010:13–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spencer R. A working model of mentors’ contributions to youth mentoring relationship quality: insights from research on psychotherapy. Learn Landsc. 2012;5:295–312.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle BJ. Recent developments in role theory. Annu Rev Sociol. 1986;12:67–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting B, Dye B, Pinnegar S, et al. Understanding the dynamics of peer mentor learning: A narrative study. J First-Year Exp Stud Trans. 2012;24:61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ward EG, Thomas EE, Disch WB. Mentor service themes emergent in a holistic, undergraduate peer-mentoring experience. J College Stud Dev. 2014;55:563–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karcher MJ. Cross-age peer mentoring. In DuBois DL, Karcher MJ, editors. Handbook of youth mentoring. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2014. p.223–258.
   Google Scholar
• Bedell G, Coster W, Law M, et al. Community participation, supports, and barriers of school-age children with and without disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94:315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell J. Leadership development of individuals with developmental disabilities in the self-advocacy movement. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54:1004–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck PT, Orsmond GI, Wagner M, et al. Participation in social activities among adolescents with an autism spectrum disorder. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shpigelman C-N, Gill CJ. The characteristics of unsuccessful e-mentoring relationships for youth with disabilities. Qual Health Res. 2013;23:463–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Test DW, Fowler CH, Brewer DM, et al. A content and methodological review of self advocacy intervention studies. Except Children. 2005;72:101–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer JM, Hwang I, Helfrich CA, et al. Evaluating the social validity of Project TEAM: a problem-solving intervention to teach transition age youth with developmental disabilities to resolve environmental barriers. Int Journal Disability, Development and Education. [in press].
   Google Scholar
• Levin MR, Kramer JM. Key elements supporting goal attainment for transition-age young adults: a case illustration from Project TEAM. Inclusion. 2015;3:145–161.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer J. Identifying and evaluating the therapeutic strategies used during a manualized self-advocacy intervention for transition-age youth. OTJR: Occupation, Participation, and Health. 2015;35:23–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer J, Barth Y, Curtis K, et al. Involving youth with disabilities in the development and evaluation of a new advocacy training: Project TEAM. Disabil Rehab. 2013;35:614–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer JM, Ryan CT, Moore R, et al. Feasibility of electronic peer mentoring for transition?age youth and young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: project teens making environment and activity modifications. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities; 2017:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• DuBois DL, Holloway BE, Valentine JC, et al. Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. Am J Commun Psychol. 2002;30:157–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlund D, Granucci EA, Gamache P, et al. Effects of peer mentors on work-related performance of adolescents with behavioral and/or learning disabilities. J Positive Behav Intervent. 2006;8:244–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer R, Basualdo-Delmonico A, Walsh J, et al. Breaking up is hard to do: A qualitative interview study of how and why youth mentoring relationships end. Youth & Society. 2017;49:438–460.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley P. Qualitative data analysis: practical strategies. Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Booth T, Booth W. Sounds of silence: narrative research with inarticulate subjects. Disabil Soc. 1996;11:55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley M, Antaki C. A conversation analysis of the “acquiescence” of people with learning disabilities. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol. 1996;6:207–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster SJ. Putting words into their mouths? Interviewing people with learning disabilities and little/no speech. Br J Learn Disabil. 2004;32:166–169.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell JA. Validity: Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2013. Chapter 6, Validity: How might you be wrong?; p. 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan G, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 2003;15:85–109.
   Google Scholar
• Parkan B. Professionalism: A virtue or estrangement from self-activity? J Bus Ethics. 2008;78:77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agans JP, Champine RB, Johnson SK, et al. Promoting healthy lifestyles through youth activity participation: Lessons from research. In Bowers EP, Geldhof GJ, Johnson SK, et al. editors. Promoting positive youth development: Lessons from the 4-H study. New York (NY): Springer; 2015. p. 137–158.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan CT, Kramer JM, Cohn ES. Exploring the self-disclosure process in peer mentoring relationships for transition-age youth with developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2016;54:245–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth J, Migliore A. Trends in employment outcomes of young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities 2006–2013. Boston, MA: University of Massachusettes Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth J, Hall AC, Smith F, et al. StateData: The national report on employment services and outcomes. Boston, MA: University of Massachusettes Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion; 2011.
   Google Scholar